• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗事故责任索赔对产科实践模式的影响。

The impact of malpractice liability claims on obstetrical practice patterns.

机构信息

Mathematica Policy Research, 600 Maryland Avenue, S.W., Suite 550, Washington, DC 20024, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2010 Feb;45(1):195-211. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01062.x. Epub 2009 Nov 19.

DOI:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01062.x
PMID:19929964
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2813444/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This paper examines whether malpractice claims have any impact on obstetrical practice patterns (C-section rates) and physician delivery volume.

DATA SOURCES

Secondary data from the 1992-2000 Florida Hospital Inpatient Discharge File, the Florida Medical Professional Liability Insurance Claims File, and the American Medical Association's Master File on physician characteristics.

STUDY DESIGN

The effects of malpractice claims on C-section rates and physician delivery volume were estimated using panel data and a fixed-effects multivariate model.

DATA COLLECTION

Variables were constructed from each data source and merged into a single panel dataset using consistent physician identifiers. Principal Findings. I did not find evidence that physicians changed their practice patterns by increasing C-section rates in response to malpractice claims. However, physicians performed six fewer inpatient deliveries 3 years after the closing of a malpractice claim, after controlling for individual- and market-level characteristics. Physicians with high malpractice awards of U.S.$250,000 or more performed 14 fewer deliveries on average.

CONCLUSIONS

Malpractice claims led to a small reduction in physician delivery volume, but they did not have a significant impact on C-section rates.

摘要

目的

本文旨在探讨医疗事故索赔是否会对产科实践模式(剖宫产率)和医生分娩量产生影响。

资料来源

1992 年至 2000 年佛罗里达州住院患者出院档案、佛罗里达州医疗专业责任保险索赔档案和美国医师协会医师特征主文件中的二次数据。

研究设计

使用面板数据和固定效应多元模型来估计医疗事故索赔对剖宫产率和医生分娩量的影响。

资料收集

从每个数据源构建变量,并使用一致的医师标识符将其合并到一个单一的面板数据集。主要发现。我没有发现证据表明医生会通过增加剖宫产率来应对医疗事故索赔而改变他们的实践模式。然而,在控制了个体和市场特征后,医生在医疗事故索赔结案后 3 年内的住院分娩量减少了 6 次。赔偿金超过 25 万美元的医生的平均分娩量减少了 14 次。

结论

医疗事故索赔导致医生分娩量略有减少,但对剖宫产率没有显著影响。

相似文献

1
The impact of malpractice liability claims on obstetrical practice patterns.医疗事故责任索赔对产科实践模式的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2010 Feb;45(1):195-211. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01062.x. Epub 2009 Nov 19.
2
Medical Malpractice Liability Exposure and OB/GYN Physician Delivery Decisions.医疗事故责任风险与妇产科医生的分娩决策
Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53(4):2633-2650. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12813. Epub 2017 Dec 10.
3
Overview of professional liability.职业责任概述。
Clin Perinatol. 2007 Jun;34(2):227-32, v. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2007.03.002.
4
Malpractice experience and the incidence of cesarean delivery: a physician-level longitudinal analysis.医疗事故经历与剖宫产发生率:一项医生层面的纵向分析。
Inquiry. 2004 Summer;41(2):170-88. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_41.2.170.
5
A comprehensive obstetric patient safety program reduces liability claims and payments.一个全面的产科患者安全计划可减少责任索赔和赔付。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Oct;211(4):319-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.04.038. Epub 2014 Jun 9.
6
Physician spending and subsequent risk of malpractice claims: observational study.医生支出与医疗事故索赔的后续风险:观察性研究。
BMJ. 2015 Nov 4;351:h5516. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h5516.
7
Defensive medicine and obstetrics.防御性医疗与产科学
JAMA. 1995;274(20):1606-10.
8
Professional liability issues and practice patterns of obstetric providers in Washington State.华盛顿州产科医疗服务提供者的职业责任问题及执业模式
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jun;107(6):1238-46. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000218721.83011.7a.
9
The impact of malpractice burden on Michigan obstetrician-gynecologists' career satisfaction.医疗事故负担对密歇根州妇产科医生职业满意度的影响。
Womens Health Issues. 2008 Jul-Aug;18(4):229-37. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2008.02.007.
10
Effect of fear of litigation on obstetric care: a nationwide analysis on obstetric practice.畏惧诉讼对产科护理的影响:一项针对产科实践的全国性分析。
Am J Perinatol. 2011 Apr;28(4):277-84. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1271213. Epub 2011 Jan 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of factors influencing cesarean section rates between 2008 and 2018 in Taiwan: A population-based cross-sectional study.2008年至2018年台湾地区影响剖宫产率的因素分析:一项基于人群的横断面研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Dec 6;103(49):e40811. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040811.
2
Behavioural factors associated with fear of litigation as a driver for the increased use of caesarean sections: a scoping review.与诉讼恐惧相关的行为因素是剖宫产增加的驱动因素:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 19;13(4):e070454. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070454.
3
What are the health consequences associated with differences in medical malpractice liability laws? An instrumental variable analysis of surgery effects on health outcomes for proximal humeral facture across states with different liability rules.不同医疗事故责任法律相关的健康后果是什么?利用工具变量分析不同责任规则州的近端肱骨骨折手术效果对健康结果的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 3;22(1):590. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07839-0.
4
State medical malpractice laws and utilization of surgical treatment for rotator cuff tear and proximal humerus fracture: an observational cohort study.州级医疗事故法与肩袖撕裂和肱骨近端骨折的外科治疗应用:一项观察性队列研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 28;21(1):516. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06544-8.
5
A 12-year analysis of closed medical malpractice claims of the Taiwan civil court: A retrospective study.台湾民事法庭医疗 malpractice 结案索赔的 12 年分析:一项回顾性研究。 (注:malpractice 常见释义为“玩忽职守;渎职;医疗事故” ,这里结合语境可能是指医疗事故相关索赔,但原词在医学专业语境中有特定含义,可能更准确的说法是“医疗过失索赔” ,不过按照要求未做更改。 )
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Mar;97(13):e0237. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010237.
6
Medical Malpractice Liability Exposure and OB/GYN Physician Delivery Decisions.医疗事故责任风险与妇产科医生的分娩决策
Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53(4):2633-2650. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12813. Epub 2017 Dec 10.
7
Decreasing Malpractice Claims by Reducing Preventable Perinatal Harm.通过减少可预防的围产期伤害来降低医疗事故索赔。
Health Serv Res. 2016 Dec;51 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):2453-2471. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12551. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
8
Physician spending and subsequent risk of malpractice claims: observational study.医生支出与医疗事故索赔的后续风险:观察性研究。
BMJ. 2015 Nov 4;351:h5516. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h5516.

本文引用的文献

1
Changes in physician supply and scope of practice during a malpractice crisis: evidence from Pennsylvania.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 May-Jun;26(3):w425-35. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.3.w425. Epub 2007 Apr 24.
2
Impact of malpractice reforms on the supply of physician services.医疗事故改革对医师服务供给的影响。
JAMA. 2005 Jun 1;293(21):2618-25. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.21.2618.
3
Effects of the malpractice crisis on access to and incidence of high-risk procedures: evidence from Florida.医疗事故危机对高风险手术的可及性和发生率的影响:来自佛罗里达州的证据。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 May-Jun;24(3):802-10. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.3.802.
4
Malpractice experience and the incidence of cesarean delivery: a physician-level longitudinal analysis.医疗事故经历与剖宫产发生率:一项医生层面的纵向分析。
Inquiry. 2004 Summer;41(2):170-88. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_41.2.170.
5
Medical malpractice.医疗事故
N Engl J Med. 2004 Jan 15;350(3):283-92. doi: 10.1056/NEJMhpr035470.
6
Using administrative data to identify indications for elective primary cesarean delivery.利用行政数据确定择期剖宫产的指征。
Health Serv Res. 2002 Oct;37(5):1387-401. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.10762.
7
Surgeons' tone of voice: a clue to malpractice history.外科医生的语气:医疗事故历史的线索。
Surgery. 2002 Jul;132(1):5-9. doi: 10.1067/msy.2002.124733.
8
The impact of malpractice fears on cesarean section rates.对医疗事故的担忧对剖宫产率的影响。
J Health Econ. 1999 Aug;18(4):491-522. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(99)00004-1.
9
Relationship between malpractice claims and cesarean delivery.医疗事故索赔与剖宫产之间的关系。
JAMA. 1993 Jan 20;269(3):366-73.
10
The cesarean decision in New York State, 1986. Economic and noneconomic aspects.
Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):529-40. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00006.