NIVEL (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), PO Box 1568, 3500 BN, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
BMC Public Health. 2009 Nov 20;9:423. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-423.
To date, online public healthcare reports have not been effectively used by consumers. Therefore, we qualitatively examined how healthcare consumers process and evaluate comparative healthcare information on the Internet.
Using semi-structured cognitive interviews, interviewees (n = 20) were asked to think aloud and answer questions, as they were prompted with three Dutch web pages providing comparative healthcare information.
We identified twelve themes from consumers' thoughts and evaluations. These themes were categorized under four important areas of interest: (1) a response to the design; (2) a response to the information content; (3) the use of the information, and (4) the purpose of the information.
Several barriers to an effective use of comparative healthcare information were identified, such as too much information and the ambiguity of terms presented on websites. Particularly important for future research is the question of how comparative healthcare information can be integrated with alternative information, such as patient reviews on the Internet. Furthermore, the readability of quality of care concepts is an issue that needs further attention, both from websites and communication experts.
迄今为止,消费者尚未有效利用在线公共医疗保健报告。因此,我们从质化角度研究了消费者如何在互联网上处理和评估比较性医疗保健信息。
采用半结构式认知访谈,要求 20 名受访者在浏览三个提供比较性医疗保健信息的荷兰网页时,大声说出自己的想法并回答问题。
我们从消费者的想法和评估中确定了十二个主题。这些主题分为四个主要关注领域:(1)对设计的回应;(2)对信息内容的回应;(3)信息的使用;(4)信息的目的。
确定了一些有效利用比较性医疗保健信息的障碍,例如网站上呈现的信息过多且术语不明确。对于未来的研究来说,特别重要的问题是如何将比较性医疗保健信息与替代信息(如互联网上的患者评论)相结合。此外,护理质量概念的可读性是一个需要进一步关注的问题,无论是网站还是沟通专家都需要关注。