AED, 1825 Connecticut Ave NW Washington, DC 20009, USA.
Malar J. 2009 Nov 23;8:264. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-8-264.
Many countries across sub-Saharan Africa are rapidly increasing insecticide-treated net (ITN) coverage to combat malaria, but systematic data on the use of those ITNs and the factors affecting this use are scarce.
A household survey was conducted during malaria season in 23 communities of Amhara and Oromia Regional States, Ethiopia, stratified by degree of urbanization (rural, peri-urban, or urban), whether or not they received indoor residual spraying (IRS), and whether or not free nets had been distributed. Descriptive statistics as well as univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to describe household net ownership and identify factors associated with use or non-use of nets already in the household. A qualitative component consisting of observations of ITNs in households and several open-ended questions provided further understanding of the reasons for ITN use and non-use.
Of 857 surveyed households, 91% owned at least one ITN, but only 65% of ITNs owned had been used the prior night. The multivariate analysis found that the factors significantly associated with an ITN being used were regional state (Amhara) (Odds Ratio [OR] = 0.61; 95% Confidence Interval [C.I.] 0.43 - 0.86]; p < 0.01), residing in a house sprayed with IRS (OR = 1.89; 95% C.I. 1.36 - 2.63; p < 0.001), age of ITN (<12 months) (OR = 0.55; 95% C.I. 0.37 - 0.82; p < 0.01), shape (conical) (OR = 2.27; 95% C.I. 1.10 - 4.68; p < 0.05), and paying for the ITN rather than receiving it free (OR = 2.16; 95% C.I. 1.32 - 3.53; p < 0.01). The most common reasons for ITN non-use identified through the qualitative component of the study were: there are few mosquitoes around or malaria is not a serious problem; the ITN is no longer effective; ITN is in poor condition; the ITN is being saved. Observations showed many ITNs hanging incorrectly, and some being used for purposes other than as a bed net.
The very high ITN ownership in the study areas suggests that a strategy targeting free nets to rural and poor households combined with support for the commercial sector is an effective means of achieving high coverage. The data suggests that use of ITNs owned could be increased by distribution of conical ITNs, continued development of the commercial sector, replacement schemes for worn-out ITNs, assistance with hanging of ITNs, and communication addressing misperceptions about ITNs.
撒哈拉以南非洲的许多国家正在迅速提高驱虫蚊帐(ITN)的覆盖率,以防治疟疾,但关于这些 ITN 的使用情况以及影响使用的因素的系统数据却很少。
在埃塞俄比亚的阿姆哈拉和奥罗米亚地区的 23 个社区,在疟疾季节进行了一项家庭调查,按城市化程度(农村、城乡结合部或城市)、是否接受室内滞留喷洒(IRS)以及是否分发免费蚊帐进行分层。使用描述性统计以及单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析来描述家庭蚊帐拥有情况,并确定与家庭中已使用或未使用的蚊帐相关的因素。一个由观察家庭中的 ITN 和几个开放式问题组成的定性部分提供了对 ITN 使用和未使用的原因的进一步了解。
在所调查的 857 户家庭中,91%拥有至少一个 ITN,但只有 65%的 ITN 在前一晚使用过。多变量分析发现,与 ITN 使用显著相关的因素是地区(阿姆哈拉)(优势比[OR] = 0.61;95%置信区间[C.I.] 0.43 - 0.86;p < 0.01)、居住在喷洒 IRS 的房屋中(OR = 1.89;95% C.I. 1.36 - 2.63;p < 0.001)、ITN 的年龄(<12 个月)(OR = 0.55;95% C.I. 0.37 - 0.82;p < 0.01)、形状(圆锥形)(OR = 2.27;95% C.I. 1.10 - 4.68;p < 0.05)和支付 ITN 费用而不是免费获得 ITN(OR = 2.16;95% C.I. 1.32 - 3.53;p < 0.01)。通过研究的定性部分确定的 ITN 未使用的最常见原因是:周围蚊子很少或疟疾不是严重问题;ITN 不再有效;ITN 状况不佳;ITN 正在保存中。观察结果显示,许多 ITN 挂得不正确,有些被用于除了作为蚊帐之外的其他用途。
研究地区非常高的 ITN 拥有率表明,针对农村和贫困家庭免费提供蚊帐并支持商业部门的战略是实现高覆盖率的有效手段。数据表明,通过分发圆锥形 ITN、继续发展商业部门、为破旧的 ITN 更换计划、协助悬挂 ITN 以及解决对 ITN 的误解来沟通,可以增加对已拥有的 ITN 的使用。