King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Estia Center, 66 Snowsfields, London SE1 3SS, UK.
Res Dev Disabil. 2010 Mar-Apr;31(2):458-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2009.10.015. Epub 2009 Nov 22.
The aim of this study was to investigate co-morbid psychopathology and clinical characteristics of adults with ID living across different types of residential settings. All participants were first time referrals to specialist services in South-East London who lived either with their family (N=375) or in supported residence (N=280) or independently (N=95). Psychiatric diagnoses were based on ICD 10 criteria following clinical interviews with key informants and patients. Logistic regression analyses showed that personality disorders were more likely to be diagnosed in people who lived independently or in supported residence, while anxiety disorders were more likely in those living with their family. Overall, those who lived in independent residence had higher rates of co-morbid psychopathology. These effects were independent of ID level and age differences. Younger adults were more likely to live with their families while those with higher ID level were about 17 times more likely to live independently. The largest proportion of referrals to outpatients lived in independent residence although there were no significant differences in other care pathways. The findings are discussed in terms of implications for service planning and development.
本研究旨在调查居住在不同类型居住环境中的成年 ID 患者的共病精神病理学和临床特征。所有参与者均首次被转介到伦敦东南部的专科服务机构,他们要么与家人一起居住(N=375),要么居住在支持性住所(N=280),要么独立居住(N=95)。精神科诊断基于临床访谈和主要知情人与患者的 ICD 10 标准。逻辑回归分析显示,独立居住或居住在支持性住所的人更有可能被诊断为人格障碍,而焦虑障碍更可能发生在与家人一起生活的人身上。总的来说,独立居住的人共病精神病理学的发生率更高。这些影响独立于 ID 水平和年龄差异。年轻的成年人更有可能与家人一起生活,而 ID 水平较高的成年人独立生活的可能性大约高出 17 倍。尽管在其他护理途径上没有显著差异,但大多数转介到门诊的患者都居住在独立住所。这些发现从服务规划和发展的角度进行了讨论。