Williams Nombasa
School of Psychology, Social Work and Social Policy, University of South Australia, Australian Centre for Child Protection Underdale, South Australia, Australia.
J Child Health Care. 2010 Mar;14(1):35-51. doi: 10.1177/1367493509347116. Epub 2009 Nov 20.
Currently an ecological model for conceptualizing and capturing the refugee parenting experience is lacking. After an extensive review of the literature related to the usages of Bronfenbrenner's ecological model of child development, a gap was found in knowledge and research centred on describing the environment of pre-resettlement (i.e. pre-flight, flight, migration, camp) contexts and their impact on refugee parents and carer experiences. The culture of the refugee parenting experience may be characterized by disruptions in and alterations to family structure and organization; values and norms; and gender roles. This paper begins by examining the definition and usages of existing ecological frameworks in the 20th and 21st century. Particular attention is drawn to the gaps in the existing literature and an ecological model is offered. The paper concludes with a discussion of the implications for practice. The outcomes of this paper suggest the need for practitioners, policymakers and researchers to engage and develop culturally competent, relevant and appropriate interventions (i.e. reconciling differing beliefs and behaviours concerning child-rearing practices; affirming positive parenting practices of these families during engagement protocols and processes; adopting a strengths-based orientation) in the area of child protection whilst at the same time safeguarding and promoting the welfare of children within pre- and post-resettlement contexts.
目前,尚缺乏一个用于概念化和描述难民育儿经历的生态模型。在广泛查阅了与布朗芬布伦纳儿童发展生态模型应用相关的文献后,发现以描述安置前(即飞行前、飞行、迁移、营地)环境及其对难民父母和照料者经历的影响为核心的知识和研究存在空白。难民育儿经历的文化特征可能表现为家庭结构和组织、价值观和规范以及性别角色的中断和改变。本文首先审视20世纪和21世纪现有生态框架的定义和应用。特别关注现有文献中的空白,并提出一个生态模型。本文最后讨论了对实践的启示。本文的研究结果表明,从业者、政策制定者和研究人员需要在儿童保护领域开展并制定具有文化能力、相关且适当的干预措施(即协调有关育儿实践的不同信念和行为;在接触协议和过程中肯定这些家庭积极的育儿实践;采取基于优势的取向),同时在安置前后的背景下保障和促进儿童的福利。