• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据入组设置的不同,临床试验患者特征和结局存在差异。

Differences in clinical trial patient attributes and outcomes according to enrollment setting.

机构信息

Dept of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, 180A Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jan 10;28(2):215-21. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.3652. Epub 2009 Nov 23.

DOI:10.1200/JCO.2008.21.3652
PMID:19933919
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2815711/
Abstract

PURPOSE

During the last 25 years, National Cancer Institute (NCI) cooperative trial groups have extended trial networks from academic centers to include certain community and Veterans Health Administration (VHA) centers. We compared trial patients' attributes and outcomes by these enrollment settings.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Studying 2,708 patients on one of 10 cooperative group, randomized lung trials at 272 institutions, we compared patient attributes by enrollment setting (ie, academic, community, and VHA affiliates). We used adjusted Cox regression to evaluate for survival differences by setting.

RESULTS

Main member institutions enrolled 44% of patients; community affiliates enrolled 44%; and VHAs enrolled 12%. Patient attributes (ie, case-mix) of age, ethnicity, sex, and performance status varied by enrollment setting. After analysis was adjusted for patient case-mix, no mortality differences by enrollment setting were noted.

CONCLUSION

Although trial patients with primarily advanced-stage lung cancer from nonacademic centers were older and had worse performance statuses than those from academic centers, survival did not differ by enrollment setting after analysis accounted for patient heterogeneity. An answer for whether long-term outcomes for patients at community and VHA centers affiliated with cooperative trial groups are equivalent to those at academic centers when care is delivered through NCI trials requires additional research among patients with longer survival horizons.

摘要

目的

在过去的 25 年中,美国国家癌症研究所(NCI)合作试验组已经将试验网络从学术中心扩展到包括某些社区和退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)中心。我们比较了这些入组设置下的试验患者的特征和结果。

方法

在 272 个机构的 10 个合作组随机肺试验中,对 2708 名患者进行了研究,我们比较了入组设置(即学术、社区和 VHA 附属机构)患者的特征。我们使用调整后的 Cox 回归来评估设置对生存的影响。

结果

主要成员机构入组了 44%的患者;社区附属机构入组了 44%;VHA 入组了 12%。患者的年龄、种族、性别和表现状态等特征因入组设置而异。在对患者病例组合进行分析调整后,未发现入组设置与死亡率之间存在差异。

结论

尽管来自非学术中心的主要为晚期肺癌的试验患者比来自学术中心的患者年龄更大,表现状态更差,但在考虑到患者异质性后,分析结果显示,入组设置与生存之间没有差异。关于社区和 VHA 中心与合作试验组附属机构的患者的长期结局是否与学术中心相当,当通过 NCI 试验提供治疗时,这需要在具有更长生存前景的患者中进行进一步的研究。

相似文献

1
Differences in clinical trial patient attributes and outcomes according to enrollment setting.根据入组设置的不同,临床试验患者特征和结局存在差异。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jan 10;28(2):215-21. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.3652. Epub 2009 Nov 23.
2
Organizational designs for achieving high treatment trial enrollment: a fuzzy-set analysis of the community clinical oncology program.实现高治疗试验入组的组织设计:社区临床肿瘤计划的模糊集分析。
J Oncol Pract. 2012 Sep;8(5):287-91. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000507. Epub 2012 May 1.
3
Enrollment of adolescents and young adults onto SWOG cancer research network clinical trials: A comparative analysis by treatment site and era.SWOG 癌症研究网络临床试验中青少年和年轻成年人的入组:按治疗部位和时代的对比分析。
Cancer Med. 2020 Mar;9(6):2146-2152. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2891. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Generalizing the results of cancer clinical trials.
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jan 10;28(2):187-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.8608. Epub 2009 Nov 23.
6
The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.美国国家癌症研究所全爱尔兰癌症会议。
Oncologist. 1999;4(4):275-277.
7
Better outcomes for patients treated at hospitals that participate in clinical trials.在参与临床试验的医院接受治疗的患者有更好的治疗结果。
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Mar 24;168(6):657-62. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2007.124.
8
Clinical Trial Accrual Targeting Genomic Alterations After Next-Generation Sequencing at a Non-National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Program.在一个非国立癌症研究所指定的癌症项目中,基于二代测序结果进行基因组改变的临床试验入组目标。
J Oncol Pract. 2016 Apr;12(4):e396-404. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.008433. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
9
Quality of pancreatic cancer care at Veterans Administration compared with non-Veterans Administration hospitals.退伍军人事务部医院与非退伍军人事务部医院的胰腺癌护理质量比较。
Am J Surg. 2007 Nov;194(5):588-93. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.07.012.
10
A comparison of clinical trial enrollment between adolescent and young adult (AYA) oncology patients treated at affiliated adult and pediatric oncology centers.附属成人与儿科肿瘤中心治疗的青少年和青年成人(AYA)肿瘤患者临床试验入组情况的比较。
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2009 Dec;31(12):927-9. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0b013e3181b91180.

引用本文的文献

1
Heterogeneity in pragmatic randomised trials: sources and management.实用随机临床试验中的异质性:来源与管理。
BMC Med. 2022 Oct 28;20(1):372. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02569-w.
2
Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for C. difficile Infections Across Academic and Private Clinical Settings.粪菌移植治疗艰难梭菌感染在学术和私立临床机构中的长期疗效及安全性
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2023;57(10):1024-1030. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001778. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
3
Comparison of outcomes in a population-based cohort of metastatic breast cancer patients receiving anti-HER2 therapy with clinical trial outcomes.比较接受抗 HER2 治疗的转移性乳腺癌患者的基于人群队列的临床结局与临床试验结局。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 May;181(1):155-165. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05614-5. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
4
Parental psychological distress and cancer stage: a comparison of adults with metastatic and non-metastatic cancer.父母心理困扰与癌症分期:转移性与非转移性癌症成人比较。
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Jul;27(7):2443-2451. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4518-1. Epub 2018 Oct 27.
5
Association of Broad-Based Genomic Sequencing With Survival Among Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Community Oncology Setting.社区肿瘤学环境中广泛基于基因组测序与晚期非小细胞肺癌患者生存的关联。
JAMA. 2018 Aug 7;320(5):469-477. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.9824.
6
Institutional Enrollment and Survival Among NSCLC Patients Receiving Chemoradiation: NRG Oncology Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0617.接受放化疗的非小细胞肺癌患者的机构登记与生存情况:NRG肿瘤学放射治疗肿瘤学组(RTOG)0617研究
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 May 19;108(9). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw034. Print 2016 Sep.
7
Demographic and other characteristics of nodal non-Hodgkin's lymphoma managed in academic versus non-academic centers.学术中心与非学术中心治疗的淋巴结非霍奇金淋巴瘤的人口统计学及其他特征。
Ther Adv Hematol. 2015 Oct;6(5):223-7. doi: 10.1177/2040620715592568.
8
Analysis of site performance in academic-based and community-based centers in the IDEAL Study.在 IDEAL 研究中分析学术型和社区型中心的站点性能。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013 Nov-Dec;47(10):e91-5. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e318294baa4.
9
Survival of older patients with cancer in the Veterans Health Administration versus fee-for-service Medicare.退伍军人事务部医疗体系中癌症老年患者的生存率与按服务收费的医疗保险相比。
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Apr 1;30(10):1072-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.6758. Epub 2012 Mar 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Components of variation in serum carotenoid concentrations: the Polyp Prevention Trial.血清类胡萝卜素浓度变化的组成部分:息肉预防试验
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009 Jun;63(6):763-70. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2008.26. Epub 2008 Apr 16.
2
Change in health status and mortality as indicators of outcomes: comparison between the Medicare Advantage Program and the Veterans Health Administration.作为结果指标的健康状况变化和死亡率:医疗保险优势计划与退伍军人健康管理局的比较
Qual Life Res. 2007 Sep;16(7):1179-91. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9216-2. Epub 2007 May 25.
3
Clinical trials in the elderly--a concept comes of age.针对老年人的临床试验——一个成熟的概念。
N Engl J Med. 2007 Apr 12;356(15):1575-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe078023.
4
Induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy compared with chemoradiotherapy alone for regionally advanced unresectable stage III Non-small-cell lung cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B.诱导化疗后序贯放化疗与单纯放化疗治疗局部晚期不可切除的 III 期非小细胞肺癌的比较:癌症与白血病B组研究
J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 1;25(13):1698-704. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.3569. Epub 2007 Apr 2.
5
Eligibility criteria of randomized controlled trials published in high-impact general medical journals: a systematic sampling review.发表于高影响力综合医学期刊的随机对照试验的纳入标准:一项系统抽样综述
JAMA. 2007 Mar 21;297(11):1233-40. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.11.1233.
6
Generalizability of cancer clinical trial results: prognostic differences between participants and nonparticipants.癌症临床试验结果的可推广性:参与者与非参与者之间的预后差异。
Cancer. 2006 Jun 1;106(11):2452-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21907.
7
The causes and effects of socio-demographic exclusions from clinical trials.临床试验中社会人口学排除的原因及影响。
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Oct;9(38):iii-iv, ix-x, 1-152. doi: 10.3310/hta9380.
8
Enrolling older persons in cancer trials: the effect of sociodemographic, protocol, and recruitment center characteristics.招募老年人参与癌症试验:社会人口统计学、试验方案及招募中心特征的影响
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jul 20;23(21):4755-63. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.14.365.
9
Randomized phase III intergroup trial of etoposide and cisplatin with or without paclitaxel and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9732.广泛期小细胞肺癌患者中依托泊苷和顺铂联合或不联合紫杉醇及粒细胞集落刺激因子的随机III期组间试验:癌症与白血病B组试验9732
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jun 1;23(16):3752-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.09.071.
10
A phase III trial evaluating the combination of cisplatin, etoposide, and radiation therapy with or without tamoxifen in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer: Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study (9235).一项III期试验,评估顺铂、依托泊苷和放射治疗联合或不联合他莫昔芬用于局限期小细胞肺癌患者的疗效:癌症与白血病B组研究(9235)
Am J Clin Oncol. 2005 Feb;28(1):81-90. doi: 10.1097/01.coc.0000139940.52625.d0.