• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为结果指标的健康状况变化和死亡率:医疗保险优势计划与退伍军人健康管理局的比较

Change in health status and mortality as indicators of outcomes: comparison between the Medicare Advantage Program and the Veterans Health Administration.

作者信息

Selim Alfredo J, Kazis Lewis E, Rogers William, Qian Shirley X, Rothendler James A, Spiro Avron, Ren Xinhua S, Miller Donald, Selim Bernardo J, Fincke Benjamin G

机构信息

Center for Health Quality, Outcomes, and Economic Research, A Health Services Research and Development Field Program, VA Medical Center, Bedford, MA, USA.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2007 Sep;16(7):1179-91. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9216-2. Epub 2007 May 25.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-007-9216-2
PMID:17530447
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Comparing health outcomes with adequate methodology is central to performance assessments of health care systems. We compared the Medicare Advantage Program (MAP) and the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) with regard to changes in health status and mortality.

METHODS

We used the Death-Master-File for vital status and the Short-Form 36 to determine physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) health at baseline and at 2 years. We compared the probability of being alive with the same or better (than would be expected by chance) PCS (or MCS) at 2 years and mortality, while adjusting for case-mix. Given the geographic variations in MAP enrollment, we did a regional sub-analysis.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the probability of being alive with the same or better PCS except for the South (VHA 65.8% vs. MAP 62.5%, P = .0014). VHA patients had a slightly higher probability than MAP patients of being alive with the same or better MCS (71.8% vs. 70.1%, P = .002) but no significant regional variations. The hazard ratios for mortality in the MAP were higher than in the VHA across all regions.

CONCLUSION

With the use of appropriate methodology, we found small differences in 2-year health outcomes that favor the VHA.

摘要

背景

运用适当的方法比较健康结局是医疗保健系统绩效评估的核心。我们比较了医疗保险优势计划(MAP)和退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)在健康状况变化和死亡率方面的情况。

方法

我们使用死亡主文件来确定生命状态,并使用简明健康调查问卷36项简表来确定基线时和2年后的身体(PCS)和精神(MCS)健康状况。我们比较了在2年时存活且PCS(或MCS)与基线相同或更好(高于随机预期)的概率以及死亡率,同时对病例组合进行了调整。鉴于MAP参保情况存在地理差异,我们进行了区域亚组分析。

结果

除南部地区外,存活且PCS与基线相同或更好的概率没有显著差异(VHA为65.8%,MAP为62.5%,P = 0.0014)。VHA患者存活且MCS与基线相同或更好的概率略高于MAP患者(71.8%对70.1%,P = 0.002),但无显著区域差异。在所有地区,MAP的死亡率风险比均高于VHA。

结论

通过使用适当的方法,我们发现2年健康结局存在细微差异,这些差异有利于VHA。

相似文献

1
Change in health status and mortality as indicators of outcomes: comparison between the Medicare Advantage Program and the Veterans Health Administration.作为结果指标的健康状况变化和死亡率:医疗保险优势计划与退伍军人健康管理局的比较
Qual Life Res. 2007 Sep;16(7):1179-91. doi: 10.1007/s11136-007-9216-2. Epub 2007 May 25.
2
Risk-adjusted mortality as an indicator of outcomes: comparison of the Medicare Advantage Program with the Veterans' Health Administration.风险调整死亡率作为结果指标:医疗保险优势计划与退伍军人健康管理局的比较。
Med Care. 2006 Apr;44(4):359-65. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000204119.27597.f1.
3
Use of risk-adjusted change in health status to assess the performance of integrated service networks in the Veterans Health Administration.利用健康状况的风险调整变化来评估退伍军人健康管理局综合服务网络的绩效。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2006 Feb;18(1):43-50. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzi080. Epub 2005 Oct 7.
4
Comparison of health outcomes for male seniors in the Veterans Health Administration and Medicare Advantage plans.退伍军人健康管理局和医疗保险优势计划中老年男性的健康结果比较。
Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr;45(2):376-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01068.x. Epub 2009 Dec 30.
5
Differences in risk-adjusted mortality between medicaid-eligible patients enrolled in medicare advantage plans and those enrolled in the veterans health administration.参加医疗保险优势计划的符合医疗补助条件的患者与参加退伍军人健康管理局计划的患者在风险调整死亡率方面的差异。
J Ambul Care Manage. 2009 Jul-Sep;32(3):232-40. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e3181ac9d49.
6
Multiple system utilization and mortality for veterans with stroke.中风退伍军人的多系统利用率和死亡率
Stroke. 2007 Feb;38(2):355-60. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000254457.38901.fb. Epub 2006 Dec 28.
7
Monitoring outcomes for the Medicare Advantage program: methods and application of the VR-12 for evaluation of plans.医疗保险优势计划的结果监测:用于计划评估的VR-12方法及应用
J Ambul Care Manage. 2012 Oct-Dec;35(4):263-276. doi: 10.1097/JAC.0b013e318267468f.
8
Care following acute myocardial infarction in the Veterans Administration Medical Centers: a comparison with Medicare.退伍军人管理局医疗中心急性心肌梗死后的护理:与医疗保险的比较。
Health Serv Res. 2004 Dec;39(6 Pt 1):1773-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00317.x.
9
Measurement comparisons of the medical outcomes study and veterans SF-36 health survey.医学结局研究与退伍军人简明健康调查问卷的测量比较。
Health Care Financ Rev. 2004 Summer;25(4):43-58.
10
Short-term mortality following cataract surgery: comparison of Veterans Health Administration and Medicare outcomes.白内障手术后的短期死亡率:退伍军人健康管理局与医疗保险结果的比较。
Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2012 Jun;19(3):144-8. doi: 10.3109/09286586.2012.680530.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of the affordable care Act (ACA) on favorable risk selection and Beneficiaries' health status in Medicare advantage: a preliminary assessment.《平价医疗法案》(ACA)对医疗保险优势计划中有利风险选择和受益人群健康状况的影响:初步评估
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 18;16(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1663-4.
2
Comparing VA and Non-VA Quality of Care: A Systematic Review.比较退伍军人事务部(VA)与非退伍军人事务部的医疗质量:一项系统综述。
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Jan;32(1):105-121. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3775-2. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
3
Determining population based mortality risk in the Department of Veterans Affairs.

本文引用的文献

1
Dual use of Medicare and the Veterans Health Administration: are there adverse health outcomes?医疗保险和退伍军人健康管理局的双重使用:是否存在不良健康后果?
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Oct 9;6:131. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-131.
2
Transforming the SF-36 to account for death in longitudinal studies with three-year follow-up.
Med Care. 2006 Oct;44(10):956-9. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000228022.79359.95.
3
Use of health-related, quality-of-life metrics to predict mortality and hospitalizations in community-dwelling seniors.使用与健康相关的生活质量指标预测社区居住老年人的死亡率和住院率。
确定退伍军人事务部的人群死亡率风险。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2012 Jun;15(2):121-37. doi: 10.1007/s10729-011-9189-0. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
4
Comparison of health outcomes for male seniors in the Veterans Health Administration and Medicare Advantage plans.退伍军人健康管理局和医疗保险优势计划中老年男性的健康结果比较。
Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr;45(2):376-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01068.x. Epub 2009 Dec 30.
5
Differences in clinical trial patient attributes and outcomes according to enrollment setting.根据入组设置的不同,临床试验患者特征和结局存在差异。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jan 10;28(2):215-21. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.3652. Epub 2009 Nov 23.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Apr;54(4):667-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00681.x.
4
Risk-adjusted mortality as an indicator of outcomes: comparison of the Medicare Advantage Program with the Veterans' Health Administration.风险调整死亡率作为结果指标:医疗保险优势计划与退伍军人健康管理局的比较。
Med Care. 2006 Apr;44(4):359-65. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000204119.27597.f1.
5
Two-year changes in health and functional status among elderly Medicare beneficiaries in HMOs and fee-for-service.健康维护组织(HMO)和按服务收费模式下老年医疗保险受益人的健康及功能状态的两年变化情况。
Health Serv Res. 2000 Dec;35(5 Pt 3):44-59.
6
Medicare program; establishment of the Medicare Advantage Program; interpretation. Final rule; interpretation.医疗保险计划;医疗保险优势计划的设立;解释。最终规则;解释。
Fed Regist. 2005 Mar 21;70(53):13401-2.
7
Comparison of quality of care for patients in the Veterans Health Administration and patients in a national sample.退伍军人健康管理局患者与全国样本患者的医疗质量比较。
Ann Intern Med. 2004 Dec 21;141(12):938-45. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-141-12-200412210-00010.
8
The Veterans Health Administration: quality, value, accountability, and information as transforming strategies for patient-centered care.退伍军人健康管理局:质量、价值、问责制和信息作为以患者为中心的护理的转型策略。
Am J Manag Care. 2004 Nov;10(11 Pt 2):828-36.
9
Agreement between self-report questionnaires and medical record data was substantial for diabetes, hypertension, myocardial infarction and stroke but not for heart failure.自我报告问卷与病历数据之间在糖尿病、高血压、心肌梗死和中风方面的一致性很高,但在心力衰竭方面则不然。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Oct;57(10):1096-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.04.005.
10
Measurement comparisons of the medical outcomes study and veterans SF-36 health survey.医学结局研究与退伍军人简明健康调查问卷的测量比较。
Health Care Financ Rev. 2004 Summer;25(4):43-58.