Department of Biomedical Engineering/Biophysics, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Hypertension. 2010 Jan;55(1):124-30. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.143867. Epub 2009 Nov 23.
Arterial stiffening plays an important role in the development of hypertension and cardiovascular diseases. The intrinsically nonlinear (ie, pressure-dependent) elastic behavior of arteries may have serious consequences for the accuracy and interpretation of arterial stiffness measurements and, ultimately, for individual patient management. We determined aortic pressure and common carotid artery diameter waveforms in 21 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. The individual pressure-area curves were described using a dual exponential analytic model facilitating noise-free calculation of incremental pulse wave velocity. In addition, compliance coefficients were calculated separately in the diastolic and systolic pressure ranges, only using diastolic, dicrotic notch, and systolic data points, which can be determined noninvasively. Pulse wave velocity at systolic pressure exhibited a much stronger positive correlation with pulse pressure (P<0.001) and age (P=0.012) than pulse wave velocity at diastolic pressure. Patients with an elevated systolic blood pressure (>140 mm Hg) had a 2.5-times lower compliance coefficient in the systolic pressure range than patients with systolic blood pressures <140 mm Hg (P=0.002). Most importantly, some individuals, with comparable age or pulse pressure, had similar diastolic but discriminately different systolic pulse wave velocities and compliance coefficients. We conclude that noninvasive assessment of arterial stiffness could and should discriminate between systolic and diastolic pressure ranges to more precisely characterize arterial function in individual patients.
动脉僵硬度在高血压和心血管疾病的发展中起着重要作用。动脉的固有非线性(即压力依赖性)弹性行为可能对动脉僵硬度测量的准确性和解释产生严重影响,并最终影响个体患者的管理。我们在 21 例行心导管检查的患者中确定了主动脉压和颈总动脉直径波形。使用双指数分析模型描述个体压力-面积曲线,该模型有助于无噪声地计算增量脉搏波速度。此外,仅使用舒张压、双切迹和收缩压数据点,可以分别计算舒张期和收缩压范围内的顺应性系数,这些数据点可以无创确定。收缩压时的脉搏波速度与脉压(P<0.001)和年龄(P=0.012)呈更强的正相关,而舒张压时的脉搏波速度则没有这种相关性。收缩压升高(>140mmHg)的患者在收缩压范围内的顺应性系数比收缩压<140mmHg 的患者低 2.5 倍(P=0.002)。最重要的是,一些年龄或脉压相似的个体,具有相似的舒张压,但脉搏波速度和顺应性系数在收缩压方面存在明显差异。我们的结论是,动脉僵硬度的无创评估可以而且应该区分收缩压和舒张压范围,以更精确地描述个体患者的动脉功能。