• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Physician and pharmacist collaboration to improve blood pressure control.医生与药剂师合作以改善血压控制。
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Nov 23;169(21):1996-2002. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.358.
2
Pharmacist-physician comanagement of hypertension and reduction in 24-hour ambulatory blood pressures.药剂师与医生共同管理高血压及降低24小时动态血压
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Oct 11;170(18):1634-9. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.349.
3
Cluster-randomized trial of a physician/pharmacist collaborative model to improve blood pressure control.一项关于医生/药剂师合作模式以改善血压控制的整群随机试验。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 May;8(3):235-43. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001283. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
4
Effect of home blood pressure telemonitoring and pharmacist management on blood pressure control: a cluster randomized clinical trial.家庭血压远程监测和药师管理对血压控制的影响:一项集群随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2013 Jul 3;310(1):46-56. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.6549.
5
Cost-Effectiveness of a Physician-Pharmacist Collaboration Intervention to Improve Blood Pressure Control.医生-药剂师合作干预改善血压控制的成本效益
Hypertension. 2015 Dec;66(6):1145-51. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.115.06023. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
6
Long-term Outcomes of the Effects of Home Blood Pressure Telemonitoring and Pharmacist Management on Blood Pressure Among Adults With Uncontrolled Hypertension: Follow-up of a Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.家庭血压远程监测和药师管理对血压控制不佳的成年人血压影响的长期结果:一项集群随机临床试验的随访。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Sep 7;1(5):e181617. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1617.
7
A cluster randomized trial to evaluate physician/pharmacist collaboration to improve blood pressure control.一项评估医生/药剂师合作以改善血压控制的整群随机试验。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2008 Apr;10(4):260-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2008.07434.x.
8
Randomized Trial of the Effect of Pharmacist Prescribing on Improving Blood Pressure in the Community: The Alberta Clinical Trial in Optimizing Hypertension (RxACTION).随机临床试验:药师处方对改善社区血压的影响——艾伯塔省高血压优化临床试验(RxACTION)。
Circulation. 2015 Jul 14;132(2):93-100. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.015464. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
9
Primary care-based, pharmacist-physician collaborative medication-therapy management of hypertension: a randomized, pragmatic trial.基于初级保健的药剂师-医生协作高血压药物治疗管理:一项随机实用试验。
Clin Ther. 2014 Sep 1;36(9):1244-54. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.06.030. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
10
The impact of a multidisciplinary information technology-supported program on blood pressure control in primary care.多学科信息技术支持项目对初级保健中血压控制的影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009 May;2(3):170-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.108.823765. Epub 2009 May 5.

引用本文的文献

1
The effectiveness of the chronic disease management for hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis.高血压慢性病管理的有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jul 25;104(30):e42455. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042455.
2
Pharmacists delivering hypertension care services: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.提供高血压护理服务的药剂师:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Mar 14;12:1477729. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1477729. eCollection 2025.
3
Impact of patient care teams on blood pressure control in patients with hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.患者护理团队对高血压患者血压控制的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hypertens Res. 2025 Feb 17. doi: 10.1038/s41440-025-02152-9.
4
The Long-Term Blood Pressure Trends Following a Remote Hypertension Intervention: A Secondary Analysis of the Digital Care Transformation - Remotely Delivered Hypertension Management Program.远程高血压干预后的长期血压趋势:数字护理转型——远程提供的高血压管理项目的二次分析
Hypertension. 2025 Apr;82(4):733-742. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.24475. Epub 2025 Jan 31.
5
Closing the Gap: Digital Innovations to Address Hypertension Disparities.缩小差距:应对高血压差异的数字创新
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2025 Jan 15;27(1):23. doi: 10.1007/s11886-024-02171-x.
6
Role of Health Care Professionals in the Success of Blood Pressure Control Interventions in Patients With Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis.卫生保健专业人员在高血压患者血压控制干预措施成功中的作用:一项荟萃分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2024 Aug;17(8):e010396. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.123.010396. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
7
Involving community pharmacists in interprofessional collaboration in primary care: a systematic review.社区药剂师参与初级保健中的跨专业合作:系统评价。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Apr 1;25(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02326-3.
8
Reimagining Medication Adherence: A Novel Holistic Model for Hypertension Therapy.重新构想药物依从性:高血压治疗的一种新型整体模型。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 Feb 12;18:391-410. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S442645. eCollection 2024.
9
Remote follow-up by pharmacists for blood pressure control in patients with hypertension: a systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.药师对高血压患者血压控制的远程随访:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 30;14(1):2535. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52894-8.
10
Interprofessional collaboration in primary care: what effect on patient health? A systematic literature review.初级保健中的跨专业合作:对患者健康有何影响?系统文献回顾。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Nov 29;24(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02189-0.

本文引用的文献

1
The potency of team-based care interventions for hypertension: a meta-analysis.基于团队的高血压护理干预措施的效力:一项荟萃分析。
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Oct 26;169(19):1748-55. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.316.
2
Reduction in adverse symptoms as blood pressure becomes controlled.随着血压得到控制,不良症状减少。
Pharmacotherapy. 2008 Sep;28(9):1104-14. doi: 10.1592/phco.28.9.1104.
3
Physician adherence to blood pressure guidelines and its effect on seniors.医生对血压指南的遵循情况及其对老年人的影响。
Pharmacotherapy. 2008 Jul;28(7):843-51. doi: 10.1592/phco.28.7.843.
4
A cluster randomized trial to evaluate physician/pharmacist collaboration to improve blood pressure control.一项评估医生/药剂师合作以改善血压控制的整群随机试验。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2008 Apr;10(4):260-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2008.07434.x.
5
Explicit and implicit evaluation of physician adherence to hypertension guidelines.对医生遵循高血压指南情况的明确和隐性评估。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2007 Feb;9(2):113-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2007.06112.x.
6
Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension among United States adults 1999-2004.1999 - 2004年美国成年人高血压的患病率、知晓率、治疗率及控制率
Hypertension. 2007 Jan;49(1):69-75. doi: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000252676.46043.18. Epub 2006 Dec 11.
7
Effect of a pharmacy care program on medication adherence and persistence, blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: a randomized controlled trial.一项药学服务项目对药物依从性、持续性、血压及低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的影响:一项随机对照试验
JAMA. 2006 Dec 6;296(21):2563-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.21.joc60162. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
8
Quality improvement strategies for hypertension management: a systematic review.高血压管理的质量改进策略:一项系统综述
Med Care. 2006 Jul;44(7):646-57. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000220260.30768.32.
9
Development of explicit criteria to measure adherence to hypertension guidelines.制定明确的标准以衡量对高血压指南的依从性。
J Hum Hypertens. 2006 Jun;20(6):426-33. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1002005.
10
Hypertension outcomes through blood pressure monitoring and evaluation by pharmacists (HOME study).通过药剂师进行血压监测与评估的高血压结局(家庭研究)
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Dec;20(12):1091-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0226.x.

医生与药剂师合作以改善血压控制。

Physician and pharmacist collaboration to improve blood pressure control.

作者信息

Carter Barry L, Ardery Gail, Dawson Jeffrey D, James Paul A, Bergus George R, Doucette William R, Chrischilles Elizabeth A, Franciscus Carrie L, Xu Yinghui

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Iowa, Room 527, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 2009 Nov 23;169(21):1996-2002. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.358.

DOI:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.358
PMID:19933962
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2882170/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies have demonstrated that blood pressure (BP) control can be improved when clinical pharmacists assist with patient management. The objective of this study was to evaluate if a physician and pharmacist collaborative model in community-based medical offices could improve BP control.

METHODS

This was a prospective, cluster randomized, controlled clinical trial with clinics randomized to a control group (n = 3) or to an intervention group (n = 3). The study enrolled 402 patients (mean age, 58.3 years) with uncontrolled hypertension. Clinical pharmacists made drug therapy recommendations to physicians based on national guidelines. Research nurses performed BP measurements and 24-hour BP monitoring.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) guideline adherence scores increased from 49.4 (19.3) at baseline to 53.4 (18.1) at 6 months (8.1% increase) in the control group and from 40.4 (22.6) at baseline to 62.8 (13.5) at 6 months (55.4% increase) in the intervention group (P = .09 for adjusted between-group comparison). The mean BP decreased 6.8/4.5 mm Hg in the control group and 20.7/9.7 mm Hg in the intervention group (P < .05 for between-group systolic BP comparison). The adjusted difference in systolic BP was -12.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], -24.0 to 0.0) mm Hg, while the adjusted difference in diastolic BP was -1.8 (95% CI, -11.9 to 8.3) mm Hg. The 24-hour BP levels showed similar effect sizes. Blood pressure was controlled in 29.9% of patients in the control group and in 63.9% of patients in the intervention group (adjusted odds ratio, 3.2; 95% CI, 2.0-5.1; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

A physician and pharmacist collaborative intervention achieved significantly better mean BP and overall BP control rates compared with a control group. Additional research should be conducted to evaluate efficient strategies to implement team-based chronic disease management.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00201019.

摘要

背景

研究表明,临床药师协助患者管理时,血压(BP)控制情况可得到改善。本研究的目的是评估社区医疗诊所中医生与药师的协作模式能否改善血压控制。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、整群随机对照临床试验,诊所被随机分为对照组(n = 3)或干预组(n = 3)。该研究纳入了402例高血压未得到控制的患者(平均年龄58.3岁)。临床药师根据国家指南向医生提出药物治疗建议。研究护士进行血压测量和24小时血压监测。

结果

对照组的平均(标准差)指南依从性评分从基线时的49.4(19.3)增加到6个月时的53.4(18.1)(增加8.1%),干预组从基线时的40.4(22.6)增加到6个月时的62.8(13.5)(增加55.4%)(调整后的组间比较P = 0.09)。对照组的平均血压下降了6.8/4.5 mmHg,干预组下降了20.7/9.7 mmHg(组间收缩压比较P < 0.05)。收缩压的调整差异为-12.0(95%置信区间[CI],-24.0至0.0)mmHg,舒张压的调整差异为-1.8(95%CI,-11.9至8.3)mmHg。24小时血压水平显示出相似的效应量。对照组29.9%的患者血压得到控制,干预组为63.9%(调整后的优势比,3.2;95%CI,2.0 - 5.1;P < 0.001)。

结论

与对照组相比,医生与药师的协作干预在平均血压和总体血压控制率方面取得了显著更好的效果。应开展更多研究以评估实施基于团队的慢性病管理的有效策略。

试验注册

clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT00201019。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bbd/2882170/5363dcf11974/nihms192598f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bbd/2882170/5363dcf11974/nihms192598f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bbd/2882170/5363dcf11974/nihms192598f1.jpg