Song Dae Sub, Lee Youn Jeong, Jeong Ok Mi, Kim Yong Joo, Park Chan Hee, Yoo Jung Eun, Jeon Woo Jin, Kwon Jun Hun, Ha Gun Woo, Kang Bo Kyu, Lee Chul Seung, Kim Hye Kwon, Jung Byeong Yeal, Kim Jae Hong, Oh Jin Sik
Green Cross Veterinary Products, Youngin 446-569, Korea.
J Vet Sci. 2009 Dec;10(4):323-9. doi: 10.4142/jvs.2009.10.4.323.
Active serologic surveillance is necessary to control the spread of the avian influenza virus (AIV). In this study, we evaluated a commercially-available cELISA in terms of its ability to detect AIV antibodies in the sera of 3,358 animals from twelve species. cELISA detected antibodies against reference H1- through H15-subtype AIV strains without cross reactivity. Furthermore, the cELISA was able to detect antibodies produced following a challenge of the AIV H9N2 subtype in chickens, or following vaccination of the AIV H9 or H5 subtypes in chickens, ducks and geese. Next, we tested the sensitivity and specificity of the cELISA with sera from twelve different animal species, and compared these results with those obtained by the hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) test, the "gold standard" in AIV sera surveillance, a second commercially-available cELISA (IZS ELISA), or the agar gel precipitation (AGP) test. Compared with the HI test, the sensitivities and specificities of cELISA were 95% and 96% in chicken, 86% and 88% in duck, 97% and 100% in turkey, 100% and 87% in goose, and 91% and 97% in swine, respectively. The sensitivities and specificities of the cELISA in this study were higher than those of IZS ELISA for the duck, turkey, goose, and grey partridge sera samples. The results of AGP test against duck and turkey sera also showed significant correlation with the results of cELISA (R-value >0.9). In terms of flock sensitivity, the cELISA correlated better with the HI test than with commercially-available indirect ELISAs, with 100% flock sensitivity.
开展血清学主动监测对于控制禽流感病毒(AIV)传播至关重要。在本研究中,我们评估了一种市售竞争酶联免疫吸附测定法(cELISA)检测12个物种3358只动物血清中AIV抗体的能力。cELISA可检测针对H1至H15亚型AIV参考毒株的抗体,且无交叉反应。此外,cELISA能够检测鸡受到AIV H9N2亚型攻击后产生的抗体,或鸡、鸭和鹅接种AIV H9或H5亚型疫苗后产生的抗体。接下来,我们用12种不同动物的血清测试了cELISA的敏感性和特异性,并将这些结果与血凝抑制(HI)试验(AIV血清监测的“金标准”)、另一种市售cELISA(IZS ELISA)或琼脂凝胶沉淀(AGP)试验的结果进行比较。与HI试验相比,cELISA在鸡中的敏感性和特异性分别为95%和96%,在鸭中为86%和88%,在火鸡中为97%和100%,在鹅中为100%和87%,在猪中为91%和97%。本研究中cELISA对鸭、火鸡、鹅和灰山鹑血清样本的敏感性和特异性高于IZS ELISA。针对鸭和火鸡血清的AGP试验结果也与cELISA结果显示出显著相关性(R值>0.9)。在禽群敏感性方面,cELISA与HI试验的相关性优于市售间接ELISA,禽群敏感性为100%。