Department of Epidemiological Sciences (Biomathematics and Risk Research),Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA),The Elms,College Road,Sutton Bonington,Loughborough LE12 5RB,UK.
European Union Reference Laboratory for Avian Influenza and Newcastle Disease,APHA-Weybridge,Woodham Lane,Addlestone KT15 3NB,UK.
Epidemiol Infect. 2018 Feb;146(3):306-313. doi: 10.1017/S0950268817002898. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
Avian influenza virus (AIV) subtypes H5 and H7 can infect poultry causing low pathogenicity (LP) AI, but these LPAIVs may mutate to highly pathogenic AIV in chickens or turkeys causing high mortality, hence H5/H7 subtypes demand statutory intervention. Serological surveillance in the European Union provides evidence of H5/H7 AIV exposure in apparently healthy poultry. To identify the most sensitive screening method as the first step in an algorithm to provide evidence of H5/H7 AIV infection, the standard approach of H5/H7 antibody testing by haemagglutination inhibition (HI) was compared with an ELISA, which detects antibodies to all subtypes. Sera (n = 1055) from 74 commercial chicken flocks were tested by both methods. A Bayesian approach served to estimate diagnostic test sensitivities and specificities, without assuming any 'gold standard'. Sensitivity and specificity of the ELISA was 97% and 99.8%, and for H5/H7 HI 43% and 99.8%, respectively, although H5/H7 HI sensitivity varied considerably between infected flocks. ELISA therefore provides superior sensitivity for the screening of chicken flocks as part of an algorithm, which subsequently utilises H5/H7 HI to identify infection by these two subtypes. With the calculated sensitivity and specificity, testing nine sera per flock is sufficient to detect a flock seroprevalence of 30% with 95% probability.
禽流感病毒(AIV)亚型 H5 和 H7 可感染家禽引起低致病性(LP)AI,但这些 LPAIV 可能在鸡或火鸡中突变为高致病性 AIV,导致高死亡率,因此 H5/H7 亚型需要法定干预。欧盟的血清学监测提供了 H5/H7 AIV 在明显健康家禽中暴露的证据。为了确定最敏感的筛选方法作为提供 H5/H7 AIV 感染证据算法的第一步,通过血凝抑制(HI)检测 H5/H7 抗体的标准方法与检测所有亚型抗体的 ELISA 进行了比较。通过这两种方法检测了来自 74 个商业鸡群的 1055 份血清。贝叶斯方法用于估计诊断测试的敏感性和特异性,而无需假设任何“金标准”。ELISA 的敏感性和特异性分别为 97%和 99.8%,而 H5/H7 HI 的敏感性和特异性分别为 43%和 99.8%,尽管 H5/H7 HI 的敏感性在受感染的鸡群之间差异很大。因此,ELISA 为作为算法一部分的鸡群筛选提供了更高的敏感性,该算法随后利用 H5/H7 HI 来识别这两种亚型的感染。根据计算出的敏感性和特异性,每个鸡群检测 9 份血清足以以 95%的概率检测到 30%的鸡群血清阳性率。