• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本行政数据库中创伤患者的损伤严重程度评分、资源利用及预后

Injury severity score, resource use, and outcome for trauma patients within a Japanese administrative database.

作者信息

Kuwabara Kazuaki, Matsuda Shinya, Imanaka Yuichi, Fushimi Kiyohide, Hashimoto Hideki, Ishikawa Koichi B, Horiguchi Hiromasa, Hayashida Kenshi, Fujimori Kenji, Ikeda Shunya, Yasunaga Hideo

机构信息

Department of Health Care Administration and Management, School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

出版信息

J Trauma. 2010 Feb;68(2):463-70. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a60275.

DOI:10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a60275
PMID:19935111
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Injury Severity Score (ISS) is commonly used in prediction models and risk adjustment for mortality. However, few studies have assessed the relationship of ISS to outcomes such as resource use. To test the utility of ISS for investigation of the quality of trauma care, we evaluated the impact of ISS on resource utilization and mortality.

METHODS

Of 1,895,249 cases from a Japanese administrative database in 2006, 13,627 trauma patients with ISS were analyzed. Variables included demographics, ISS, number and locations of injured organs, comorbidities, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures recorded during hospitalization, and hospital type. Dependent variables were length of stay (LOS), total charges (TC), initial 48-hour TC, high outliers of LOS or TC, and mortality. Multivariate analyses were used to measure the impact of ISS.

RESULTS

ISS 1 to 9 was most frequent (85.5%) and blunt injury occurred in 93.7% of patients. With increasing ISS, the mortality rate rose to 27.2% at ISS >or=36. LOS was higher at ISS >or=36 whereas TC was higher at 25 to 35. After controlling for study variables, rehabilitation was most strongly associated with LOS, TC, and LOS outliers. ISS 25 to 35 affected initial 48-hour TC most, while ventilation affected mortality most. "Abdomen, pelvic organs" and ISS 25 to 35 or >or=36 were more strongly associated with outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Specific ISS and injured organs may be used to estimate resource use or mortality for monitoring quality of trauma care. To integrate a more efficient system of trauma care, variations in resource input among hospitals should be investigated.

摘要

背景

损伤严重度评分(ISS)常用于预测模型和死亡率的风险调整。然而,很少有研究评估ISS与诸如资源利用等结果之间的关系。为了测试ISS在创伤护理质量调查中的效用,我们评估了ISS对资源利用和死亡率的影响。

方法

对2006年日本行政数据库中的1,895,249例病例进行分析,其中13,627例有ISS的创伤患者纳入研究。变量包括人口统计学特征、ISS、受伤器官的数量和位置、合并症、住院期间记录的诊断和治疗程序以及医院类型。因变量为住院时间(LOS)、总费用(TC)、最初48小时的TC、LOS或TC的高异常值以及死亡率。采用多变量分析来衡量ISS的影响。

结果

ISS 1至9最为常见(85.5%),93.7%的患者为钝性损伤。随着ISS增加,当ISS≥36时死亡率升至27.2%。ISS≥36时LOS较高,而25至35时TC较高。在控制研究变量后,康复与LOS、TC和LOS异常值的相关性最强。ISS 25至35对最初48小时的TC影响最大,而通气对死亡率影响最大。“腹部、盆腔器官”以及ISS 25至35或≥36与结果的相关性更强。

结论

特定的ISS和受伤器官可用于估计资源利用或死亡率,以监测创伤护理质量。为了整合更高效的创伤护理系统,应调查医院之间资源投入的差异。

相似文献

1
Injury severity score, resource use, and outcome for trauma patients within a Japanese administrative database.日本行政数据库中创伤患者的损伤严重程度评分、资源利用及预后
J Trauma. 2010 Feb;68(2):463-70. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a60275.
2
"Shift work" improves survival and reduces intensive care unit use in seriously injured patients.“轮班工作”可提高重伤患者的生存率并减少重症监护病房的使用。
Am Surg. 2007 Feb;73(2):185-91.
3
Outcomes and costs of penetrating trauma injury in England and Wales.英格兰和威尔士穿透性创伤损伤的结果与成本。
Injury. 2008 Sep;39(9):1013-25. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.01.012. Epub 2008 Apr 15.
4
Prediction of mortality in pediatric trauma patients: new injury severity score outperforms injury severity score in the severely injured.小儿创伤患者死亡率的预测:新损伤严重程度评分在重伤患者中优于损伤严重程度评分。
J Trauma. 2003 Dec;55(6):1083-7; discussion 1087-8. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000102175.58306.2A.
5
The effect of resident duty hour restriction on trauma center outcomes in teaching hospitals in the state of Pennsylvania.宾夕法尼亚州教学医院住院医师值班时长限制对创伤中心治疗效果的影响。
J Trauma. 2010 Sep;69(3):607-12; discussion 612-3. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e51211.
6
Outcomes and delivery of care in pediatric injury.小儿损伤的护理结果与实施
J Pediatr Surg. 2006 Jan;41(1):92-8; discussion 92-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.10.013.
7
The injury severity score or the new injury severity score for predicting mortality, intensive care unit admission and length of hospital stay: experience from a university hospital in a developing country.用于预测死亡率、重症监护病房入住率和住院时间的损伤严重度评分或新损伤严重度评分:来自一个发展中国家一所大学医院的经验
Injury. 2008 Jan;39(1):115-20. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.06.007. Epub 2007 Sep 18.
8
The presence of in-house attending trauma surgeons does not improve management or outcome of critically injured patients.医院内部创伤外科主治医生的存在并不能改善重伤患者的管理或治疗结果。
J Trauma. 2003 Jul;55(1):20-5. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000071621.39088.7B.
9
Assessment of severity, causes, and outcomes of hospitalized trauma patients at a major trauma center.对一家大型创伤中心住院创伤患者的严重程度、病因及预后进行评估。
J Trauma. 2009 Feb;66(2):516-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31816920db.
10
Probability of survival, early critical care process, and resource use in trauma patients.创伤患者的生存概率、早期重症监护过程及资源利用情况
Am J Emerg Med. 2010 Jul;28(6):673-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.02.030.

引用本文的文献

1
Estimating the health burden of road traffic injuries in Malawi using an individual-based model.使用基于个体的模型估算马拉维道路交通伤害的健康负担。
Inj Epidemiol. 2022 Jul 12;9(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40621-022-00386-6.
2
Australian Injury Comorbidity Indices (AICIs) to predict burden and readmission among hospital-admitted injury patients.澳大利亚损伤合并症指数(AICIs)预测住院损伤患者的负担和再入院率。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb 15;21(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06149-1.
3
Validation of age-specific survival prediction in pediatric patients with blunt trauma using trauma and injury severity score methodology: a ten-year Nationwide observational study.
使用创伤和损伤严重程度评分方法对钝性创伤儿科患者进行年龄特异性生存预测的验证:一项为期十年的全国性观察性研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2020 Nov 18;20(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12873-020-00385-0.
4
The Australian Injury Comorbidity Indices (AICIs) to predict in-hospital complications: A population-based data linkage study.澳大利亚损伤合并症指数(AICIs)预测住院并发症:一项基于人群的数据分析研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 11;15(9):e0238182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238182. eCollection 2020.
5
Factors influencing the use of health services by trauma patients according to insurance type and injury severity score in South Korea: Based on Andersen's behavioral model.根据安德森行为模型分析韩国创伤患者根据保险类型和损伤严重程度评分使用卫生服务的影响因素。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 27;15(8):e0238258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238258. eCollection 2020.
6
Complications, burden and in-hospital death among hospital treated injury patients in Victoria, Australia: a data linkage study.澳大利亚维多利亚州接受医院治疗的创伤患者的并发症、负担和院内死亡:一项数据链接研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 21;19(1):798. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7080-y.
7
Risk of hysterectomy and salpingectomy or oophorectomy compared to repair after pelvic gynecologic trauma.与盆腔妇科创伤修复相比,子宫切除术和输卵管切除术或卵巢切除术的风险。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019 Jun;45(3):403-410. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-0936-5. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
8
Impact of remifentanil use on early postoperative outcomes following brain tumor resection or rectal cancer surgery.瑞芬太尼对脑肿瘤切除或直肠癌手术后早期术后结果的影响。
J Anesth. 2012 Oct;26(5):711-20. doi: 10.1007/s00540-012-1397-3. Epub 2012 May 4.
9
In-hospital outcomes and cost assessment between bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate.比较双极与单极经尿道前列腺切除术的住院结局和成本评估。
J Endourol. 2012 Aug;26(8):1053-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0592. Epub 2012 Mar 19.
10
Impact of remifentanil introduction on practice patterns in general anesthesia.瑞芬太尼的引入对全身麻醉实践模式的影响。
J Anesth. 2011 Dec;25(6):864-71. doi: 10.1007/s00540-011-1221-5. Epub 2011 Sep 9.