• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较双极与单极经尿道前列腺切除术的住院结局和成本评估。

In-hospital outcomes and cost assessment between bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Shintoshi Hospital, Iwata, Japan.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2012 Aug;26(8):1053-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0592. Epub 2012 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1089/end.2011.0592
PMID:22296567
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3412058/
Abstract

PURPOSE

We compared the in-hospital outcomes between bipolar and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (B-TURP and M-TURP, respectively) on a real-world practice using a large database.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent TURP were extracted from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, which is a case-mix administrative claims database in Japan. TURP procedures were classified into M-TURP and B-TURP groups according to intraoperative use or nonuse of D-sorbitol solution, respectively, which is the only nonelectrolyte bladder irrigation fluid for M-TURP available in Japan. To exclude causality among autologous and homologous transfusion events, we confined eligible hospitals to those in which no autologous blood preparation was undertaken for TURP and whose annual surgical caseloads were 15 cases or more. Multivariate analyses were conducted for homologous transfusion, postoperative complications, operative time, postoperative length of stay, and total costs.

RESULTS

There were 5155 M-TURP and 1531 B-TURP patients identified. The results for M-TURP vs B-TURP (effect sizes were evaluated with reference to M-TURP) were 2.3% vs 1.3% for transfusion (odds ratio [OR]=0.54; P=0.013), 3.3% vs 1.7% for postoperative complications (OR=0.46; P<0.01), 98 vs 116 minutes for operative time (20.5% increase; P<0.001), 8.65 vs 8.45 days for postoperative stay (3.6% reduction; P=0.003), and $6103 vs $6062 for cost (1.7% reduction; P=0.018).

CONCLUSION

B-TURP had significantly lower rates of transfusion and postoperative complications, but a longer operative time. The impacts of B-TURP on shortening the hospital stay and lowering the costs were of little clinical significance.

摘要

目的

本研究通过使用大型数据库,在真实世界实践中比较双极和单极经尿道前列腺切除术(分别为 B-TURP 和 M-TURP)的住院期间结局。

方法

从日本诊断程序组合数据库中提取接受 TURP 治疗的患者。根据术中是否使用 D-山梨醇溶液(M-TURP 中唯一可用的非电解质膀胱冲洗液)将 TURP 手术分为 M-TURP 和 B-TURP 组。为了排除同源输血事件之间的因果关系,我们将合格医院限定为那些不进行 TURP 自体血准备且每年手术例数为 15 例或更多的医院。对同源输血、术后并发症、手术时间、术后住院时间和总费用进行多变量分析。

结果

共确定了 5155 例 M-TURP 和 1531 例 B-TURP 患者。M-TURP 与 B-TURP 的结果(以 M-TURP 为参照评估效应大小)为输血率分别为 2.3%和 1.3%(优势比[OR] = 0.54;P=0.013)、术后并发症发生率分别为 3.3%和 1.7%(OR = 0.46;P<0.01)、手术时间分别为 98 分钟和 116 分钟(增加 20.5%;P<0.001)、术后住院时间分别为 8.65 天和 8.45 天(减少 3.6%;P=0.003)和费用分别为 6103 美元和 6062 美元(减少 1.7%;P=0.018)。

结论

B-TURP 的输血率和术后并发症发生率显著降低,但手术时间较长。B-TURP 对缩短住院时间和降低成本的影响临床意义不大。

相似文献

1
In-hospital outcomes and cost assessment between bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate.比较双极与单极经尿道前列腺切除术的住院结局和成本评估。
J Endourol. 2012 Aug;26(8):1053-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0592. Epub 2012 Mar 19.
2
Economic Value of the Transurethral Resection in Saline System for Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in England and Wales: Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Cost-Consequence Model.英国和威尔士经尿道前列腺电切术治疗良性前列腺增生的经济价值:系统评价、荟萃分析和成本效益模型。
Eur Urol Focus. 2018 Mar;4(2):270-279. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.03.002. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
3
Comparison of bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate with standard transurethral prostatectomy: shorter stay, earlier catheter removal and fewer complications.双极经尿道前列腺切除术与标准经尿道前列腺切除术的比较:住院时间更短、导尿管拔除更早且并发症更少。
BJU Int. 2005 Jan;95(1):69-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05253.x.
4
Incidence of urethral stricture after bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate using TURis: results from a randomised trial.使用TURis进行双极经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)后尿道狭窄的发生率:一项随机试验的结果
BJU Int. 2015 Apr;115(4):644-52. doi: 10.1111/bju.12831. Epub 2014 Oct 24.
5
Prospective randomized study comparing monopolar with bipolar transurethral resection of prostate in benign prostatic obstruction: 36-month outcomes.前瞻性随机研究比较良性前列腺梗阻中经尿道前列腺切除术的单极与双极:36 个月的结果。
World J Urol. 2017 Oct;35(10):1595-1601. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2023-7. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
6
The Clinical Effect of Bipolar and Monopolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate More Than 60 Milliliters.前列腺体积超过60毫升的双极与单极经尿道前列腺切除术的临床效果
Urology. 2016 Dec;98:132-137. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.08.008. Epub 2016 Aug 15.
7
Results from an international multicentre double-blind randomized controlled trial on the perioperative efficacy and safety of bipolar vs monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate.国际多中心双盲随机对照试验研究双极与单极经尿道前列腺切除术围手术期疗效和安全性的结果。
BJU Int. 2012 Jan;109(2):240-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10222.x. Epub 2011 May 9.
8
Short-stay transurethral prostate surgery: A randomized controlled trial comparing transurethral resection in saline bipolar transurethral vaporization of the prostate with monopolar transurethral resection.短期经尿道前列腺手术:一项比较经尿道前列腺盐水双极汽化术与单极经尿道前列腺切除术的随机对照试验。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2015 Aug;8(3):316-22. doi: 10.1111/ases.12197. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
9
Safety and Efficacy of Bipolar Transurethral Resection of the Prostate Monopolar Transurethral Resection of Prostate in the Treatment of Moderate-Large Volume Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.双极经尿道前列腺切除术与单极经尿道前列腺切除术治疗中-大体积前列腺增生的安全性和疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Endourol. 2021 May;35(5):663-673. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0840. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
10
Bipolar transurethral resection versus monopolar transurethral resection for benign prostatic hypertrophy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.双极经尿道切除术与单极经尿道切除术治疗良性前列腺增生:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Endourol. 2014 Sep;28(9):1107-14. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0188. Epub 2014 Jun 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of bipolar TURP compared to monopolar TURP: A comprehensive literature review.双极经尿道前列腺切除术与单极经尿道前列腺切除术的疗效比较:一项全面的文献综述。
Turk J Urol. 2022 Jan;48(1):1-10. doi: 10.5152/tud.2022.21250.
2
Post-transurethral resection of prostate urethral strictures: Are they often underreported? A single-center retrospective observational cohort study.经尿道前列腺切除术后尿道狭窄:它们是否经常报告不足?一项单中心回顾性观察队列研究。
Urol Ann. 2021 Oct-Dec;13(4):329-335. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_165_19. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
3
A Cost-Benefit Analysis of Bipolar TURP for the Treatment of Bladder Outflow Obstruction.双极经尿道前列腺切除术治疗膀胱出口梗阻的成本效益分析
Res Rep Urol. 2021 Jul 9;13:487-494. doi: 10.2147/RRU.S277480. eCollection 2021.
4
Usefulness of bicarbonate Ringer's solution as perfusate during transurethral resection of the prostate.碳酸氢盐林格氏液在经尿道前列腺切除术中作为灌注液的效用。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021 Feb 10;21:100744. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100744. eCollection 2021 Mar.
5
Monopolar versus bipolar transurethral resection of prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: Operative outcomes and surgeon preferences, a real-world scenario.经尿道前列腺单极与双极切除术治疗良性前列腺增生:手术结果与术者偏好,真实世界情况
Urol Ann. 2016 Jul-Sep;8(3):291-6. doi: 10.4103/0974-7796.184900.
6
The TURis System for Transurethral Resection of the Prostate: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance.用于经尿道前列腺切除术的TURis系统:英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所医疗技术指南
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016 Jun;14(3):267-79. doi: 10.1007/s40258-015-0221-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Admissions related to interstitial cystitis in Japan: an estimation based on the Japanese diagnosis procedure combination database.在日本与间质性膀胱炎相关的住院治疗:基于日本诊断程序组合数据库的估计。
Int J Urol. 2012 Jan;19(1):86-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2011.02883.x. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
2
Cost containment and quality of care in Japan: is there a trade-off?日本的成本控制与医疗质量:二者是否存在取舍关系?
Lancet. 2011 Sep 24;378(9797):1174-82. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60987-2. Epub 2011 Aug 30.
3
Results from an international multicentre double-blind randomized controlled trial on the perioperative efficacy and safety of bipolar vs monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate.国际多中心双盲随机对照试验研究双极与单极经尿道前列腺切除术围手术期疗效和安全性的结果。
BJU Int. 2012 Jan;109(2):240-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10222.x. Epub 2011 May 9.
4
Impact of hospital volume and laser use on postoperative complications and in-hospital mortality in cases of benign prostate hyperplasia.医院容量和激光使用对良性前列腺增生患者术后并发症和住院死亡率的影响。
J Urol. 2011 Jun;185(6):2248-53. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.01.080. Epub 2011 Apr 16.
5
Perioperative management of transurethral surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a nationwide survey in Japan.日本良性前列腺增生经尿道手术的围手术期管理:一项全国性调查
Int J Urol. 2011 Apr;18(4):304-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2010.02712.x. Epub 2011 Jan 30.
6
Surgical procedures for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a nationwide survey in Japan.日本良性前列腺增生症的外科治疗:全国性调查。
Int J Urol. 2011 Feb;18(2):166-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2010.02687.x. Epub 2010 Dec 22.
7
Prediction of mortality after radical prostatectomy by Charlson comorbidity index.基于 Charlson 合并症指数预测根治性前列腺切除术后的死亡率。
Urology. 2010 Sep;76(3):553-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.02.069.
8
Bipolar transurethral resection in saline vs traditional monopolar resection of the prostate: results of a randomized trial with a 2-year follow-up.双极经尿道前列腺切除术与传统单极前列腺切除术治疗前列腺增生症的随机对照研究:2 年随访结果。
BJU Int. 2010 Nov;106(9):1339-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09401.x.
9
Impact of hospital volume on postoperative complications and in-hospital mortality after renal surgery: data from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination Database.医院手术量对肾手术后术后并发症和住院死亡率的影响:来自日本诊断程序组合数据库的数据。
Urology. 2010 Sep;76(3):548-52. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.03.021. Epub 2010 May 7.
10
Injury severity score, resource use, and outcome for trauma patients within a Japanese administrative database.日本行政数据库中创伤患者的损伤严重程度评分、资源利用及预后
J Trauma. 2010 Feb;68(2):463-70. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a60275.