• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

变应性鼻炎职业性变应原鼻激发试验的临床应用

Usefulness of nasal provocation tests in occupational rhinitis.

机构信息

Service de Physiologie-Explorations Fonctionnelles, Hôpital Henri Mondor, AP-HP, Creteil, France.

出版信息

Rhinology. 2009 Dec;47(4):432-7. doi: 10.4193/Rhin08.092.

DOI:10.4193/Rhin08.092
PMID:19936372
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to determine whether Nasal Provocation Tests (NPT) could help in the diagnosis of occupational rhinitis (OR).

METHODS

Changes in nasal airway resistance (NAR), measured by posterior rhinomanometry during specific nasal challenge associated with per and post test clinical scores, were compared to a prior probability, based on the patient's history, determined by occupational physicians, in 41 hairdressers and 33 bakers referred for suspected OR.

RESULTS

A DeltaNAR >or= 150% defined the positivity of the NPT. DeltaNAR demonstrated 50% sensitivity and a 86% specificity in hairdressers and a 95% sensitivity with 100 % specificity in bakers. DeltaNAR presented significant positive correlations with both per (p = 0.0003, r = 0.48) and post test clinical scores (p < 0.005, r = 0.39). The addition of clinical scores increased the sensitivity to 100% in hairdressers with 81% specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

The NPT constitutes a safe procedure of nasal reactivity with good levels of sensitivity and specificity in both hairdressers and bakers when nasal resistance and clinical scores are taken into account.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定鼻激发试验(NPT)是否有助于职业性鼻炎(OR)的诊断。

方法

通过后鼻测压法测量特定鼻挑战期间的鼻腔气道阻力(NAR)变化,并结合职业医生根据患者病史预先确定的概率(基于病史的先验概率),对 41 名美发师和 33 名面包师进行比较,这些美发师和面包师因疑似 OR 而接受检查。

结果

DeltaNAR≥150%定义了 NPT 的阳性。DeltaNAR 在美发师中的敏感性为 50%,特异性为 86%,在面包师中的敏感性为 95%,特异性为 100%。DeltaNAR 与即刻后临床评分均呈显著正相关(p=0.0003,r=0.48;p<0.005,r=0.39)。考虑到鼻腔阻力和临床评分,临床评分的增加使美发师的敏感性提高到 100%,特异性为 81%。

结论

NPT 是一种安全的鼻腔反应性检测方法,在考虑鼻腔阻力和临床评分的情况下,对美发师和面包师均具有良好的敏感性和特异性。

相似文献

1
Usefulness of nasal provocation tests in occupational rhinitis.变应性鼻炎职业性变应原鼻激发试验的临床应用
Rhinology. 2009 Dec;47(4):432-7. doi: 10.4193/Rhin08.092.
2
Nasal provocation test in the diagnostics of occupational allergic rhinitis.职业性变应性鼻炎诊断中的鼻激发试验
Rhinology. 1996 Jun;34(2):86-90.
3
Nasal provocation testing as an international standard for evaluation of allergic and nonallergic rhinitis.鼻激发试验作为评估变应性和非变应性鼻炎的国际标准。
Laryngoscope. 2005 Mar;115(3):512-6. doi: 10.1097/01.MLG.0000149682.56426.6B.
4
Use of nasal provocation test in the diagnostics of occupational rhinitis.鼻激发试验在职业性鼻炎诊断中的应用。
Rhinology. 2007 Mar;45(1):40-6.
5
House-dust mite nasal provocation: a diagnostic tool in perennial rhinitis.屋尘螨鼻腔激发:常年性鼻炎的诊断工具。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2010 Mar-Apr;24(2):133-6. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2010.24.3441.
6
Anterior rhinomanometry in nasal allergen challenges.鼻过敏原激发试验中的前鼻测压法
Allerg Immunol (Paris). 1998 Nov;30(9):295-7.
7
Diagnostic value of nasal provocation testing and rhinomanometry in allergic rhinitis.鼻激发试验和鼻阻力测量在变应性鼻炎中的诊断价值
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 1996 May-Jun;6(3):184-8.
8
Acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry and the amount of nasal secretion in the clinical monitoring of the nasal provocation test.鼻激发试验临床监测中的鼻声反射、鼻测压法及鼻分泌物量
Clin Exp Allergy. 1998 Apr;28(4):468-77. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.1998.00247.x.
9
[Evaluation of the nasal provocation test in perennial allergic rhinitis. I. Rhinitis caused by mites].常年性变应性鼻炎鼻激发试验的评估。I. 螨引起的鼻炎
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 1992 Jan-Feb;20(1):24-7.
10
Occupational allergy to wheat flour. Nasal response to specific inhalative challenge in asthma and rhinitis vs. isolated rhinitis: a comparative study.职业性小麦粉过敏。哮喘和鼻炎与单纯鼻炎患者对特异性吸入激发试验的鼻腔反应:一项比较研究。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2004;17(4):433-40.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk and safety requirements for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in allergology: World Allergy Organization Statement.过敏反应学诊断和治疗程序的风险与安全要求:世界过敏组织声明
World Allergy Organ J. 2016 Oct 12;9(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s40413-016-0122-3. eCollection 2016.
2
Allergic rhinitis: an updated overview.变应性鼻炎:最新概述。
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2012 Apr;12(2):99-103. doi: 10.1007/s11882-012-0242-y.