Hytönen M, Sala E
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.
Rhinology. 1996 Jun;34(2):86-90.
The diagnosis of occupational rhinitis (OR) must be better confirmed than in allergic rhinitis of other aetiology. A provocation test is required to confirm the causality between the disease and the work exposure. The purpose of this study has been to examine the feasibility of active anterior rhinomanometry and visual analogue scale in the diagnostics of OR, and to compare the results of these measurements to a nasal status change score. The study subjects have been 50 consecutive patients suspected of having OR. Altogether 148 bilateral nasal provocation tests (NPTs), 55 placebo- and 93 allergen-NPTs, have been done. Based on the change in the nasal status and change in the nasal airway resistance (NAR), there are 42 positive NPTs. Although overlapping between placebo and allergen provocations exists, an increase of > 50% in NAR is recommended to regard the result as positive in NPT. The evaluation of the nasal reaction in the NPT is mainly based on anterior rhinoscopy and the change in the status score, but OR diagnostics should also include some physiological measurement.
职业性鼻炎(OR)的诊断必须比其他病因引起的变应性鼻炎得到更确切的证实。需要进行激发试验来确认疾病与工作暴露之间的因果关系。本研究的目的是检验主动前鼻测压法和视觉模拟量表在职业性鼻炎诊断中的可行性,并将这些测量结果与鼻腔状态变化评分进行比较。研究对象为50例连续怀疑患有职业性鼻炎的患者。总共进行了148次双侧鼻激发试验(NPT),其中55次为安慰剂激发试验,93次为过敏原激发试验。根据鼻腔状态变化和鼻气道阻力(NAR)变化,有42次NPT结果为阳性。尽管安慰剂激发试验和过敏原激发试验之间存在重叠,但在NPT中,建议将NAR增加>50%视为阳性结果。NPT中鼻腔反应的评估主要基于前鼻镜检查和状态评分变化,但职业性鼻炎的诊断还应包括一些生理学测量。