Division on Addictions, Cambridge Health Alliance, 101 Station Landing, Medford, MA 02155, USA.
J Gambl Stud. 2010 Mar;26(1):129-44. doi: 10.1007/s10899-009-9157-5.
For more than a decade, casinos around the world have offered self-exclusion programs (SEPs) to gamblers seeking help with their gambling behavior. Despite the proliferation of SEPs, little is known about the long-term outcomes for gamblers who utilize these programs. The current study assessed the experiences of a sample (N = 113) of Missouri self-excluders (SEs) for as long as 10 years after their initial enrollment in the Missouri Voluntary Exclusion Program (MVEP). Most SEs had positive experiences with MVEP and reduced their gambling and gambling problems after enrollment. However, 50% of SEs who attempted to trespass at Missouri casinos after enrollment were able to, indicating that the benefit of MVEP was attributable more to the act of enrollment than enforcement. SEs who engaged in complementary treatment or self-help groups had more positive outcomes than those who did not, suggesting that SEPs ought to encourage and provide information about additional support and treatment options to participants.
十多年来,世界各地的赌场为寻求帮助控制赌博行为的赌徒提供了自我排除计划(SEP)。尽管 SEP 大量出现,但对于使用这些计划的赌徒的长期结果知之甚少。本研究评估了密苏里州自愿排除计划(MVEP)中 113 名自我排除者(SE)的样本的经历,最长可达他们最初注册后的 10 年。大多数 SE 对 MVEP 有积极的体验,并在注册后减少了赌博和赌博问题。然而,50%的 SE 在注册后试图在密苏里州赌场违规进入时成功了,这表明 MVEP 的好处更多地归因于注册本身,而不是执行。与没有参加的 SE 相比,参加补充治疗或自助小组的 SE 有更积极的结果,这表明 SEP 应该鼓励并向参与者提供有关其他支持和治疗选择的信息。