Håkansson Anders, Widinghoff Carolina
Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Psychiatry, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Malmö Addiction Center, Region Skåne, Malmö, Sweden.
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Dec 2;11:599967. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.599967. eCollection 2020.
Voluntary self-exclusion is a well-known harm reduction intervention in problem gambling, although primarily in operator-specific or venue-based systems. A nationwide overall self-exclusion system (") for all licensed gambling was introduced in Sweden in 2019. However, gambling in overseas companies despite national exclusion may be a concern in online gamblers. The present web survey study aimed to study self-reported self-exclusion and gambling despite exclusion in a nationwide multi-operator land-based/online exclusion system. Web survey in web panel members of a market survey company, carried out in May, 2020 (co-occurring with the COVID-19 pandemic). Past-year online gamblers ( = 997) answered questions about gambling patterns, gambling problems, psychological distress, self-exclusion since " introduction, and gambling despite self-exclusion. Seven percent reported ever self-excluded at , and this was associated with younger age, female gender, gambling problems, and chance-based games and online poker. In logistic regression, remained strongly associated with past-year online casino gambling, gambling problems, and absence of past-year sports betting. Among those having self-excluded, 38 percent reported gambling despite self-exclusion, most commonly online casino. In online gamblers in a setting with a nationwide self-exclusion system, using this was associated with past-year online casino gambling and gambling problems. Gambling despite self-exclusion appears to be common, and more commonly involves online casino. Stakeholders should aim to increase rates of self-exclusion in high-risk online gamblers, both during and beyond the COVID-19 situation in which the study was carried out. Also, policy makers should use gambling regulation in order to decrease the risk of breaching self-exclusion online, such as through the prohibition of non-registered gambling operators. Further research should focus on in-depth analysis of the reasons for gamblers to enroll or not enroll in multi-operator self-exclusion.
自愿自我排除是一种在问题赌博中广为人知的减少伤害干预措施,不过主要应用于特定运营商或场所的系统。2019年瑞典引入了针对所有持牌赌博的全国性全面自我排除系统(“”)。然而,尽管有全国性排除规定,但海外公司的赌博活动可能仍是在线赌徒的一个担忧问题。本网络调查研究旨在探讨在全国性多运营商陆地/在线排除系统中自我报告的自我排除情况以及排除后仍参与赌博的情况。2020年5月(与新冠疫情同时发生)对一家市场调查公司的网络面板成员进行了网络调查。过去一年的在线赌徒(n = 997)回答了有关赌博模式、赌博问题、心理困扰、自“”推出以来的自我排除情况以及排除后仍参与赌博的问题。7%的人报告曾在“”进行过自我排除,这与年龄较小、女性、赌博问题以及基于机会的游戏和在线扑克有关。在逻辑回归分析中,“”与过去一年的在线赌场赌博、赌博问题以及过去一年未参与体育博彩仍密切相关。在那些进行过自我排除的人中,38%的人报告排除后仍参与赌博,最常见的是在线赌场。在有全国性自我排除系统的环境中的在线赌徒中,使用该系统与过去一年的在线赌场赌博和赌博问题有关。排除后仍参与赌博似乎很常见,且更常见于在线赌场。利益相关者应致力于提高高风险在线赌徒的自我排除率,无论是在开展本研究的新冠疫情期间还是之后。此外,政策制定者应利用赌博监管措施来降低在线违反自我排除规定的风险,例如通过禁止未注册的赌博运营商。进一步的研究应侧重于深入分析赌徒参与或不参与多运营商自我排除的原因。