• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与开放性供体肾切除术的随机临床试验。

Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy.

作者信息

Nicholson M L, Kaushik M, Lewis G R R, Brook N R, Bagul A, Kay M D, Harper S J, Elwell R, Veitch P S

机构信息

Transplant Surgery Group, Department of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation, University of Leicester, Leicester General Hospital, Gwendolen Road, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2010 Jan;97(1):21-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6803.

DOI:10.1002/bjs.6803
PMID:19937983
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This randomized controlled trial was designed to determine the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) in comparison with short-incision open donor nephrectomy (ODN).

METHODS

Eighty-four live kidney donors were randomized in a 2 : 1 ratio to LDN (56 patients) or short-incision ODN without rib resection (28). Primary endpoints were pain relief and duration of inpatient stay.

RESULTS

There was no donor death or allograft thrombosis in either group. The first warm ischaemic time median (range) 4 (2-7) versus 2 (1-5) min; P = 0.001) and the duration of operation (160 (110-250) versus 150 (90-200); P = 0.004) were longer for LDN. LDN led to a reduction in parenteral morphine requirement 59 (6-136) versus 90 (35-312) mg; P = 0.001) and hospital stay (4 (2-6) versus 6 (2-9) days; P = 0.001), and earlier return to employment (42 (14-84) versus 66.5 (14-112) days; P = 0.004). Postoperative respiratory function was improved after LDN. There were more postoperative complications per donor in the ODN group (0.6(0.7) versus 0.3(0.5); P = 0.033). At a median follow-up of 74 months, there were no differences in renal function or allograft survival between the groups.

CONCLUSION

LDN removes some of the disincentives to live donation without compromising the outcome of the recipient transplant.

摘要

背景

本随机对照试验旨在确定腹腔镜供肾切除术(LDN)与小切口开放性供肾切除术(ODN)相比的安全性和有效性。

方法

84名活体肾供者按2:1的比例随机分为LDN组(56例患者)或不切除肋骨的小切口ODN组(28例)。主要终点是疼痛缓解情况和住院时间。

结果

两组均未发生供者死亡或移植肾血栓形成。LDN组的首次热缺血时间中位数(范围)为4(2 - 7)分钟,而ODN组为2(1 - 5)分钟;P = 0.001),且手术时间更长(160(110 - 250)分钟对150(90 - 200)分钟;P = 0.004)。LDN组减少了胃肠外吗啡用量(59(6 - 136)毫克对90(35 - 312)毫克;P = 0.001)和住院时间(4(2 - 6)天对6(2 - 9)天;P = 0.001),并更早恢复工作(42(14 - 84)天对66.5(14 - 112)天;P = 0.004)。LDN术后呼吸功能得到改善。ODN组每个供者的术后并发症更多(0.6(0.7)对0.3(0.5);P = 0.033)。在中位随访74个月时,两组间肾功能或移植肾存活率无差异。

结论

LDN消除了一些活体肾捐献的阻碍因素,同时不影响受者移植的结果。

相似文献

1
Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy.腹腔镜与开放性供体肾切除术的随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2010 Jan;97(1):21-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6803.
2
Why potential live renal donors prefer laparoscopic nephrectomy: a survey of live donor attitudes.潜在活体肾供体为何更倾向于腹腔镜肾切除术:对活体供体态度的一项调查
BJU Int. 2007 Dec;100(6):1344-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07126.x. Epub 2007 Sep 11.
3
Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: impact on an established renal transplant program.腹腔镜供体肾切除术:对一个成熟肾移植项目的影响。
Am Surg. 2000 Dec;66(12):1132-5.
4
Comparison of laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy: a randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜与开放性供肾切除术的比较:一项随机对照试验。
BJU Int. 2005 Apr;95(6):851-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05415.x.
5
Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: a single-center sequential experience comparing hand-assisted versus standard technique.腹腔镜活体供肾切除术:单中心比较手辅助与标准技术的序贯经验。
Urology. 2007 Dec;70(6):1060-3. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.07.018.
6
Donor nephrectomy: mini-incision muscle-splitting open approach versus laparoscopy.供体肾切除术:小切口肌肉劈开开放手术与腹腔镜手术的比较
Transplantation. 2006 Mar 27;81(6):881-7. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000203320.74256.fd.
7
Open versus laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in live related renal transplantation.活体亲属肾移植中开放与腹腔镜供肾切除术的比较
Transplant Proc. 2004 Nov;36(9):2620-2. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.10.024.
8
A comparison of traditional open, minimal-incision donor nephrectomy and laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.传统开放性供肾切除术、微创供肾切除术与腹腔镜供肾切除术的比较。
Transpl Int. 2004 Nov;17(10):589-95. doi: 10.1007/s00147-004-0770-z. Epub 2004 Oct 29.
9
Laparoscopic vs open living donor nephrectomy: a contemporary series from one centre.腹腔镜与开放活体供肾肾切除术:来自一个中心的当代系列研究
BJU Int. 2006 Jul;98(1):133-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06265.x.
10
Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a comparative study with conventional open donor nephrectomy in a single Chinese center.手辅助腹腔镜供肾切除术:在中国单一中心与传统开放性供肾切除术的比较研究
Transplant Proc. 2008 Dec;40(10):3362-4. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.05.081.

引用本文的文献

1
A bidirectional cohort study to compare the outcomes of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches in subjects undergoing laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy.一项双向队列研究,比较接受腹腔镜活体供肾切除术的受试者经腹腔和经腹膜后途径的手术结果。
Curr Urol. 2025 May;19(3):218-223. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000220. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
2
Incisional hernia incidence following laparoscopic versus open abdominal surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.腹腔镜与开腹手术切口疝发生率:随机对照试验的最新系统评价与Meta分析
Hernia. 2025 Apr 30;29(1):152. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03347-2.
3
Laparoscopic Hand-Assisted Donor Nephrectomy: A Decade of Single-Center Experience and Outcomes.
腹腔镜手辅助供体肾切除术:单中心十年经验与结果
Urol Res Pract. 2025 Apr 4;50(6):355-358. doi: 10.5152/tud.2025.24161.
4
Retroperitoneal robot-assisted live-donor nephrectomy: A single-center study.腹膜后机器人辅助活体供肾肾切除术:一项单中心研究。
Front Transplant. 2023 Apr 26;2:1062240. doi: 10.3389/frtra.2023.1062240. eCollection 2023.
5
Robotic performance metrics model fellow proficiency in living donor nephrectomy.机器人手术表现指标模型可衡量活体供肾切除术医生的熟练度。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jun 27;18(1):271. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02032-3.
6
Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors.机器人辅助与腹腔镜辅助与开放性肾切除术用于活体供肾者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 9;5(5):CD006124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006124.pub3.
7
Global dissemination of minimally invasive living donor hepatectomy: What are the barriers?微创活体肝移植切除术的全球推广:障碍有哪些?
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 May 27;15(5):776-787. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i5.776.
8
Respecting living kidney donor autonomy: an argument for liberalising living kidney donor acceptance criteria.尊重活体肾脏捐献者的自主权:放宽活体肾脏捐献者接受标准的理由。
Monash Bioeth Rev. 2023 Dec;41(2):156-173. doi: 10.1007/s40592-022-00166-4. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
9
Super-Minimal Incision Technique in Pediatric Kidney Transplantation: A Paired Kidney Analysis.小儿肾移植中的超微小切口技术:配对肾分析
Front Pediatr. 2022 Apr 6;10:862552. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.862552. eCollection 2022.
10
Influential Factors and Personalized Prediction Model of Acute Pain Trajectories after Surgery for Renal Cell Carcinoma.肾癌手术后急性疼痛轨迹的影响因素及个性化预测模型
J Pers Med. 2022 Feb 26;12(3):360. doi: 10.3390/jpm12030360.