Clinical Psychopharmacology Unit, University College London, London, UK.
J Psychopharmacol. 2010 Feb;24(2):147-53. doi: 10.1177/0269881109106915. Epub 2009 Nov 25.
Nutt and colleagues' 'rational' scale to assess the harms of commonly used drugs was based on ratings by a panel of experts. This survey aimed to assess drug users' views of the harms of drugs using the same scale. As users' drug choices are not solely based on harms, we additionally assessed perceived benefits. The survey was hosted at http://www.nationaldrugsurvey.org. UK residents reported their experience of 20 commonly used substances; those with direct experience of a substance rated its physical, dependence-related and social harms as well as benefits. A total of 1501 users completed the survey. There was no correlation between the classification of the 20 drugs under the Misuse of Drugs Act and ranking of harms by users. Despite being unclassified substances, alcohol, solvents and tobacco were rated within the top ten most harmful drugs. There was a remarkably high correlation (r = 0.896) overall between rankings by users' and by experts. Ecstasy, cannabis and LSD were ranked highest by users on both acute and chronic benefits. These findings imply that users are relatively well informed about the harms associated with the drugs they use. They also suggest that the current UK legal classification system is not acting to inform users of the harms of psychoactive substances.
纳特及其同事用来评估常用药物危害的“合理”量表是基于专家组的评级。本调查旨在使用相同的量表评估吸毒者对药物危害的看法。由于吸毒者的药物选择并非完全基于危害,我们还评估了他们对药物的认知益处。该调查在 http://www.nationaldrugsurvey.org 进行。英国居民报告了他们对 20 种常用物质的体验;那些有直接使用某种物质经验的人对其身体、依赖相关和社会危害以及益处进行了评分。共有 1501 名用户完成了调查。《滥用药物法》下 20 种药物的分类与用户对危害的排名之间没有相关性。尽管是未分类物质,但酒精、溶剂和烟草的危害程度在十大最有害药物中排名靠前。用户排名和专家排名之间存在显著的高度相关性(r = 0.896)。摇头丸、大麻和 LSD 在急性和慢性益处方面都被用户评为最高。这些发现表明,用户对他们所使用的药物的危害有相对清晰的认识。这也表明,英国现行的法律分类系统并没有向使用者传达精神活性物质的危害。