University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2010 Feb;14(1):17-36. doi: 10.1177/1088868309351002. Epub 2009 Nov 25.
In a meta-analysis, the authors test the theoretical formulation that religiosity is a means for self-enhancement. The authors operationalized self-enhancement as socially desirable responding (SDR) and focused on three facets of religiosity: intrinsic, extrinsic, and religion-as-quest. Importantly, they assessed two moderators of the relation between SDR and religiosity. Macro-level culture reflected countries that varied in degree of religiosity (from high to low: United States, Canada, United Kingdom). Micro-level culture reflected U.S. universities high (Christian) versus low (secular) on religiosity. The results were generally consistent with the theoretical formulation. Both macro-level and micro-level culture moderated the relation between SDR and religiosity: This relation was more positive in samples that placed higher value on religiosity (United States > Canada > United Kingdom; Christian universities > secular universities). The evidence suggests that religiosity is partly in the service of self-enhancement.
在一项元分析中,作者检验了宗教信仰是自我提升手段的理论假设。作者将自我提升操作化为社会期望反应(SDR),并关注宗教信仰的三个方面:内在、外在和追求宗教。重要的是,他们评估了 SDR 和宗教信仰之间关系的两个调节变量。宏观文化反映了宗教信仰程度不同的国家(从高到低:美国、加拿大、英国)。微观文化反映了美国大学的宗教信仰程度(基督教对世俗)。结果总体上与理论假设一致。宏观文化和微观文化都调节了 SDR 和宗教信仰之间的关系:在更重视宗教信仰的样本中,这种关系更为积极(美国>加拿大>英国;基督教大学>世俗大学)。证据表明,宗教信仰在一定程度上是为了自我提升。