Dürlinger Florian, Goetz Thomas, Pietschnig Jakob
Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Liebiggasse 5, 1010 Wien, Austria.
J Intell. 2024 Jul 7;12(7):65. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12070065.
Negative associations of religiosity and intelligence are well established in psychological research. However, past studies have shown a substantial heterogeneity in reported effect strengths. Causes that may be able to explain the identified inconsistencies pertain to differing religiosity measurement modalities, participant ages, or possibly cohort effects due to changing societal values in terms of being religious. Moreover, little is known about intelligence associations with the religiosity-related yet distinct construct of spirituality. Here, we provide evidence for religiosity and crystallized intelligence, as well as spirituality and crystallized intelligence associations, in 14 cohorts from 1988 to 2022 ( = 35,093) in the General Social Survey data by means of primary data analyses and meta-analytical approaches. As expected, religiosity was non-trivially negatively associated ( = -0.13, < .001), but spirituality showed no meaningful association with crystallized intelligence ( = 0.03, < .001). Our results broadly generalized across age groups, cohorts, and analytical approaches, thus suggesting that religiosity and intelligence may possibly be functionally equivalent to a certain extent whilst spirituality represents a distinct construct that is not functionally equivalent.
宗教信仰与智力之间的负相关在心理学研究中已得到充分证实。然而,过去的研究表明,报告的效应强度存在很大的异质性。可能能够解释已发现的不一致性的原因包括不同的宗教信仰测量方式、参与者年龄,或者可能是由于社会宗教价值观变化导致的队列效应。此外,对于智力与宗教信仰相关但又不同的灵性概念之间的关联,人们了解甚少。在此,我们通过原始数据分析和元分析方法,在1988年至2022年的14个队列(n = 35,093)的综合社会调查数据中,为宗教信仰与晶体智力以及灵性与晶体智力之间的关联提供了证据。正如预期的那样,宗教信仰与晶体智力呈显著负相关(r = -0.13,p <.001),但灵性与晶体智力之间没有显著关联(r = 0.03,p <.001)。我们的结果在不同年龄组、队列和分析方法中具有广泛的普遍性,这表明宗教信仰和智力在一定程度上可能在功能上是等效的,而灵性则代表了一个在功能上不等效的独特概念。