Kominek P, Glasa M, Kominkova M
Crop Research Institute, Prague-Ruzyne, Czech Republic.
Acta Virol. 2009;53(4):281-5. doi: 10.4149/av_2009_04_281.
LN33 grapevine plants were artificially inoculated with budwoods originating from a field-cultivated Traminer grapevine which was naturally infected with Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 1 (GLRaV-1), Grapevine virus A (GVA), Grapevine virus B (GVB), Rupestris stem pitting-associated virus (RSPaV), and an unclassified tymovirus. Four years after inoculation, a comparison of the cane weights between healthy and infected grapevines did not show any significant difference. Corky bark symptoms or destructive effects of GVB infection never appeared on the infected grapevines. Dormant canes, sampled before the beginning of the vegetation period, were used for detection of grapevine viruses by ELISA or RT-PCR. ELISA turned out unexpectedly to be more effective than RT-PCR for detecting GLRaV-1 probably due to an insufficient specificity of the primers used, not reflecting the actual genetic variability of the virus. Distribution of viruses in the infected grapevines showed a different degree of irregularity in dependence on individual viruses. Therefore, in order to properly verify the sanitary status of grapevines under testing, several random samples from different parts of a tested plant have to be analyzed.
LN33葡萄植株被人工接种了来自田间种植的琼瑶浆葡萄的接穗,该琼瑶浆葡萄自然感染了葡萄卷叶相关病毒1(GLRaV-1)、葡萄病毒A(GVA)、葡萄病毒B(GVB)、河岸葡萄茎痘相关病毒(RSPaV)和一种未分类的番茄病毒。接种四年后,健康葡萄藤和受感染葡萄藤之间的茎干重量比较没有显示出任何显著差异。受感染的葡萄藤上从未出现过软木树皮症状或GVB感染的破坏作用。在生长季节开始前采集的休眠茎干用于通过ELISA或RT-PCR检测葡萄病毒。出乎意料的是,ELISA在检测GLRaV-1方面比RT-PCR更有效,这可能是由于所用引物的特异性不足,没有反映病毒的实际遗传变异性。受感染葡萄藤中病毒的分布因个别病毒而异,呈现出不同程度的不规则性。因此,为了正确验证被测葡萄藤的卫生状况,必须对被测植株不同部位的几个随机样本进行分析。