Suppr超能文献

在初治的艾滋病患者中,应用阿巴卡韦/拉米夫定(Kivexa)联合依非韦伦或洛匹那韦/利托那韦治疗的疗效和耐受性相当:一项为期 48 周、多中心、随机对照研究(Lake 研究)。

Similar antiviral efficacy and tolerability between efavirenz and lopinavir/ritonavir, administered with abacavir/lamivudine (Kivexa), in antiretroviral-naïve patients: a 48-week, multicentre, randomized study (Lake Study).

机构信息

Fundació Lluita contra SIDA, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Ctra de Canyet, s/n, 08916 Badalona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Antiviral Res. 2010 Feb;85(2):403-8. doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2009.11.008. Epub 2009 Nov 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although efavirenz and lopinavir/ritonavir(r) are both recommended antiretroviral agents in antiretroviral-naïve HIV-infected patients, there are few randomized comparisons of their efficacy and tolerability.

METHODS

A multicenter and randomized study was performed including 126 antiretroviral-naïve patients, randomly assigned to efavirenz+Kivexa (n=63) or lopinavir/r+Kivexa (n=63). Efficacy endpoints were the percentage of patients with HIV-RNA < or =50 copies/mL at week 48 and CD4 recovery. Safety was assessed by comparing toxicity and discontinuations. Statistical analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat (ITT) basis (Missing=Failure).

RESULTS

At week 48, 56.7% of patients in the efavirenz and 63.2% in the lopinavir/r groups showed HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL (P=0.770) (intention-to-treat analysis; Missing=Failure). Only 1 (1.53%) patient from each group experienced virological failure. CD4 values increased in both groups (298 cells in the efavirenz group, P=0.001; 249 cells in the lopinavir/r group, P=0.002; P=0.126 between groups). HDL-cholesterol only increased in the efavirenz group (from 39+/-12 mg/dL to 49+/-11; P=0.001). Discontinuations were more frequent in the lopinavir/r group (36.5% versus 28.5%; P=0.193), but more patients with efavirenz interrupted due to toxicity (11.1% versus 6.3%); most of them were attributed to hypersensitivity reaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar virological efficacy was observed for efavirenz and lopinavir/r, when administered with Kivexa in antiretroviral-naïve patients, while immunological improvement was slightly superior for efavirenz. The higher rate of discontinuation due to toxicity in the efavirenz group was related to a higher incidence of hypersensitivity reaction. Nowadays, the use of the new formulation of lopinavir/r and the HLA-B*5701 genotype test before starting abacavir should improve the safety profiles of these regimens.

摘要

背景

依非韦伦和洛匹那韦/利托那韦(r)都是推荐用于初治 HIV 感染者的抗逆转录病毒药物,但关于它们疗效和耐受性的随机比较研究较少。

方法

一项多中心、随机研究纳入了 126 例初治患者,随机分为依非韦伦+Kivexa(n=63)或洛匹那韦/利托那韦+Kivexa(n=63)组。疗效终点为第 48 周时 HIV-RNA<50 拷贝/mL 的患者比例和 CD4 恢复情况。通过比较毒性和停药率来评估安全性。采用意向治疗(ITT)原则进行统计分析(缺失值=失败)。

结果

第 48 周时,依非韦伦组和洛匹那韦/利托那韦组分别有 56.7%和 63.2%的患者 HIV-1 RNA<50 拷贝/mL(P=0.770)(ITT 分析;缺失值=失败)。每组各有 1 例(1.53%)患者发生病毒学失败。两组的 CD4 值均增加(依非韦伦组增加 298 个细胞,P=0.001;洛匹那韦/利托那韦组增加 249 个细胞,P=0.002;两组间差异无统计学意义,P=0.126)。只有依非韦伦组的高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C)升高(从 39+/-12mg/dL 升至 49+/-11mg/dL,P=0.001)。洛匹那韦/利托那韦组的停药率更高(36.5% vs 28.5%,P=0.193),但因毒性而停药的患者更多(依非韦伦组 11.1% vs 洛匹那韦/利托那韦组 6.3%),其中大多数归因于过敏反应。

结论

在初治患者中,依非韦伦联合 Kivexa 与洛匹那韦/利托那韦联合 Kivexa 的病毒学疗效相当,而依非韦伦组的免疫改善略好。依非韦伦组因毒性而停药率较高与过敏反应发生率较高有关。目前,新型洛匹那韦/利托那韦制剂的应用和开始应用阿巴卡韦前 HLA-B*5701 基因型检测应该会改善这些方案的安全性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验