London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
Lancet. 2009 Dec 19;374(9707):2104-2114. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61759-1. Epub 2009 Nov 26.
This Series has examined the health implications of policies aimed at tackling climate change. Assessments of mitigation strategies in four domains-household energy, transport, food and agriculture, and electricity generation-suggest an important message: that actions to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions often, although not always, entail net benefits for health. In some cases, the potential benefits seem to be substantial. This evidence provides an additional and immediate rationale for reductions in greenhouse-gas emissions beyond that of climate change mitigation alone. Climate change is an increasing and evolving threat to the health of populations worldwide. At the same time, major public health burdens remain in many regions. Climate change therefore adds further urgency to the task of addressing international health priorities, such as the UN Millennium Development Goals. Recognition that mitigation strategies can have substantial benefits for both health and climate protection offers the possibility of policy choices that are potentially both more cost effective and socially attractive than are those that address these priorities independently.
本专题探讨了旨在应对气候变化的政策对健康的影响。对四个领域(家庭能源、交通、食品和农业以及发电)的缓解策略评估表明了一个重要信息:减少温室气体排放的行动通常(尽管并非总是)会对健康带来净收益。在某些情况下,潜在的收益似乎相当可观。这一证据为减少温室气体排放提供了一个额外的、直接的理由,超出了单纯缓解气候变化的范畴。气候变化正在日益成为全世界人口健康的一个不断演变的威胁。与此同时,在许多地区,仍存在重大的公共卫生负担。因此,气候变化使应对国际卫生重点(如联合国千年发展目标)的任务更加紧迫。认识到缓解策略对健康和气候保护都有重大益处,为政策选择提供了可能性,这些政策选择在成本效益和社会吸引力方面可能优于那些单独应对这些重点的政策选择。