University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Lancet. 2009 Dec 12;374(9706):2006-15. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61715-3.
In this report, the third in this Series on health and climate change, we assess the changes in particle air pollution emissions and consequent effects on health that are likely to result from greenhouse-gas mitigation measures in the electricity generation sector in the European Union (EU), China, and India. We model the effect in 2030 of policies that aim to reduce total carbon dioxide (CO(2)) emissions by 50% by 2050 globally compared with the effect of emissions in 1990. We use three models: the POLES model, which identifies the distribution of production modes that give the desired CO(2) reductions and associated costs; the GAINS model, which estimates fine particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter 2.5 microm or less (PM(2.5)) concentrations; and a model to estimate the effect of PM(2.5) on mortality on the basis of the WHO's Comparative Risk Assessment methods. Changes in modes of production of electricity to reduce CO(2) emissions would, in all regions, reduce PM(2.5) and deaths caused by it, with the greatest effect in India and the smallest in the EU. Health benefits greatly offset costs of greenhouse-gas mitigation, especially in India where pollution is high and costs of mitigation are low. Our estimates are approximations but suggest clear health gains (co-benefits) through decarbonising electricity production, and provide additional information about the extent of such gains.
在本报告——本系列关于健康与气候变化的第三份报告中,我们评估了在欧盟、中国和印度的发电部门减少温室气体排放的情况下,空气中颗粒污染物排放的变化及其对健康的影响。我们模拟了旨在全球范围内到 2050 年将二氧化碳(CO2)排放量比 1990 年减少 50%的政策对 2030 年的影响。我们使用了三种模型:POLES 模型,该模型确定了产生所需 CO2 减排量和相关成本的生产模式分布;GAINS 模型,该模型估计了空气动力学直径为 2.5 微米或更小的细颗粒物(PM2.5)浓度;以及一个根据世卫组织比较风险评估方法估计 PM2.5 对死亡率影响的模型。减少 CO2 排放的电力生产模式的变化将在所有地区减少 PM2.5 和由此造成的死亡,在印度的影响最大,在欧盟的影响最小。与温室气体减排成本相比,健康效益大大抵消了成本,特别是在污染严重且减排成本较低的印度。我们的估计是近似值,但表明通过使电力生产脱碳可以带来明显的健康收益(共同效益),并提供了有关此类收益程度的更多信息。