Department of Neurology, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA.
Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, CA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Dec;57(12):2209-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02572.x. Epub 2009 Nov 23.
To compare primary care providers' (PCPs') perceptions about dementia and its care within their healthcare organization with perceptions of other common chronic conditions and to explore factors associated with differences.
Cross-sectional survey.
Three California healthcare organizations.
One hundred sixty-four PCPs.
PCPs' views about primary care for dementia were analyzed and compared with views about care for heart disease, diabetes mellitus, and selected other conditions. Differences in views about conditions according to PCP type (internists, family physicians) were assessed. Multivariate analysis examined relationships between provider and practice characteristics and views about dementia care.
More PCPs strongly agreed that older patients with dementia are difficult to manage (23.8%) than for heart disease (5.0%) or diabetes mellitus (6.3%); PCPs can improve quality of life for heart disease (58.9%) and diabetes mellitus (61.6%) than for dementia (30.9%); older patients should be routinely screened for heart disease (63.8%) and diabetes mellitus (67.7%) than dementia (55.5%); and their organizations have expertise/referral resources to manage diabetes mellitus (49.4%) and heart disease (51.8%) than dementia (21.1%). More PCPs reported almost effortless organizational care coordination for heart disease (13.0%) or diabetes mellitus (13.7%) than for dementia (5.6%), and a great deal or many opportunities for improvement in their ability to manage dementia (50.6%) than incontinence, depression, or hypertension (7.4-34.0%; all P<.05). Internists' views regarding dementia care were less optimistic than those of family physicians, but PCP type was unrelated to views on diabetes mellitus or heart disease.
Improving primary care management of dementia should directly address PCP concerns about expertise and referral resources, difficulty of care provision, and PCP views about prospects for patient improvement.
比较初级保健提供者(PCP)对其医疗保健组织内的痴呆症及其护理的看法与对其他常见慢性病的看法,并探讨与差异相关的因素。
横断面调查。
加利福尼亚州的三个医疗保健组织。
164 名 PCP。
分析了 PCP 对痴呆症初级保健的看法,并将其与对心脏病、糖尿病和其他选定疾病护理的看法进行了比较。根据 PCP 类型(内科医生、家庭医生)评估了对各种疾病看法的差异。多元分析检查了提供者和实践特征与痴呆症护理看法之间的关系。
与心脏病(5.0%)或糖尿病(6.3%)相比,更多的 PCP 强烈认为患有痴呆症的老年患者难以管理(23.8%);PCP 可以提高心脏病(58.9%)和糖尿病(61.6%)的生活质量,而不是痴呆症(30.9%);应常规筛查老年患者的心脏病(63.8%)和糖尿病(67.7%),而不是痴呆症(55.5%);其组织在管理糖尿病(49.4%)和心脏病(51.8%)方面具有专业知识/转诊资源,而不是痴呆症(21.1%)。与心脏病(13.0%)或糖尿病(13.7%)相比,更多的 PCP 报告说,其组织的护理协调几乎毫不费力(5.6%),并且有很大或很多机会提高他们管理痴呆症的能力(50.6%),而不是尿失禁、抑郁或高血压(7.4-34.0%;所有 P<.05)。与家庭医生相比,内科医生对痴呆症护理的看法不那么乐观,但 PCP 类型与对糖尿病或心脏病的看法无关。
改善痴呆症的初级保健管理应直接解决 PCP 对专业知识和转诊资源、护理提供难度以及 PCP 对患者改善前景的看法的关注。