• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动物模型中的认知冲动性:在双选择操作性任务中,反应时间和强化率在延迟不耐受中的作用。

Cognitive impulsivity in animal models: role of response time and reinforcing rate in delay intolerance with two-choice operant tasks.

机构信息

Section of Behavioural Neuroscience, Department of Cell Biology & Neurosciences, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Neuropharmacology. 2010 Mar-Apr;58(4-5):694-701. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2009.11.007. Epub 2009 Nov 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2009.11.007
PMID:19945469
Abstract

Impulsivity, a key symptom of ADHD (attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder), is also common in obsessive-compulsive and addictive disorders. There is rising interest in animal models of inhibitory-control impairment. Adolescent rats were tested daily in the intolerance-to-delay (ID) task (session 25 min, timeout 20 s), involving choice between either immediate small amount of food (SS), or larger amount of food after a delay (LL). The mixed 5-HT(1A/7) agonist (8-OH-DPAT, 0 or 0.060 mg/kg i.p.) was administered acutely just before the last three sessions at highest delays. In addition to the classical choice parameter (percent LL preference), the spontaneous waiting (termed response time, RT) occurring between end of a timeout (TO) and next nose-poke was calculated. The pace between consecutive reinforcer deliveries is given by the mean inter-trial interval (mITI, i.e. TO + RT). Hence, the impact of any given delay may be proportional to this pace and be expressed as delay-equivalent odds, i.e. the extent by which delays are multiples of the mITI. Data revealed that RT/mITI increased sharply from around 15 s/35 s to around 30 s/50 s when imposed delay changed from 30 s to 45 s (i.e. odds from 0.91 to 1.06). This suggests that rats adopted a strategy allowing them to keep in pace with perceived reinforcing rate. The increasing delay constraint directly influenced the length of rats' spontaneous waiting (RT) before next decision. For higher delays, with odds >1, rats shifted to a clear-cut SS preference, which is devoid of any exogenous temporal constraint. A challenge with 8-OH-DPAT (0 or 0.060 mg/kg i.p.) decreased impulsive choice but also increased RT. Thus, tapping onto 5-HT(1A/7) receptors slightly enhanced RT/mITI values, possibly reflecting ability of rats to cope with slower reinforcing rates and/or with delay-cancelled reward paces. In summary, delay-induced states of aversion may arise from the innate tendency to rely on a regular rate of reinforcement. Conversely, a drug-enhanced capacity to cope with delay may involve an internal ability to adjust expectancy about such a reinforcing rate.

摘要

冲动是注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的一个关键症状,在强迫症和成瘾障碍中也很常见。人们对抑制控制损伤的动物模型越来越感兴趣。青少年大鼠每天在不耐受延迟(ID)任务中接受测试(会议持续 25 分钟,超时 20 秒),涉及到立即选择少量食物(SS)或延迟后选择大量食物(LL)之间的选择。混合 5-HT(1A/7)激动剂(8-OH-DPAT,0 或 0.060mg/kg 腹腔注射)在最高延迟的最后三个会议前急性给药。除了经典的选择参数(LL 偏好百分比)外,还计算了在超时(TO)结束和下一次鼻刺之间发生的自发等待(称为反应时间,RT)。连续强化物传递之间的速度由平均试验间间隔(mITI,即 TO+RT)给出。因此,任何给定延迟的影响可能与该速度成正比,并表示为延迟等效几率,即延迟是 mITI 的倍数的程度。数据显示,当施加的延迟从 30 秒变为 45 秒时,RT/mITI 从大约 15 秒/35 秒急剧增加到大约 30 秒/50 秒(即几率从 0.91 变为 1.06)。这表明大鼠采用了一种策略,使它们能够与感知的强化率保持同步。不断增加的延迟约束直接影响大鼠在下一个决定前自发等待(RT)的时间长度。对于更高的延迟,几率大于 1,大鼠转变为明确的 SS 偏好,这种偏好没有任何外部时间约束。8-OH-DPAT(0 或 0.060mg/kg 腹腔注射)的挑战降低了冲动选择,但也增加了 RT。因此,稍微刺激 5-HT(1A/7)受体可提高 RT/mITI 值,可能反映了大鼠应对较慢强化率和/或延迟取消奖励速度的能力。总之,延迟引起的厌恶状态可能源于依赖于常规强化率的内在倾向。相反,药物增强应对延迟的能力可能涉及对这种强化率的期望进行内部调整的能力。

相似文献

1
Cognitive impulsivity in animal models: role of response time and reinforcing rate in delay intolerance with two-choice operant tasks.动物模型中的认知冲动性:在双选择操作性任务中,反应时间和强化率在延迟不耐受中的作用。
Neuropharmacology. 2010 Mar-Apr;58(4-5):694-701. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2009.11.007. Epub 2009 Nov 27.
2
Individual differences in choice (in)flexibility but not impulsivity in the common marmoset: an automated, operant-behavior choice task.个体在选择(不)灵活性方面的差异,但在普通狨猴中没有冲动性:一种自动化的操作性行为选择任务。
Behav Brain Res. 2013 Nov 1;256:554-63. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Sep 7.
3
Effects of delayed reinforcers on the behavior of an animal model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).延迟强化物对注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)动物模型行为的影响。
Behav Brain Res. 2005 Jul 1;162(1):47-61. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2005.02.034. Epub 2005 Apr 25.
4
Impulsive choice in a rodent model of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.注意力缺陷/多动障碍啮齿动物模型中的冲动选择
Behav Brain Res. 2008 Feb 11;187(1):146-52. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2007.09.008. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
5
Choice with delayed or uncertain reinforcers in rats: influence of timeout duration and session length.大鼠延迟或不确定强化物选择:超时时间和实验时长的影响。
Synapse. 2012 Sep;66(9):792-806. doi: 10.1002/syn.21570. Epub 2012 Jun 20.
6
Impulsive choice as a predictor of acquisition of IV cocaine self- administration and reinstatement of cocaine-seeking behavior in male and female rats.冲动选择作为雄性和雌性大鼠静脉注射可卡因自我给药习得及可卡因觅药行为恢复的预测指标。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 Apr;16(2):165-77. doi: 10.1037/1064-1297.16.2.165.
7
Differential effects of d-amphetamine on impulsive choice in spontaneously hypertensive and Wistar-Kyoto rats.右旋苯丙胺对自发性高血压大鼠和Wistar-Kyoto大鼠冲动选择的不同影响。
Behav Pharmacol. 2009 Sep;20(5-6):549-53. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0b013e3283305ee1.
8
Home cage testing of delay discounting in rats.大鼠延迟折扣的笼内测试。
Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1169-76. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1169.
9
Relationship of delay aversion and response inhibition to extinction learning, aggression, and sexual behaviour.延迟厌恶和反应抑制与消退学习、攻击行为及性行为的关系。
Behav Brain Res. 2006 Nov 25;175(1):75-81. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.08.003. Epub 2006 Sep 11.
10
Effects of quinolinic acid-induced lesions of the orbital prefrontal cortex on inter-temporal choice: a quantitative analysis.喹啉酸诱导眶前额叶皮质损伤对跨期选择的影响:一项定量分析。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2002 Dec;165(1):9-17. doi: 10.1007/s00213-002-1228-6. Epub 2002 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of 5-HT receptor antagonist on reward-based decision-making.5-羟色胺受体拮抗剂对基于奖励的决策的影响。
J Physiol Sci. 2019 Nov;69(6):1057-1069. doi: 10.1007/s12576-019-00725-1. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
2
5-HT antagonists decrease discounting rate without affecting sensitivity to reward magnitude in the delay discounting task in mice.5-HT 拮抗剂可降低延迟折扣任务中小鼠的折扣率,而不影响对奖赏大小的敏感性。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018 Sep;235(9):2619-2629. doi: 10.1007/s00213-018-4954-0. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
3
Behavioral Phenotyping of Dopamine Transporter Knockout Rats: Compulsive Traits, Motor Stereotypies, and Anhedonia.
多巴胺转运体基因敲除大鼠的行为表型分析:强迫行为特征、运动刻板行为及快感缺失
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Feb 22;9:43. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00043. eCollection 2018.
4
Adolescent transitions in reflexive and non-reflexive behavior: Review of fear conditioning and impulse control in rodent models.青少年在反射性和非反射性行为中的转变:啮齿动物模型中恐惧条件反射和冲动控制的综述。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Nov;70:33-45. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.06.026. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
5
Aging impairs deliberation and behavioral flexibility in inter-temporal choice.衰老会损害跨期选择中的审慎思考和行为灵活性。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2015 Mar 27;7:41. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2015.00041. eCollection 2015.
6
Prenatal corticosterone and adolescent URB597 administration modulate emotionality and CB1 receptor expression in mice.产前给予皮质酮和青春期给予URB597可调节小鼠的情绪和CB1受体表达。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2014 May;231(10):2131-44. doi: 10.1007/s00213-013-3367-3. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
7
Immunization with DAT fragments is associated with long-term striatal impairment, hyperactivity and reduced cognitive flexibility in mice.用 DAT 片段免疫会导致小鼠长期纹状体损伤、过度活跃和认知灵活性降低。
Behav Brain Funct. 2012 Nov 28;8:54. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-8-54.
8
Age-related differences in impulsivity among adolescent and adult Sprague-Dawley rats.青春期和成年斯普拉格-道利大鼠冲动性的年龄相关差异。
Behav Neurosci. 2012 Oct;126(5):735-41. doi: 10.1037/a0029697. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
9
Pregabalin- and topiramate-mediated regulation of cognitive and motor impulsivity in DBA/2 mice.普瑞巴林和托吡酯对 DBA/2 小鼠认知和运动冲动性的调节作用。
Br J Pharmacol. 2012 Sep;167(1):183-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.01981.x.