Centre of Pain Services, Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Bath, UK Centre of Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Pain. 2010 Jan;148(1):141-147. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2009.10.034. Epub 2009 Nov 28.
There is an increasing number of studies of acceptance, mindfulness, and values-based action in relation to chronic pain. Evidence from these studies suggests that these processes may be important for reducing the suffering and disability arising in these conditions. Taken together these processes entail an overarching process referred to as "psychological flexibility." While these processes have been studied in people with chronic pain contacted in specialty treatment centers, they have not yet been investigated in primary care. Thus, participants in this study were 239 adults with chronic pain surveyed in primary care, through contact with their General Practitioners (GPs), in the UK. They completed measures of acceptance of chronic pain, mindfulness, psychological acceptance, values-based action, health status, and GP visits related to pain. Correlation coefficients demonstrated significant relations between the components of psychological flexibility and the measures of health and GP visits. In regression analyses, including both pain intensity and psychological flexibility as potential predictors, psychological flexibility accounted for significant variance, DeltaR(2)=.039-.40 (3.9-40.0%). In these regression equations pain intensity accounted for an average of 9.2% of variance while psychological flexibility accounted for 24.1%. These data suggest that psychological flexibility may reduce the impact of chronic pain in patients with low to moderately complex problems outside of specialty care. Due to a particularly conservative recruitment strategy the overall response rate in this study was low and the generality of these results remains to be established.
越来越多的研究关注接受、正念和基于价值观的行动与慢性疼痛之间的关系。这些研究的证据表明,这些过程可能对减轻这些疾病中出现的痛苦和残疾很重要。这些过程共同构成了一个被称为“心理灵活性”的总体过程。虽然这些过程已经在专门治疗中心接触到的慢性疼痛患者中进行了研究,但它们尚未在初级保健中进行调查。因此,这项研究的参与者是英国初级保健中通过与他们的全科医生(GP)联系而接受调查的 239 名慢性疼痛成年人。他们完成了慢性疼痛接受度、正念、心理接受度、基于价值观的行动、健康状况和与疼痛相关的 GP 就诊的测量。相关系数表明心理灵活性的组成部分与健康和 GP 就诊的测量之间存在显著关系。在包括疼痛强度和心理灵活性作为潜在预测因素的回归分析中,心理灵活性解释了显著的差异,DeltaR(2)=.039-.40(3.9-40.0%)。在这些回归方程中,疼痛强度平均解释了 9.2%的方差,而心理灵活性解释了 24.1%。这些数据表明,心理灵活性可能会降低低至中度复杂问题患者在专科治疗之外的慢性疼痛的影响。由于一项特别保守的招募策略,本研究的总体回复率较低,这些结果的普遍性仍有待确定。