Suppr超能文献

用于牙科护理全身麻醉儿童的口服咪达唑仑术前用药。

Oral midazolam premedication for children undergoing general anaesthesia for dental care.

作者信息

Sheta Saad A, Alsarheed Maha

机构信息

Division of Anesthesiology, Department of Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, P.O. Box 60169, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Int J Pediatr. 2009;2009:274380. doi: 10.1155/2009/274380. Epub 2009 Apr 13.

Abstract

Objectives. To assess the efficacy and safety of injectable midazolam administered orally in 3 different doses in children undergoing complete dental rehabilitation under GA. Subjects and Methods. 60 children aged 2-6 years were enrolled in the study. The children were randomly assigned to one of 3 groups and received orally 0.5, 0.75, or 1.0 mg/kg of injectable midazolam mixed with apple juice 30 minutes before separation from parents. The following measurements were assessed: patient's acceptance of the medication, reaction to separation from parents, sedation scores, and recovery conditions. Results. More children were comfortable with parent separation in the group that received the 1.0 mg/kg dose (90%) compared to the group that received the 0.75 mg/kg dose (75%) and the group that received the 0.5 mg/kg dose (55%). The number of children who had desirable sedation was similar in the 0.75 mg/kg and 1.0 mg/kg dose groups. Twenty five percent of the children in the group that received the 0.5 mg/kg dose did not allow venepuncture before induction of GA, and induction of GA was poor for 20% of the children in this group. An increasing number of children scored excellent in terms of ease of venepuncture in 0.75 mg/kg dose group (10%) and in the 1.0 mg/kg dose group (20%) and in terms of induction of GA, 25% and 35%, respectively. Recovery of spontaneous ventilation and extubation was delayed by over 15 minutes in 2 children in the 1.0 mg/kg dose group. Conclusion. The dose of 0.75 mg/kg of injectable midazolam given orally as premedication is acceptable, effective, and safe.

摘要

目的。评估在全身麻醉下接受全面牙齿修复治疗的儿童口服三种不同剂量注射用咪达唑仑的疗效和安全性。对象与方法。60名2至6岁儿童纳入本研究。将儿童随机分为3组之一,在与父母分开前30分钟口服0.5、0.75或1.0mg/kg注射用咪达唑仑与苹果汁的混合液。评估以下指标:患者对药物的接受度、与父母分离的反应、镇静评分及恢复情况。结果。与接受0.75mg/kg剂量组(75%)和接受0.5mg/kg剂量组(55%)相比,接受1.0mg/kg剂量组中更多儿童对与父母分离感到舒适(90%)。0.75mg/kg和1.0mg/kg剂量组中达到理想镇静效果的儿童数量相似。接受0.5mg/kg剂量组中25%的儿童在全身麻醉诱导前不允许静脉穿刺,该组20%的儿童全身麻醉诱导效果不佳。在0.75mg/kg剂量组(10%)和1.0mg/kg剂量组(20%)中,越来越多儿童在静脉穿刺容易程度方面评分优秀,在全身麻醉诱导方面,分别有25%和35%的儿童评分优秀。1.0mg/kg剂量组中有2名儿童自主通气恢复和拔管延迟超过15分钟。结论。口服0.75mg/kg注射用咪达唑仑作为术前用药剂量是可接受的、有效的且安全的。

相似文献

1
Oral midazolam premedication for children undergoing general anaesthesia for dental care.
Int J Pediatr. 2009;2009:274380. doi: 10.1155/2009/274380. Epub 2009 Apr 13.
4
Injectable midazolam as oral premedicant in pediatric neurosurgery.
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2005 Oct;17(4):193-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ana.0000181719.86978.05.
7
Premedication with midazolam nasal spray: an alternative to oral midazolam in children.
Anesth Pain Med. 2012 Spring;1(4):248-51. doi: 10.5812/aapm.4567. Epub 2012 Apr 1.
8
Premedication with oral midazolam with or without parental presence.
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Apr;27(4):347-52. doi: 10.1097/eja.0b013e328331a3bb.
10
Efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine versus oral midazolam for paediatric premedication.
Indian J Anaesth. 2017 Feb;61(2):125-130. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.199850.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Pregabalin and Midazolam as Premedication in Children Undergoing General Anesthesia for Dental Treatment.
Anesth Pain Med. 2024 Dec 15;14(6):e149486. doi: 10.5812/aapm-149486. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Comparing the Sedative Effect of Oral and Intranasal Midazolam and their Effect on Behavior in Pediatric Dental Patients.
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 Jan-Feb;15(1):128-134. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2117.
5
Efficacy of oral midazolam for minimal and moderate sedation in pediatric patients: A systematic review.
Paediatr Anaesth. 2019 Nov;29(11):1094-1106. doi: 10.1111/pan.13747. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
6
Role of dexmedetomidine in pediatric dental sedation.
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Apr;19(2):83-90. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2019.19.2.83. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
7
A comparison of oral dexmedetomidine and oral midazolam as premedicants in children.
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Jan-Mar;35(1):36-40. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_20_18.
8
A comparison of oral midazolam and oral dexmedetomidine as premedication in pediatric anesthesia.
Saudi J Anaesth. 2016 Oct-Dec;10(4):390-394. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.177333.
10
Efficacy and Safety of Orally Administered Intravenous Midazolam Versus a Commercially Prepared Syrup.
Iran J Pediatr. 2015 Jun;25(3):e494. doi: 10.5812/ijp.25(3)2015.494. Epub 2015 Jun 27.

本文引用的文献

1
TOF count at corrugator supercilii reflects abdominal muscles relaxation better than at adductor pollicis.
Br J Anaesth. 2007 May;98(5):611-4. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem048. Epub 2007 Mar 23.
3
High levels of impulsivity may contraindicate midazolam premedication in children.
Can J Anaesth. 2006 Jan;53(1):73-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03021530.
4
Injectable midazolam as oral premedicant in pediatric neurosurgery.
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2005 Oct;17(4):193-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ana.0000181719.86978.05.
6
Children's preoperative anxiety and postoperative behaviour.
Paediatr Anaesth. 2003 Mar;13(3):188-204. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.00848.x.
7
Midazolam premedication in children: a comparison of two oral dosage formulations on sedation score and plasma midazolam levels.
Anesth Analg. 2003 Feb;96(2):392-5, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200302000-00017.
9
A comparison of three doses of a commercially prepared oral midazolam syrup in children.
Anesth Analg. 2002 Jan;94(1):37-43, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200201000-00007.
10
The management of preoperative anxiety in children: an update.
Anesth Analg. 2001 Jul;93(1):98-105. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200107000-00022.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验