Department of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation, Faculty of Medicine, Ufuk University, Mesa Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Apr;27(4):347-52. doi: 10.1097/eja.0b013e328331a3bb.
In this study, we aimed to investigate whether the combination of low-dose (0.25 mg kg(-1)) midazolam premedication with parental presence can effectively reduce anxiety at induction as well as provide a smoother emergence.
Institutional ethics committee approval and informed consent from one of the parents were obtained prior to the study. Sixty ASA grade I or II children undergoing surgery were enrolled in the study. Children were randomized to receive either 0.5 mg kg(-1) midazolam orally (group M) or 0.25 mg kg(-1) midazolam orally with parental presence (group MP) or parental presence alone (group P). The child's anxiety and sedation scores were evaluated as 1-4 points on the Anxiety Scale and as 0-4 points on the University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS), respectively, at the entrance to the operating room and for tolerance to the face mask. Heart rate, the mean arterial blood pressure and O2 saturation (%) were assessed at repeated intervals before and after induction. At the end of surgery, the child's Anxiety Scale score, UMSS score, Observer's Pain Scale (OPS) score and FLACC score were also assessed.
There were no differences between groups in demographic variables and duration of surgery or anaesthesia. Mean blood pressure changes were similar between groups at measured intervals, but the heart rate was higher in group M before and after induction of anaesthesia (P<0.05). UMSS score was greater in both midazolam groups (groups M and MP) in the preoperative period (P<0.05). Anxiety Scale scores for anxiolysis were higher in groups M and MP than in group P (less anxious and more sedated) at 20 min after premedication, at the entrance to the operating room and at mask tolerance time points (P<0.05). During recovery there was no significant difference in sedation, recovery scores or behavioural anxiety assessment between groups, Anxiety Scale score, UMSS score, FLACC score, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score and Observer's Pain Scale score in groups MP, M and P.
Preoperative administration of midazolam 0.5 mg kg(-1) for premedication alone, without parental presence at induction, and that of low-dose midazolam 0.25 mg kg(-1) for premedication with parental presence at induction are both equally effective in reducing separation anxiety and providing a smooth emergence. However, parental presence alone, without midazolam for premedication, is not an adequate approach for this outcome. If the environment for parental presence is convenient, the dose of midazolam may be reduced and induction and emergence conditions may still be of high quality.
本研究旨在探讨小剂量(0.25mg/kg)咪达唑仑预给药联合父母陪伴是否能有效减轻诱导时的焦虑,并提供更平稳的苏醒。
本研究获得机构伦理委员会批准,并获得其中一位家长的知情同意。纳入 60 名 ASA 分级 I 或 II 级行手术的儿童。患儿被随机分为三组:口服 0.5mg/kg 咪达唑仑(M 组)、口服 0.25mg/kg 咪达唑仑并联合父母陪伴(MP 组)或仅父母陪伴(P 组)。在进入手术室时和面罩耐受时,采用焦虑量表评估患儿的焦虑和镇静评分,分别为 1-4 分和 0-4 分。分别在诱导前和诱导后重复评估心率、平均动脉压和氧饱和度(%)。手术结束时,还评估患儿的焦虑量表评分、UMSS 评分、观察者疼痛量表(OPS)评分和 FLACC 评分。
三组患儿在人口统计学变量、手术或麻醉持续时间方面无差异。在测量的各时间点,各组的平均血压变化相似,但诱导麻醉前 M 组的心率更高(P<0.05)。术前,咪达唑仑组(M 组和 MP 组)的 UMSS 评分均较高(P<0.05)。与 P 组相比,预给药后 20 分钟、进入手术室时和面罩耐受时,M 组和 MP 组的焦虑量表评分均较低(焦虑减轻,镇静增加)(P<0.05)。在恢复期间,三组间镇静、恢复评分或行为焦虑评估无显著差异,MP、M 和 P 组的焦虑量表评分、UMSS 评分、FLACC 评分、视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分和观察者疼痛量表评分均无差异。
单独使用咪达唑仑 0.5mg/kg 进行预给药,诱导时无父母陪伴,以及在诱导时使用低剂量咪达唑仑 0.25mg/kg 进行预给药,联合父母陪伴,在减轻分离焦虑和提供平稳苏醒方面同样有效。然而,仅父母陪伴而不使用咪达唑仑预给药,并不是达到这一结果的合适方法。如果父母陪伴的环境方便,咪达唑仑的剂量可以减少,诱导和苏醒条件仍可能保持高质量。