Verma Ravi K, Paswan Anil, De Anisa, Gupta Surendra
Department of Anesthesia, Banaras Hindu University (BHU), Varanasi, India.
Anesth Pain Med. 2012 Spring;1(4):248-51. doi: 10.5812/aapm.4567. Epub 2012 Apr 1.
Midazolam is a water soluble benzodiazepine which is frequently administered by intravenous and oral routes in our institution. Its nasal spray has become recently available.
To compare the efficacy of midazolam administered orally and by intranasal spray, with the specific objective of assessing their efficacy in terms of acceptability to the patients, whether they achieve a satisfactory sedation score, and the overall ease of inducing general anesthesia.
Sixty healthy children of ASA grade I or II, aged 2-6 years who were undergoing elective surgery of approximately 30 minutes duration, were assigned to receive midazolam premedication in a randomized controlled trial. They were divided into 2 groups of 30 patients each. Group I: 30 patients received midazolam orally (parenteral solution mixed in honey). Group II: 30 patients received a commercially available midazolam nasal spray.
The study shows that children better accepted the drug when administered orally than when administered intranasally, although satisfactory sedation scores at 10 and 20 minutes were better in the nasal spray group than in the oral group [i.e., 6 (20%) vs. 0 (0%) at 10 min and 16 (53.3%) vs. 13 (43.3%), respectively]. Satisfactory ease of induction scores [24 (80%) vs. 13 (43.3%)], recovery times [11.63 ± 4.19 minutes vs. 25.20 ± 9.36 minutes], and post-anesthesia recovery scores were better in the nasal spray group (group II) than in the oral group (group I).
On the basis of our study, we conclude that nasal midazolam spray is acceptable and is a good alternative to oral midazolam as premedication in the pediatric population.
咪达唑仑是一种水溶性苯二氮䓬类药物,在我们机构中经常通过静脉和口服途径给药。其鼻喷雾剂最近已上市。
比较口服和鼻内喷雾给予咪达唑仑的疗效,具体目标是根据患者的可接受性、是否达到满意的镇静评分以及诱导全身麻醉的总体难易程度来评估其疗效。
在一项随机对照试验中,将60名年龄在2至6岁、ASA分级为I或II级、即将接受约30分钟择期手术的健康儿童分配接受咪达唑仑术前用药。他们被分为两组,每组30名患者。第一组:30名患者口服咪达唑仑(将注射用溶液混入蜂蜜中)。第二组:30名患者使用市售的咪达唑仑鼻喷雾剂。
研究表明,儿童口服药物时比鼻内给药时对药物的接受度更高,尽管鼻喷雾剂组在10分钟和20分钟时的满意镇静评分优于口服组[即10分钟时分别为6例(20%)对0例(0%),20分钟时分别为16例(53.3%)对13例(43.3%)]。鼻喷雾剂组(第二组)在诱导评分的满意度[24例(80%)对13例(43.3%)]、恢复时间[11.63±4.19分钟对25.20±9.36分钟]以及麻醉后恢复评分方面均优于口服组(第一组)。
根据我们的研究,我们得出结论,鼻用咪达唑仑喷雾剂是可接受的,并且作为儿科人群的术前用药是口服咪达唑仑的良好替代方案。