Janney Carol A, Richardson Caroline R, Holleman Robert G, Glasheen Cristie, Strath Scott J, Conroy Molly B, Kriska Andrea M
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ment Health Phys Act. 2008 Jun 1;1(1):9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.mhpa.2008.05.001.
To examine the relationship between physical activity levels measured objectively by accelerometry and the use of mental health services (MHS) in a representative sample of males and females. METHOD: NHANES 2003-2004 is a cross-sectional study of the civilian, non-institutionalized US adult population. Participants reported whether or not they had seen a mental health professional during the past 12 months. Three measures of daily physical activity (light minutes, moderate-vigorous minutes, and total activity counts) and sedentary minutes were determined by accelerometry. The relationship between physical activity and use of MHS was modeled with and without adjustments for potential socioeconomic and health confounders. RESULTS: Of the 1846 males and 1963 females included in this analysis, 7 and 8% reported seeing mental health professionals during the past 12 months, respectively. Men who used MHS were significantly less active than men who did not use MHS (227,700 versus 276,900 total activity counts, respectively, p < 0.05). Men who did not use MHS engaged in 38 min (95% CI 16.3, 59.0) more of light or moderate-vigorous physical activity per day than men who used MHS. Physical activity levels of women, regardless of MHS use, were significantly lower than men who did not use MHS. Differences in total physical activity between women who did and did not use MHS were small (1.3, 95% CI - 14.0, 11.4). CONCLUSION: Men and women who used MHS were relatively sedentary. Additional research is warranted to determine if increasing physical activity levels results in improved mental health in individuals who use MHS.
通过加速度计客观测量身体活动水平,探讨其与具有代表性的男性和女性样本中使用心理健康服务(MHS)之间的关系。方法:2003 - 2004年美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)是一项针对美国非机构化成年平民人口的横断面研究。参与者报告在过去12个月内是否看过心理健康专业人员。通过加速度计确定每日身体活动的三项指标(轻度活动分钟数、中度至剧烈活动分钟数和总活动计数)以及久坐分钟数。在对潜在的社会经济和健康混杂因素进行调整和未调整的情况下,对身体活动与使用MHS之间的关系进行建模。结果:在纳入本次分析的1846名男性和1963名女性中,分别有7%和8%的人报告在过去12个月内看过心理健康专业人员。使用MHS的男性明显比未使用MHS的男性活动量少(总活动计数分别为227,700和276,900,p < 0.05)。未使用MHS的男性每天进行轻度或中度至剧烈身体活动的时间比使用MHS的男性多38分钟(95%置信区间16.3, 59.0)。无论是否使用MHS,女性的身体活动水平均显著低于未使用MHS的男性。使用和未使用MHS的女性在总身体活动方面的差异较小(1.3,95%置信区间 - 14.0, 11.4)。结论:使用MHS的男性和女性相对久坐。有必要进行进一步研究,以确定增加身体活动水平是否能改善使用MHS个体的心理健康状况。