Walking Behavior Laboratory, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70808, USA.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E113. doi: 10.5888/pcd9.110332. Epub 2012 Jun 14.
The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) included accelerometry in the 2003-2006 data collection cycles. Researchers have used these data since their release in 2007, but the data have not been consistently treated, examined, or reported. The objective of this study was to aggregate data from studies using NHANES accelerometry data and to catalogue study decision rules, derived variables, and cut point definitions to facilitate a more uniform approach to these data.
We conducted a PubMed search of English-language articles published (or indicated as forthcoming) from January 2007 through December 2011. Our initial search yielded 74 articles, plus 1 article that was not indexed in PubMed. After excluding 21 articles, we extracted and tabulated details on 54 studies to permit comparison among studies.
The 54 articles represented various descriptive, methodological, and inferential analyses. Although some decision rules for treating data (eg, criteria for minimal wear-time) were consistently applied, cut point definitions used for accelerometer-derived variables (eg, time spent in various intensities of physical activity) were especially diverse.
Unique research questions may require equally unique analytical approaches; some inconsistency in approaches must be tolerated if scientific discovery is to be encouraged. This catalog provides a starting point for researchers to consider relevant and/or comparable accelerometer decision rules, derived variables, and cut point definitions for their own research questions.
国家健康和营养检查调查(NHANES)在 2003-2006 数据收集周期中包含了加速度计。自 2007 年发布以来,研究人员一直在使用这些数据,但这些数据并未得到一致的处理、检查或报告。本研究的目的是汇总使用 NHANES 加速度计数据的研究数据,并编制研究决策规则、衍生变量和切点定义目录,以促进对这些数据的更统一处理。
我们对 2007 年 1 月至 2011 年 12 月发表的(或表示即将发表的)英文文章进行了 PubMed 搜索。我们的初步搜索产生了 74 篇文章,加上 1 篇未在 PubMed 中索引的文章。在排除 21 篇文章后,我们提取并制表了 54 项研究的详细信息,以允许对这些研究进行比较。
这 54 篇文章代表了各种描述性、方法学和推理分析。尽管一些处理数据的决策规则(例如,最小佩戴时间标准)得到了一致应用,但用于加速度计衍生变量的切点定义(例如,各种强度的体力活动所花费的时间)特别多样化。
独特的研究问题可能需要同样独特的分析方法;如果要鼓励科学发现,就必须容忍一些方法上的不一致。这个目录为研究人员提供了一个起点,让他们考虑自己研究问题的相关和/或可比较的加速度计决策规则、衍生变量和切点定义。