Department of Pediatrics, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Strasse 2, Würzburg, Germany.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Apr 3;12:43. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-43.
The objective of this study was to validate physical activity questionnaires for cystic fibrosis (CF) against accelerometry and cycle ergometry.
41 patients with CF (12-42 years) completed the Habitual Activity Estimation Scale (HAES), the 7-Day Physical Activity Recall questionnaire (7D-PAR) and the Lipid Research Clinics questionnaire (LRC) and performed an incremental exercise test according to the Godfrey protocol up to volitional fatigue. Time spent in moderate and vigorous physical activity (MVPA) assessed objectively by accelerometry was related to the time spent in the respective activity categories by correlation analyses and calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Furthermore, the results of the exercise test were correlated with the results of the questionnaires.
Time spent in the categories 'hard','very hard' and 'hard & very hard' of the 7D-PAR (0.41 < r < 0.56) and 'active' (r = 0.33) of the HAES correlated significantly with MVPA. The activity levels of the LRC were not related to objectively determined physical activity. Significant ICCs were only observed between the 7D-PAR activitiy categories and MVPA (ICC = 0.40-0.44). Only the LRC showed moderate correlations with the exercise test (Wmax: r = 0.46, p = 0.002; VO2peak: r = 0.32, p = 0.041).
In conclusion, the activity categories 'hard' and 'very hard' of the 7D-PAR best reflected objectively measured MVPA. Since the association was at most moderate, the 7D-PAR may be selected to describe physical activity within a population. None of the evaluated questionnaires was able to generate valid physical activity data exercise performance data at the individual level. Neither did any of the questionnaires provide a valid assessment of aerobic fitness on an invidual level.
本研究旨在通过加速度计和踏车测力计验证用于囊性纤维化(CF)的体力活动问卷。
41 名 CF 患者(12-42 岁)完成了习惯性活动估计量表(HAES)、7 天体力活动回忆问卷(7D-PAR)和脂质研究诊所问卷(LRC),并根据 Godfrey 方案进行递增运动试验,直至达到自愿疲劳。通过相关性分析和计算组内相关系数(ICC),将加速度计客观评估的中高强度体力活动(MVPA)时间与相应活动类别的时间相关联。此外,还将运动试验的结果与问卷的结果相关联。
7D-PAR 中“困难”、“非常困难”和“困难和非常困难”类别(0.41<r<0.56)和 HAES 中的“活跃”(r=0.33)时间与 MVPA 显著相关。LRC 的活动水平与客观确定的体力活动无关。仅在 7D-PAR 活动类别与 MVPA 之间观察到显著的 ICC(ICC=0.40-0.44)。只有 LRC 与运动试验呈中度相关(Wmax:r=0.46,p=0.002;VO2peak:r=0.32,p=0.041)。
总之,7D-PAR 的“困难”和“非常困难”活动类别最能反映客观测量的 MVPA。由于相关性最高为中度,因此 7D-PAR 可用于描述人群中的体力活动。评估的问卷均无法在个体水平上生成有效的体力活动数据和运动表现数据。没有任何问卷能够在个体水平上对有氧健身进行有效评估。