Department of Trauma Surgery, General Hospital, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, Vienna, Austria.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010 Sep;18(9):1201-7. doi: 10.1007/s00167-009-0992-9. Epub 2009 Nov 28.
Based on biomechanical cadaver studies, anatomic double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) was introduced to achieve better stability in the knee, particularly in respect of rotatory loads. Previously, the success of ACL reconstruction was believed to be mainly dependent on correct positioning of the graft, irrespective of the number of reconstructed bundles for which computer-assisted surgery was developed to avoid malpositioning of the tunnel. The aim of the present study is to compare rotational and translational stability after computer-navigated standard single-bundle, and anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction. The authors investigated 55 consecutive patients who had undergone the single-bundle or double-bundle ACL reconstruction procedure with the use of autogenous hamstring tendon grafts and EndoButton fixation, and the patients had been followed for a minimum period of 24 months. Intraoperative, anteroposterior and rotational laxity was measured with the computer navigation system, and compared between groups. Both surgical procedures significantly reduced anteroposterior displacement (AP) and internal rotation (IR) of the tibia compared to the pre-operative ACL-deficient knee (P < 0.05). No significant differences were registered between groups with regard to anteroposterior displacement of the tibia. A significantly greater reduction in internal rotation was noted in the double-bundle group (15.6 degrees) compared to the single-bundle group (7.1 degrees). The IKDC and Lysholm score were significantly higher in the double-bundle group. However, the results were excellent in both groups. The use of a computer-assisted ACL reconstruction, which is a highly accurate method of graft placement, could be useful for inexperienced surgeons to avoid malposition. Whether double-bundle ACL reconstruction, which was associated with improved rotational laxity and significantly better IKDC and Lysholm scores compared to the standard single-bundle ACL reconstruction procedure, provide an influence in terms of avoiding osteoarthritis or meniscus degeneration, long-term results of at least 5 years are needed.
基于尸体生物力学研究,前交叉韧带(ACL)解剖双束重建被引入以实现膝关节更好的稳定性,特别是在旋转负荷方面。以前,ACL 重建的成功被认为主要取决于移植物的正确定位,而不管重建的束数如何,计算机辅助手术就是为了避免隧道的错位而开发的。本研究旨在比较计算机导航标准单束和解剖双束 ACL 重建后的旋转和平移稳定性。作者研究了 55 例连续接受 ACL 单束或双束重建术的患者,均使用自体腘绳肌腱移植物和 EndoButton 固定,患者随访时间至少 24 个月。使用计算机导航系统测量术中、前后和旋转松弛度,并进行组间比较。与 ACL 缺失的膝关节相比,两种手术均显著降低了胫骨的前后位移(AP)和内旋(IR)(P < 0.05)。两组之间胫骨前后位移无显著差异。与单束组相比,双束组的内旋明显减少(15.6 度)(P < 0.05)。双束组的 IKDC 和 Lysholm 评分明显较高。然而,两组的结果均为优秀。使用计算机辅助 ACL 重建是一种高度准确的移植物放置方法,对于经验不足的外科医生来说,这种方法有助于避免错位。与标准单束 ACL 重建相比,双束 ACL 重建在旋转松弛度方面有明显改善,并且 IKDC 和 Lysholm 评分明显提高,但在避免骨关节炎或半月板退变方面是否有影响还需要至少 5 年的长期结果。