• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[卫生机构质量评估表:一种教育工具]

[A quality evaluation tableau for health institutions: an educational tool].

作者信息

Moll Marie Christine, Decavel Frédérique, Merlet Christine

机构信息

CHU d'Angers.

出版信息

Rech Soins Infirm. 2009 Sep(98):19-27.

PMID:19947122
Abstract

For a few years, health institutions have had to comply with the certification and the need to establish the new governance. Thanks to the accreditation version 2 (obtained in 2005), the elaboration of the hospital project (adopted in October, 2006) and the organization in poles since 2006, the quality oriented management became a priority axis at the University Hospital of Angers. The strategic adaptation to quality requirements leads to develop the hospital management, more especially at the level of the clinical, medico technical and administrative poles. The elements of the hospital project including the part about the quality, risk and evaluation aim at being adapted by every pole according to the level of its project. This adaptation which is imposed to each pole manager requires a practical and educational accompaniment allowing at the same time to realize a diagnosis of the progress of the quality approach, a measure of the impact of the global impregnation within the institution and a comparison between pole. A eight axis dashboard with criteria and a user guide were developed from certification ISO 9001, the EFQM manual and the certification manual version 2 of the Healthcare High Authorities. The criteria are transcribed in an EXCEL grid ready to use. Succeeding in estimating your own quality system means that you demonstrate the maturity of the quality approach. The results of this evaluation confirmed those of the certification. The dashboard is a management structuring tool at the service of the multidisciplinary team. Two considerations emerge from these results: First of all, for the hospital top management, the axes to be improved emerge as a priority to determine and target the next annual action plans. The results also allow to support the auto evaluation for the certification version 2010 planned in January of the same year. It is a pragmatic tool which allows auto evaluation and comparison to estimate the pole performances. It is a strategic driving tool for the hospital, for the quality department and for the pole. The pole quality system evaluation dashboard for Healthcare institutions is a simple tool which allies strategy and performance for a better efficiency of the actions to be taken to improve the quality, the risk management and the evaluation of the poles for a better service to the hospital users.

摘要

几年来,卫生机构必须遵守认证要求并建立新的管理模式。得益于2005年获得的二级认证、2006年10月通过的医院项目以及自2006年起按科室进行的组织架构调整,以质量为导向的管理成为昂热大学医院的优先发展方向。对质量要求的战略调整促使医院管理不断发展,尤其是在临床、医疗技术和行政科室层面。医院项目中的各项内容,包括质量、风险和评估部分,旨在由各科室根据自身项目水平进行调整。这种对各科室负责人的强制调整需要实际的指导和培训,以便同时对质量改进方法的进展进行诊断、衡量整体渗透在机构内的影响以及科室之间的比较。根据ISO 9001认证、欧洲质量管理基金会(EFQM)手册以及医疗卫生高级管理部门的二级认证手册,开发了一个包含八个轴的仪表盘及标准和用户指南。这些标准被转录到一个随时可用的EXCEL表格中。成功评估自身质量体系意味着展示质量改进方法的成熟度。此次评估结果与认证结果相符。该仪表盘是为多学科团队服务的管理结构化工具。从这些结果中可以得出两点思考:首先,对于医院高层管理人员来说,需要改进的方面成为确定和制定下一年度行动计划的优先目标。这些结果还为同年1月计划进行的2010版认证的自我评估提供了支持。这是一个实用工具,可用于自我评估和比较,以评估科室绩效。它是医院、质量部门和科室的战略驱动工具。医疗卫生机构的科室质量体系评估仪表盘是一个简单工具,它将战略与绩效相结合,以便更高效地采取行动来提高质量、风险管理和科室评估,从而更好地为医院用户服务。

相似文献

1
[A quality evaluation tableau for health institutions: an educational tool].[卫生机构质量评估表:一种教育工具]
Rech Soins Infirm. 2009 Sep(98):19-27.
2
[Comparison of accreditation procedures, ISO 9000 certification procedures and total quality management. Personal experiences and application of quality assurance in a department of radiology and medical imaging].[认证程序、ISO 9000认证程序与全面质量管理的比较。放射科与医学影像科质量保证的个人经验及应用]
J Radiol. 1999 Apr;80(4):363-7.
3
Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.六西格玛:并非胆小者所能驾驭。
Radiol Manage. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):40-53.
4
[From accreditation to certification. Quality management in a radiology department].[从评审到认证。放射科的质量管理]
J Radiol. 1999 Dec;80(12):1629-32.
5
Incident reporting in one UK accident and emergency department.英国一家急诊科的事件报告。
Accid Emerg Nurs. 2006 Jan;14(1):27-37. doi: 10.1016/j.aaen.2005.10.001.
6
[Efficiency versus quality in the NHS, in Portugal: methodologies for evaluation].葡萄牙国民医疗服务体系中的效率与质量:评估方法
Acta Med Port. 2008 Sep-Oct;21(5):397-410. Epub 2009 Jan 16.
7
Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.实施和使用儿童保健质量指标:实践现状透视
Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 2):217-27.
8
[Developing quality indicators in hospitals: the COMPAQH project].[医院质量指标的制定:COMPAQH项目]
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2005 Sep;53 Spec No 1:1S22-30.
9
Critical pathway for the management of acute heart failure at the Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System: transforming performance measures into cardiac care.圣地亚哥退伍军人事务医疗系统急性心力衰竭管理的关键路径:将绩效指标转化为心脏护理。
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2008 Sep;7(3):153-72. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e31818207e4.
10
The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.美国国家癌症研究所全爱尔兰癌症会议。
Oncologist. 1999;4(4):275-277.