Gavrin Jonathan
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2009;23(4):374-9. doi: 10.3109/15360280903327336.
In my last Internet-related article, I speculated that social networking would be the coming wave in the effort to share knowledge among experts in various disciplines. At the time I did not know that a palliative care site on the World Wide Web (WWW), palliativedrugs.com, already provided the infrastructure for sharing expert knowledge in the field. The Web site is an excellent traditional formulary but it is primarily devoted to "unlicensed" ("off-label") use of medications in palliative care, something we in the specialty often do with little to support our interventions except shared knowledge and experience. There is nothing fancy about this Web site. In a good way, its format is a throwback to Web sites of the 1990s. In only the loosest sense can one describe it as "multimedia." Yet, it provides the perfect forum for expert knowledge and is a "must see" resource. Its existing content is voluminous and reliable, filtered and reviewed by renowned clinicians and educators in the field. Although its origin and structure were not specifically designed for social or professional networking, the Web site's format makes it a natural way for practitioners around the world to contribute to an ever-growing body of expertise in palliative care.
在我上一篇与互联网相关的文章中,我推测社交网络将成为各学科专家之间共享知识的下一个潮流。当时我并不知道万维网上有一个姑息治疗网站palliativedrugs.com,它已经为该领域的专家知识共享提供了基础设施。这个网站是一个出色的传统处方集,但 primarily devoted to “unlicensed”(“off-label”)use of medications in palliative care,这是我们这个专业领域的人经常做的事情,除了共享的知识和经验外,几乎没有什么能支持我们的干预措施。这个网站没什么特别之处。从好的方面来说,它的形式让人回想起20世纪90年代的网站。勉强可以将其描述为“多媒体”。然而,它为专家知识提供了完美的论坛,是一个“必看”的资源。其现有内容丰富且可靠,由该领域知名的临床医生和教育工作者进行筛选和审查。尽管它的起源和结构并非专门为社交或专业网络设计,但该网站的形式使其成为世界各地从业者为姑息治疗领域不断增长的专业知识做出贡献的自然方式。 (注:原文中primarily devoted to后面的内容未完整给出英文,所以翻译中此处保留英文表述。)