• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

骨内器械:三种骨内器械的随机对照试验。

Intraosseous devices: a randomized controlled trial comparing three intraosseous devices.

机构信息

Department of Surgery-Traumatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010 Jan-Mar;14(1):6-13. doi: 10.3109/10903120903349861.

DOI:10.3109/10903120903349861
PMID:19947861
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Access to the circulation is mandatory for adequate treatment in medical emergency situations. Intraosseous (IO) infusion is a safe, fast, and effective alternative for gaining access to the circulation, if intravenous access fails. In the last decade, the IO method gained renewed interest. New devices have been developed, such as the Bone Injection Gun (BIG) 15G/18G and the First Access for Shock and Trauma 1 (FAST1).

OBJECTIVE

To determine which IO needle is preferable for gaining IO access in patients requiring acute administration of fluids or medication in a prehospital setting.

METHODS

In this single-blind prospective randomized trial, the IO needles were added to the equipment of the helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) system. The HEMS nurses received training in proper use of all needles. Children (1-13 years) were randomized to the Jamshidi 15G or the BIG 18G, and adults (>or= 14 years) were randomized to the Jamshidi 15G, the BIG 15G, or the FAST1. All patients requiring acute administration of fluids or medication, without successful insertion of an intravenous (IV) catheter, were included. The IO needles were compared in terms of insertion time, success rate, bone marrow aspiration, adverse events during placement, and user satisfaction.

RESULTS

Sixty-five adult and 22 pediatric patients were included. The treatment groups were similar with respect to age, gender, mortality, and trauma mechanism (p >or= 0.05). The median insertion times ranged from 38 seconds for the Jamshidi 15G to 49 seconds for the BIG 15G and 62 seconds for the FAST1 (p = 0.004). The devices did not differ with respect to success rates (adults overall 80% and children overall 86%), complication rates, and user satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

The Jamshidi 15G needle could be placed significantly faster than the FAST1. The devices had similar success rates, complication rates, and user-friendliness. Intraosseous devices provide a safe, simple, and fast method for gaining access to the circulation in emergency situations.

摘要

简介

在医疗急救情况下,进入循环系统是充分治疗的必要条件。如果静脉通路建立失败,骨髓内(IO)输注是一种安全、快速且有效的替代方法。在过去十年中,IO 方法重新受到关注。已经开发了新的设备,例如 Bone Injection Gun(BIG)15G/18G 和 First Access for Shock and Trauma 1(FAST1)。

目的

确定在需要在院前环境中急性给予液体或药物的患者中,哪种 IO 针更适合获得 IO 通路。

方法

在这项单盲前瞻性随机试验中,IO 针被添加到直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)系统的设备中。HEMS 护士接受了正确使用所有针的培训。将儿童(1-13 岁)随机分为 Jamshidi 15G 或 BIG 18G,成人(> = 14 岁)随机分为 Jamshidi 15G、BIG 15G 或 FAST1。所有需要急性给予液体或药物但静脉(IV)导管插入不成功的患者均被纳入研究。比较了 IO 针的插入时间、成功率、骨髓抽吸、放置过程中的不良事件和用户满意度。

结果

纳入 65 例成人和 22 例儿科患者。治疗组在年龄、性别、死亡率和创伤机制方面相似(p> = 0.05)。插入时间中位数范围从 Jamshidi 15G 的 38 秒到 BIG 15G 的 49 秒和 FAST1 的 62 秒(p = 0.004)。这些设备在成功率(成人总体为 80%,儿童总体为 86%)、并发症发生率和用户满意度方面没有差异。

结论

Jamshidi 15G 针的插入速度明显快于 FAST1。这些设备具有相似的成功率、并发症发生率和用户友好性。IO 设备为在紧急情况下获得循环通路提供了一种安全、简单且快速的方法。

相似文献

1
Intraosseous devices: a randomized controlled trial comparing three intraosseous devices.骨内器械:三种骨内器械的随机对照试验。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2010 Jan-Mar;14(1):6-13. doi: 10.3109/10903120903349861.
2
Comparison of two intraosseous access devices in adult patients under resuscitation in the emergency department: A prospective, randomized study.两种在急诊科复苏中的成年患者的骨髓内通道设备的比较:一项前瞻性、随机研究。
Resuscitation. 2010 Aug;81(8):994-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.03.038.
3
Evaluation of success rate and access time for an adult sternal intraosseous device deployed in the prehospital setting.评估成人胸骨内置式骨内设备在院前环境中的成功率和接入时间。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2011 Apr;26(2):127-9. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X11000057.
4
Comparison of two mechanical intraosseous infusion devices: a pilot, randomized crossover trial.两种骨髓腔内输注装置的比较:一项初步随机交叉试验。
Resuscitation. 2009 Sep;80(9):1029-33. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.05.026. Epub 2009 Jul 7.
5
Intraosseous access in the prehospital setting: literature review.院前环境中的骨内通路:文献回顾。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2012 Oct;27(5):468-72. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X12001124. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
6
Consecutive field trials using two different intraosseous devices.使用两种不同骨内装置的连续现场试验。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2007 Apr-Jun;11(2):164-71. doi: 10.1080/10903120701205851.
7
The use of a powered device for intraosseous drug and fluid administration in a national EMS: a 4-year experience.在全国紧急医疗服务中使用动力装置进行骨内药物和液体输注:四年经验
J Trauma. 2008 Mar;64(3):650-4; discussion 654-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31814db2a6.
8
Prehospital intraosseus access with the bone injection gun by a helicopter-transported emergency medical team.直升机转运的急救医疗队使用骨注射枪进行院前骨内通路建立。
J Trauma. 2009 Jun;66(6):1739-41. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a3930b.
9
Powered intraosseous insertion provides safe and effective vascular access for pediatric emergency patients.动力性骨内穿刺置管可为儿科急诊患者提供安全有效的血管通路。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008 Jun;24(6):347-50. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318177a6fe.
10
Use of the pediatric EZ-IO needle by emergency medical services providers.紧急医疗服务人员对儿科EZ-IO穿刺针的使用。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2009 May;25(5):329-32. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3181a341fa.

引用本文的文献

1
Intraosseous line insertion for the primary health care physician.经皮穿刺骨内输液通路在基层医疗保健中的应用。
S Afr Fam Pract (2004). 2023 Mar 24;65(1):e1-e5. doi: 10.4102/safp.v65i1.5691.
2
Efficacy of intraosseous access for trauma resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮穿刺骨内通道在创伤复苏中的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Emerg Surg. 2023 Mar 14;18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13017-023-00487-7.
3
Sternal Intraosseous Devices: Review of the Literature.胸骨骨髓内器械:文献回顾。
West J Emerg Med. 2021 Mar 24;22(3):690-695. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2020.12.48939.
4
Intraosseous access in the resuscitation of trauma patients: a literature review.创伤患者复苏中的骨髓内通路:文献复习。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Feb;47(1):47-55. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01327-y. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
5
A Randomized Cadaver Study Comparing First-Attempt Success Between Tibial and Humeral Intraosseous Insertions Using NIO Device by Paramedics: A Preliminary Investigation.一项随机尸体研究:护理人员使用NIO装置比较胫骨和肱骨骨内插入首次尝试成功率的初步调查
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 May;95(20):e3724. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003724.
6
Invasive and surgical procedures in pre-hospital care: what is the need?院前急救中的侵入性和外科手术:需求是什么?
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2012 Dec;38(6):633-9. doi: 10.1007/s00068-012-0207-9. Epub 2012 Jul 13.
7
A randomized trial comparing two intraosseous access devices in intrahospital healthcare providers with a focus on retention of knowledge, skill, and self-efficacy.一项针对医院内医疗保健人员的随机试验,比较两种骨内输液装置,重点关注知识、技能和自我效能的保持。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2014 Oct;40(5):581-6. doi: 10.1007/s00068-014-0385-8. Epub 2014 Feb 22.
8
Effectiveness of a Drill-assisted Intraosseous Catheter versus Manual Intraosseous Catheter by Resident Physicians in a Swine Model.在猪模型中,住院医师使用钻头辅助与手动骨髓内导管的效果比较。
West J Emerg Med. 2013 Nov;14(6):629-32. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2013.4.13361.
9
Vascular access through the intraosseous route in pediatric emergencies.儿科急诊中经骨内途径的血管通路
Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2012 Dec;24(4):407-14. doi: 10.1590/s0103-507x2012000400019.
10
Advances in prehospital trauma care.院前创伤护理的进展。
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2011 Jan;1(1):44-50. doi: 10.4103/2229-5151.79281.