Hobgood Cherri, Bowen Josie Barnes, Brice Jane H, Overby Barbara, Tamayo-Sarver Joshua H
Department of Emergency Medicine, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2006 Jan-Mar;10(1):21-7. doi: 10.1080/10903120500366011.
To evaluate self-reports of prehospital providers' error frequency, disclosure, and reporting in their actual practice and in hypothetical scenarios.
The authors surveyed a convenience sample of prehospital providers attending a statewide emergency medical services conference using a two-part instrument. Part 1 evaluated respondent demographics and actual practice patterns. Part 2 used hypothetic scenarios to assess error identification, disclosure, and reporting patterns. Descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact tests were used to characterize demographics and practice patterns. For hypothetical scenarios, the authors calculated mean responses with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess error identification, anticipated disclosure, and reporting patterns.
The response rate was 88% (372/425). Analysis was limited to 283 (75% of 372) respondents who were emergency medical technicians and had complete data. In the previous year, 157 (55%) providers identified no errors in practice, 100 (35%) reported one or two errors, and 26 (9%) identified more than two errors. In approximately half of cases, identified errors were reported to the receiving provider, or supervisor. In hypothetical cases, severe errors were identified 93% (95% CI 92-94) of the time, but the ability of providers to identify mild errors significantly varied. In all scenarios, respondents were much more likely to report errors to the receiving hospital, their supervisor, and their medical director than to patients.
Prehospital providers demonstrate the capacity to identify, report, and, to a lesser extent, disclose errors in hypothetical scenarios but may not apply these skills uniformly in their own practices. Enhancing error management skills in prehospital clinical practice will require focused education and training.
评估院前急救人员在实际工作及假设情景中对自身差错发生频率、差错披露及上报情况的自我报告。
作者使用两部分式调查问卷,对参加全州紧急医疗服务会议的院前急救人员进行便利抽样调查。第一部分评估受访者的人口统计学特征及实际工作模式。第二部分使用假设情景来评估差错识别、披露及上报模式。采用描述性统计和费舍尔精确检验来描述人口统计学特征和工作模式。对于假设情景,作者计算了平均回复率及95%置信区间(CI),以评估差错识别、预期披露及上报模式。
回复率为88%(372/425)。分析仅限于283名(占372名的75%)急救医疗技术员且数据完整的受访者。在前一年,157名(55%)急救人员在实际工作中未发现差错,100名(35%)报告了一至两个差错,26名(9%)发现了两个以上差错。在大约一半的案例中,所发现的差错报告给了接收方急救人员或主管。在假设案例中,93%(95%CI 92 - 94)的情况下能识别出严重差错,但急救人员识别轻度差错的能力差异显著。在所有情景中,受访者向接收医院、主管及医疗主任报告差错的可能性远高于向患者报告。
院前急救人员在假设情景中具备识别、报告差错以及在较小程度上披露差错的能力,但可能未在自身实际工作中统一运用这些技能。提高院前临床实践中的差错管理技能需要有针对性的教育和培训。