Suppr超能文献

基层医疗环境中成年患者抑郁症的筛查:系统证据综述

Screening for depression in adult patients in primary care settings: a systematic evidence review.

作者信息

O'Connor Elizabeth A, Whitlock Evelyn P, Beil Tracy L, Gaynes Bradley N

机构信息

Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, 3800 North Interstate Avenue, Portland, OR 97227, USA.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2009 Dec 1;151(11):793-803. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-11-200912010-00007.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In primary care settings, prevalence estimates of major depressive disorder range from 5% to 13% in all adults, with lower estimates in those older than 55 years (6% to 9%). In 2002, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended screening adults for depression in clinical practices that have systems to ensure accurate diagnosis, effective treatment, and follow-up.

PURPOSE

To conduct a targeted, updated systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force about the benefits and harms of screening adult patients for depression in a primary care setting, the benefits of depression treatment in older adults, and the harms of depression treatment with antidepressant medications.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, PsycINFO (1998 to 2007), expert suggestions, and bibliographies of recent systematic reviews.

STUDY SELECTION

Fair- to good-quality randomized clinical trials or controlled clinical trials; systematic reviews; meta-analyses; and large observational studies of serious adverse events and early discontinuation due to adverse effects. All studies were published in English.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two investigators abstracted, critically appraised, and synthesized 33 articles that met inclusion criteria.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Nine fair- or good-quality trials indicate that primary care depression screening and care management programs with staff assistance, such as case management or mental health specialist involvement, can increase depression response and remission. Benefit was not evident in screening programs without staff assistance in depression care. Seven regulatory reviews or meta-analyses and 3 large cohort studies indicate no increased risk for completed suicide deaths with antidepressant treatment. Risk for suicidal behaviors was increased in young adults (aged 18 to 29 years) who received antidepressants, particularly those who received paroxetine, but was reduced in older adults.

LIMITATION

Examination of harms was limited to serious adverse events, and existing systematic reviews were primarily used. Additional studies published from 2007 to 2008 extend this review.

CONCLUSION

Depression screening programs without substantial staff-assisted depression care supports are unlikely to improve depression outcomes. Close monitoring of all adult patients who initiate antidepressant treatment, particularly those younger than 30 years, is important both for safety and to ensure optimal treatment.

摘要

背景

在初级保健机构中,所有成年人中重度抑郁症的患病率估计为5%至13%,55岁以上人群的患病率估计较低(6%至9%)。2002年,美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)建议在具备确保准确诊断、有效治疗和随访系统的临床实践中对成年人进行抑郁症筛查。

目的

为美国预防服务工作组进行一项有针对性的、更新的系统评价,内容涉及在初级保健机构中筛查成年患者抑郁症的益处和危害、老年人抑郁症治疗的益处以及使用抗抑郁药物治疗抑郁症的危害。

数据来源

MEDLINE、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库、Cochrane系统评价数据库、效果评价摘要数据库、PsycINFO(1998年至2007年)、专家建议以及近期系统评价的参考文献。

研究选择

中等到高质量的随机临床试验或对照临床试验;系统评价;荟萃分析;以及关于严重不良事件和因不良反应导致早期停药的大型观察性研究。所有研究均以英文发表。

数据提取

两名研究人员提取、严格评价并综合了33篇符合纳入标准的文章。

数据综合

九项中等到高质量的试验表明,有工作人员协助的初级保健抑郁症筛查和护理管理项目,如病例管理或心理健康专家参与,可以提高抑郁症的反应率和缓解率。在没有工作人员协助抑郁症护理的筛查项目中,益处并不明显。七项监管审查或荟萃分析以及三项大型队列研究表明,抗抑郁药物治疗不会增加自杀死亡的风险。接受抗抑郁药物治疗的年轻人(18至29岁)自杀行为的风险增加,尤其是接受帕罗西汀治疗的年轻人,但在老年人中风险降低。

局限性

对危害的审查仅限于严重不良事件,且主要使用了现有的系统评价。2007年至2008年发表的其他研究扩展了本评价。

结论

没有大量工作人员协助抑郁症护理支持的抑郁症筛查项目不太可能改善抑郁症的治疗效果。对所有开始抗抑郁药物治疗的成年患者,尤其是30岁以下的患者进行密切监测,对于安全和确保最佳治疗都很重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验