• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与你今天交谈对你来说是什么样的感受?:参与访谈研究对强奸幸存者的影响。

"What has it been like for you to talk with me today?": the impact of participating in interview research on rape survivors.

机构信息

Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1116, USA.

出版信息

Violence Against Women. 2010 Jan;16(1):60-83. doi: 10.1177/1077801209353576.

DOI:10.1177/1077801209353576
PMID:19949229
Abstract

The purpose of this project was to conduct a qualitative study of how participating in in-depth interviews impacted rape survivors. These interviews contained both open-ended, free response section and closed-ended, standardized assessments. The implementation of the interviews was informed by principles of feminist interviewing, which emphasized reducing hierarchy between the interviewer and interviewee, providing information and resources, and creating an emotionally supportive and compassionate setting. Narrative data were analyzed from rape survivors (N = 92) regarding how they were affected by participating in these interviews. Results suggested that the overwhelming majority of survivors found the interview to be a helpful, supportive, and insightful experience. Additional analyses revealed that the feminist interviewing principles were noticed and appreciated by the participants and contributed to their overall positive participation outcomes.

摘要

本项目旨在进行一项定性研究,以了解参与深入访谈对强奸幸存者的影响。这些访谈既有开放式、自由回答部分,也有封闭式、标准化评估。访谈的实施遵循了女权主义访谈原则,这些原则强调减少访谈者和受访者之间的层级关系,提供信息和资源,并营造一个情感上支持和富有同情心的环境。对 92 名强奸幸存者的叙事数据进行了分析,以了解他们参与这些访谈的影响。结果表明,绝大多数幸存者认为访谈是一次有帮助、支持和有启发性的经历。进一步的分析表明,女权主义访谈原则被参与者注意到并赞赏,这有助于他们的整体积极参与结果。

相似文献

1
"What has it been like for you to talk with me today?": the impact of participating in interview research on rape survivors.与你今天交谈对你来说是什么样的感受?:参与访谈研究对强奸幸存者的影响。
Violence Against Women. 2010 Jan;16(1):60-83. doi: 10.1177/1077801209353576.
2
Training interviewers for research on sexual violence: a qualitative study of rape survivors' recommendations for interview practice.为性暴力研究培训访谈员:一项关于强奸幸存者对访谈实践建议的定性研究
Violence Against Women. 2009 May;15(5):595-617. doi: 10.1177/1077801208331248. Epub 2009 Feb 10.
3
Why do rape survivors volunteer for face-to-face interviews? A meta-study of victims' reasons for and concerns about research participation.强奸幸存者为何自愿接受面对面访谈?一项关于受害者参与研究的原因及担忧的元研究。
J Interpers Violence. 2009 Mar;24(3):395-405. doi: 10.1177/0886260508317192. Epub 2008 Apr 16.
4
Doing community research without a community: creating safe space for rape survivors.在没有社区参与的情况下开展社区研究:为强奸幸存者创造安全空间。
Am J Community Psychol. 2004 Jun;33(3-4):253-61. doi: 10.1023/b:ajcp.0000027010.74708.38.
5
You have to make something of all that rubbish, do you? An empirical investigation of the social process of qualitative research.你得从那些废话中提炼出点东西来,不是吗?定性研究社会过程的实证调查。
Qual Health Res. 2008 Sep;18(9):1264-76. doi: 10.1177/1049732308321753.
6
Sexual assault survivors' reactions to a thought suppression paradigm.性侵犯幸存者对思维抑制范式的反应。
Violence Vict. 2006 Aug;21(4):473-81.
7
Participation in trauma research: is there evidence of harm?参与创伤研究:是否存在危害证据?
J Trauma Stress. 2003 Jun;16(3):221-7. doi: 10.1023/A:1023735821900.
8
Participants' experiences of being interviewed about an emotive topic.参与者就一个情感性话题接受访谈的经历。
J Adv Nurs. 2006 Sep;55(5):587-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03950.x.
9
Creating lasting attitude and behavior change in fraternity members and male student athletes: the qualitative impact of an empathy-based rape prevention program.在兄弟会成员和男学生运动员中创造持久的态度和行为改变:一项基于同理心的预防强奸计划的定性影响。
Violence Against Women. 2007 Jan;13(1):70-86. doi: 10.1177/1077801206295125.
10
Cooperation or co-optation?: Assessing the methodological benefits and barriers involved in conducting qualitative research through medical institutional settings.合作还是拉拢?评估通过医疗机构开展定性研究的方法学益处与障碍
Qual Health Res. 2005 May;15(5):686-97. doi: 10.1177/1049732304271832.

引用本文的文献

1
Painful, but necessary: a qualitative process evaluation on patient experiences with modified prolonged exposure as early intervention after rape (the EIR study).痛苦但必要:一项关于强奸后早期干预中患者对改良延长暴露疗法体验的定性过程评估(EIR研究)
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2524892. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2524892. Epub 2025 Jul 17.
2
Therapists perspectives on the Early Intervention after Rape study: a qualitative process evaluation of a randomized controlled trial.治疗师对强奸后早期干预研究的看法:一项随机对照试验的定性过程评估
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2443279. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2443279. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
3
Developing Guidelines for Conducting Stigma Research With Transgender and Nonbinary Individuals: Protocol for Creation of a Trauma-Informed Approach to Research.
制定针对跨性别者和非二元性别者进行污名研究的指南:创建创伤知情研究方法的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jan 6;14:e66800. doi: 10.2196/66800.
4
Research with women sexual assault survivors presenting for emergency care is safe: Results from a multi-site, prospective observational cohort study.对因遭受性侵犯而到急诊就诊的女性幸存者进行研究是安全的:一项多地点前瞻性观察队列研究的结果。
J Psychiatr Res. 2024 Oct;178:156-163. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.07.030. Epub 2024 Jul 27.
5
The Needs of Women Survivors of Rape: A Narrative Review.强奸女性幸存者的需求:一项叙述性综述
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2023 Nov 9;28(6):633-641. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_395_22. eCollection 2023 Nov-Dec.
6
Ethical inclusion: Risks and benefits of research from the perspective of perinatal people with opioid use disorders who have experienced incarceration.伦理纳入:从经历监禁的阿片类药物使用障碍围产期人群的角度看研究的风险和获益。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 22;18(11):e0294604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294604. eCollection 2023.
7
The Unexpected Benefits of a Decolonized Knowledge Translation Initiative for Indigenous Mother Participants.去殖民化知识转化倡议对原住民母亲参与者的意外益处。
Qual Health Res. 2023 Jun;33(7):638-646. doi: 10.1177/10497323231167308. Epub 2023 Apr 14.
8
Engagement of Sexual Violence Survivors in Research: Trauma-Informed Research in the THRIVE Study.性暴力幸存者参与研究:THRIVE 研究中的创伤知情研究。
Violence Against Women. 2023 Sep;29(11):2239-2265. doi: 10.1177/10778012221125501. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
9
Can a Scientist Be a Young, Attractive Woman? The Stereotype of a Scientist and the Lexical Choices of Women and Men.科学家能是年轻、有魅力的女性吗?科学家的刻板印象和男女的词汇选择。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2022 Jun;51(3):577-595. doi: 10.1007/s10936-022-09870-y. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
10
A scoping review of recommendations in the English language on conducting research with trauma-exposed populations since publication of the Belmont report; thematic review of existing recommendations on research with trauma-exposed populations.创伤暴露人群研究的英语推荐意见范围综述:自《贝尔蒙报告》发表以来;创伤暴露人群研究现有建议的主题综述。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 29;16(7):e0254003. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254003. eCollection 2021.