Suppr超能文献

对因遭受性侵犯而到急诊就诊的女性幸存者进行研究是安全的:一项多地点前瞻性观察队列研究的结果。

Research with women sexual assault survivors presenting for emergency care is safe: Results from a multi-site, prospective observational cohort study.

机构信息

Institute for Trauma Recovery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, USA.

Institute for Trauma Recovery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

J Psychiatr Res. 2024 Oct;178:156-163. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.07.030. Epub 2024 Jul 27.

Abstract

A barrier to research with sexual assault survivors is the concern that research participation might be a negative experience for participants. We report the experiences with research of adult women sexual assault survivors participating in a large-scale, multi-site, prospective observational study that enrolled participants at the time of presentation for emergency care. Participants (n = 706, M = 28 years of age; 57% white, 15% Black) self-reported their experience with research 1 week, 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year post-assault. The vast majority rated the research experience as positive (95-97%), reported no drawbacks (84-89%), and felt that participating was worth it (93-95%). Positive experiences with research remained stable across the year, were generally consistent across demographic and clinical groups, and were reflected in qualitative comments. Given the tremendous morbidity experienced by sexual assault survivors and lack of progress in developing improved treatments for this population, ethically-conducted research with sexual assault survivors receiving emergency care should be encouraged.

摘要

研究性侵幸存者的一个障碍是担心研究参与可能对参与者造成负面影响。我们报告了参与一项大规模、多地点、前瞻性观察研究的成年女性性侵幸存者的研究经历,该研究在急诊就诊时招募参与者。参与者(n=706,M=28 岁;57%为白人,15%为黑人)在性侵后 1 周、6 周、6 个月和 1 年时自我报告了他们的研究经历。绝大多数人(95-97%)对研究经历评价积极,报告没有缺点(84-89%),并认为参与是值得的(93-95%)。研究经历的积极程度在整个一年中保持稳定,在人口统计学和临床群体中基本一致,并反映在定性评论中。鉴于性侵幸存者经历了巨大的发病率,并且在为这一人群开发改进治疗方法方面没有取得进展,因此应该鼓励对接受急诊护理的性侵幸存者进行符合伦理的研究。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

6
Risk for Mental Disorders Associated With Sexual Assault: A Meta-Analysis.性侵犯相关精神障碍风险:一项荟萃分析。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2020 Dec;21(5):1011-1028. doi: 10.1177/1524838018813198. Epub 2018 Dec 25.
8
Trauma and PTSD in the WHO World Mental Health Surveys.世界卫生组织世界心理健康调查中的创伤与创伤后应激障碍
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2017 Oct 27;8(sup5):1353383. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2017.1353383. eCollection 2017.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验