Low R B, Dunne M J, Blumen I J, Tagney G
Department of Emergency Medicine, East Carolina University, Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Greenville, NC 27858.
Am J Emerg Med. 1991 Mar;9(2):103-6. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(91)90167-i.
The accident rate for emergency medical service (EMS) helicopters is thought to be approximately twice the rate for other commercial (Part 135) helicopters. This observation has led to numerous news reports and to the publication of conclusions of a National Transportation Safety Board investigation. The data for these reports come from investigations of EMS helicopter accidents and incidents. The authors surveyed all listed civilian EMS helicopter programs to examine both helicopter ambulance mishaps and the number of safely completed missions. Epidemiological methods were then used to compare the safety records of different groups of EMS helicopters. The single most important factor identified was the number of flights made by the program during the study period: busy programs had an eightfold lower accident rate (P less than .0005) and a three-fold lower total mishap (accidents + incidents) rate (P less than .0005) than less active programs. Programs with the ability to fly under instrument flight rules (IFR) at the pilots discretion had no mishaps (P = .044) during the study period. Multivariate analysis shows this IFR capability to be marginally significant as an independent factor (P = .099).
据认为,紧急医疗服务(EMS)直升机的事故率约为其他商业(第135部)直升机事故率的两倍。这一观察结果引发了众多新闻报道以及美国国家运输安全委员会一项调查结论的公布。这些报告的数据来自对EMS直升机事故和事件的调查。作者对所有列出的民用EMS直升机项目进行了调查,以检查直升机救护车事故以及安全完成任务的数量。然后采用流行病学方法比较不同组别的EMS直升机的安全记录。确定的唯一最重要因素是该项目在研究期间的飞行次数:繁忙的项目事故率比不太活跃的项目低八倍(P小于0.0005),总事故(事故+事件)率低三倍(P小于0.0005)。在研究期间,能够由飞行员自行决定按照仪表飞行规则(IFR)飞行的项目没有发生事故(P = 0.044)。多变量分析表明,作为一个独立因素,这种IFR能力略显显著(P = 0.099)。