• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单词识别过程调节人类视野的鼻颞侧不对称性。

Word recognition processes modulate the naso-temporal asymmetry of the human visual field.

作者信息

Lavidor Michal, Alexander Tim, McGraw Paul V

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK.

出版信息

Perception. 2009;38(10):1536-41. doi: 10.1068/p6078.

DOI:10.1068/p6078
PMID:19950484
Abstract

Many visual tasks display a well-documented naso-temporal asymmetry (NTA), where sensitivity is greater to stimuli presented in the temporal hemifield. Four-letter strings were presented at various eccentricities under monocular vision conditions, and observers were asked to classify the stimuli as 'words' or 'non-words' in a lexical decision task (experiment 1). In experiment 2, the same observers had to classify the stimuli as 'darker' or 'lighter' (contrast discrimination). Apart from the task, the visual conditions and stimuli were identical in both experiments. The typical temporal hemifield advantage was found for a contrast discrimination task in both English and Hebrew readers, but only for lexical decision judgments in Hebrew readers. The lack of the expected NTA in English readers that was observed only for a reading but not a low-level visual task indicates that language lateralisation and reading-related learning can override fundamental, anatomically based, visual asymmetries.

摘要

许多视觉任务都呈现出一种有充分文献记载的鼻颞侧不对称(NTA),即对颞侧半视野中呈现的刺激的敏感性更高。在单眼视觉条件下,在不同偏心度处呈现四个字母的字符串,并要求观察者在词汇判断任务中(实验1)将刺激分类为“单词”或“非单词”。在实验2中,相同的观察者必须将刺激分类为“较暗”或“较亮”(对比度辨别)。除了任务不同外,两个实验中的视觉条件和刺激都是相同的。在英语和希伯来语读者中,对比度辨别任务均发现了典型的颞侧半视野优势,但仅在希伯来语读者的词汇判断中发现了这种优势。仅在阅读任务而非低水平视觉任务中观察到的英语读者中缺乏预期的鼻颞侧不对称现象,表明语言侧化和与阅读相关的学习可以超越基于解剖结构的基本视觉不对称。

相似文献

1
Word recognition processes modulate the naso-temporal asymmetry of the human visual field.单词识别过程调节人类视野的鼻颞侧不对称性。
Perception. 2009;38(10):1536-41. doi: 10.1068/p6078.
2
English and Hebrew letter report by English- and Hebrew-reading subjects: evidence for stimulus control, not hemispheric asymmetry.由能阅读英文和希伯来文的受试者撰写的英文和希伯来文字母报告:刺激控制的证据,而非半球不对称。
Brain Cogn. 1994 May;25(1):34-51. doi: 10.1006/brcg.1994.1021.
3
Word length effects in Hebrew.希伯来语中的词长效应。
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Jun;24(1):127-32. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.01.002.
4
Hemispheric differences for identification of words and nonwords in Urdu-English bilinguals.乌尔都语-英语双语者在识别单词和非单词方面的半球差异。
Neuropsychology. 2006 Mar;20(2):232-48. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.20.2.232.
5
Cross-language tests of hemispheric strategies in reading nonwords.阅读非单词时半球策略的跨语言测试
Neuropsychology. 1999 Oct;13(4):498-515. doi: 10.1037//0894-4105.13.4.498.
6
The processing of lexical stress during visual word recognition: typicality effects and orthographic correlates.视觉单词识别过程中词汇重音的处理:典型性效应与正字法相关性
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 May;59(5):920-48. doi: 10.1080/02724980443000782.
7
Task-dependent modulation of neglect dyslexia? Novel evidence from the viewing position effect.忽视性阅读障碍的任务依赖型调制?来自观看位置效应的新证据。
Brain Res. 2008 Jan 16;1189:166-78. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.10.069. Epub 2007 Nov 12.
8
Lateral eyes or lateralized? Hemiretinal and ocular dominance effects on visual field asymmetries for the lexical decision task.侧眼还是偏侧化?半视网膜和眼优势对词汇判断任务视野不对称性的影响。
Brain Cogn. 1988 Oct;8(2):227-39. doi: 10.1016/0278-2626(88)90051-6.
9
Orthography and the hemispheres: visual and linguistic aspects of letter processing.正字法与大脑半球:字母处理的视觉和语言方面
Neuropsychology. 2004 Jan;18(1):174-84. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.18.1.174.
10
Language status and hemispheric involvement in reading: evidence from trilingual Arabic speakers tested in Arabic, Hebrew, and English.语言状态与阅读中的大脑半球参与:来自以阿拉伯语、希伯来语和英语进行测试的三语阿拉伯人的证据。
Neuropsychology. 2009 Mar;23(2):240-54. doi: 10.1037/a0014193.