Suppr超能文献

卫生、教育和社会服务系统中的绩效衡量和改进框架:系统评价。

Performance measurement and improvement frameworks in health, education and social services systems: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, HSC 3A, 1200 Main St W, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8N 3Z5.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 2010 Feb;22(1):44-69. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzp057. Epub 2009 Nov 30.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review, supplemented by a targeted grey literature scan, for performance measurement and improvement frameworks within and across the health, education and social service systems. The intended outcome was the creation of a foundation of evidence to inform the development of cross-sectoral quality improvement frameworks.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ERIC, EMBASE, Social Services Abstracts, Social Work Abstracts and Education Index Full Text were searched up to April/May 2007. In addition, 26 governmental and 27 organizational websites were searched.

STUDY SELECTION

English language material with a publication date of 1986 or more recent that described a health, education or social services multidimensional framework for performance measurement and improvement. Data extraction The framework name; administrative sector; level of application; setting; population of interest; categories of quality described within the framework; country of application; and citations to other performance measurement and improvement frameworks were extracted from each article.

RESULTS

In total, 111 frameworks were identified. Most frameworks (n = 97) were developed in or for the health sector. A concept sorting exercise identified 16 quality concepts applicable across many settings, sectors and levels of application.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review of quality domains will be relevant and useful to those who are developing and using performance measurement and improvement frameworks for adult and child populations within or across the health, social service or education sectors.

摘要

目的

通过系统评价(辅以目标灰色文献扫描),研究卫生、教育和社会服务系统内部和系统之间的绩效衡量和改进框架。预期结果是为跨部门质量改进框架的制定提供证据基础。

资料来源

截至 2007 年 4 月/5 月,检索了 MEDLINE、CINAHL、PsycINFO、ERIC、EMBASE、Social Services Abstracts、Social Work Abstracts 和 Education Index Full Text。此外,还检索了 26 个政府网站和 27 个组织网站。

研究选择

选择英语语言材料,出版日期为 1986 年或更近,描述了卫生、教育或社会服务多维绩效衡量和改进框架。从每篇文章中提取框架名称;行政部门;应用级别;设置;感兴趣的人群;框架内描述的质量类别;应用国家;以及与其他绩效衡量和改进框架的引文。

结果

共确定了 111 个框架。大多数框架(n = 97)是在卫生部门内部或为卫生部门制定的。概念分类练习确定了 16 个适用于许多环境、部门和应用级别的质量概念。

结论

对于那些正在为卫生、社会服务或教育部门内部或跨部门的成人和儿童人群制定和使用绩效衡量和改进框架的人来说,本质量领域的系统评价将是相关和有用的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验