VAN Rees Johannes B, Borleffs C Jan Willem, Bax Jeroen J, Nagtegaal Els M, VAN DER Velde Enno T, VAN Erven Lieselot, Schalij Martin J
Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2010 Apr;33(4):431-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02622.x. Epub 2009 Dec 1.
The Medtronic Sprint Fidelis (SF) implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD; Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) lead has a higher than expected failure rate. Because of patient safety, Medtronic announced two advisories consisting of (1) adjustments in device settings (October 2007) and (2) installation of a lead integrity algorithm (May 2008). The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of Medtronic's announcements on patient safety.
To comply with the advisories, two clinical evaluations were conducted. The effect of the advisories was assessed by the lead failure rate and the occurrence of inappropriate shocks due to lead failure. Three periods were distinguished in the comparison of event rates: lead implantation to advisory 1 (period A), in-between both advisories (period B), and advisory 2 to follow-up (period C).
Since 2004, 372 patients received a Medtronic ICD and SF lead and were followed from first implant (December 2004) to April 2009. Cumulative incidence rate of lead failure was 3.6%[95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6-5.6] at 21 months and increased to 11.0% (95% CI 6.1-15.9) at 42 months. After implementation of both advisories, the occurrence of inappropriate shocks due to lead failure decreased from 1.5 (95% CI 0.59, 3.00) per 100 lead-years in period A to 0.8 (95% CI 0.02, 4.25) per 100 lead-years in period C.
The current study demonstrates that despite an increasing risk for SF lead failure, implementation of the advisories decreased the occurrence of inappropriate shocks due to lead failure. (PACE 2010; 431-436).
美敦力公司的 Sprint Fidelis(SF)植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD;美敦力公司,美国明尼阿波利斯,MN)导线的故障率高于预期。出于患者安全考虑,美敦力公司发布了两项公告,包括(1)调整设备设置(2007 年 10 月)和(2)安装导线完整性算法(2008 年 5 月)。本研究的目的是评估美敦力公司公告对患者安全的影响。
为遵守公告要求,进行了两项临床评估。通过导线故障率和因导线故障导致的不适当电击发生率来评估公告的效果。在事件发生率比较中区分了三个时期:导线植入至公告 1(时期 A)、两项公告之间(时期 B)以及公告 2 至随访(时期 C)。
自 2004 年以来,372 例患者接受了美敦力 ICD 和 SF 导线,并从首次植入(2004 年 12 月)随访至 2009 年 4 月。导线故障的累积发生率在 21 个月时为 3.6%[95%置信区间(CI)1.6 - 5.6],在 42 个月时增至 11.0%(95%CI 6.1 - 15.9)。两项公告实施后,因导线故障导致的不适当电击发生率从时期 A 的每 100 导线年 1.5 次(95%CI 0.59,3.00)降至时期 C 的每 100 导线年 0.8 次(95%CI 0.02,4.25)。
当前研究表明,尽管 SF 导线故障风险增加,但公告的实施降低了因导线故障导致的不适当电击发生率。(《心律》2010 年;431 - 436)