Todhunter S L, Clamp P J, Gillett S, Pothier D D
Royal United Hospital, Bath NHS Trust.
J Laryngol Otol. 2010 Mar;124(3):324-7. doi: 10.1017/S0022215109991770. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
The National Health Service Plan of 2000 proposed that patients should receive a copy of all correspondence regarding their care. There is concern that the readability of patients' letters may not be appropriate for many patients.
This study determined readability scores for sequential letters written to general practitioners and copied to patients, following ENT consultations at the Royal United Hospital in Bath. Intervention involved educating clinicians in techniques to improve readability.
A total of 295 letters from eight clinicians were assessed in the pre-intervention phase. The mean Flesch reading ease score was 61.8 (standard deviation 8.7) and the mean Flesch-Kincaid reading grade was 9.0 (standard deviation 1.7). Re-audit analysed a further 301 letters. There was no significant change in the readability of the letters post-intervention.
It may not be feasible to present medical information intended for general practitioners in a way that is readable to most of the UK adult population.
2000年的《国民医疗服务计划》提议,患者应收到所有与他们的治疗相关的信件副本。有人担心,患者信件的可读性可能对许多患者来说并不合适。
本研究确定了在巴斯皇家联合医院进行耳鼻喉科会诊后写给全科医生并抄送患者的连续信件的可读性分数。干预措施包括对临床医生进行提高可读性技巧的培训。
在干预前阶段,共评估了来自八位临床医生的295封信。弗莱什易读性平均分数为61.8(标准差8.7),弗莱什-金凯德阅读年级平均分数为9.0(标准差1.7)。重新审核分析了另外301封信。干预后信件的可读性没有显著变化。
以大多数英国成年人口可读的方式呈现给全科医生的医疗信息可能不可行。