Lidén Göran, Waher Jüri
Department of Applied Occupational Environmental Science, Stockholm University, S-10691 Stockholm, Sweden.
Ann Occup Hyg. 2010 Jan;54(1):100-16. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mep075. Epub 2009 Dec 2.
An inhaling mannequin, CALTOOL, was used in a specially ventilated room to compare the concentrations inhaled with those sampled by samplers mounted across the breathing zone. The CALTOOL is made from metal sheets and consists of a cylindrical torso (42 x 24 x 54 cm) with a circular cylinder as head. A circular nozzle simulates the mouth. This nozzle is part of a cassette that holds a filter. The inhalation rate is not periodic but kept constant at nominally 20 l min(-1). The CALTOOL was placed in a horizontal air stream ( approximately 10 cm s(-1)) either facing or back to the wind. In front of the lower chest of the CALTOOL, a particle source was mounted which emitted particles with a momentum directed upwards at an angle of 45 degrees towards the CALTOOL. Five monodisperse aluminium oxide powders were used as test aerosols. The mass median aerodynamic diameters of the test aerosols ranged approximately 10 to 95 mum. Six conically shaped aerosol samplers were mounted horizontally and over the breathing zone of the CALTOOL, one on each shoulder, three across the upper torso, and one at the lower torso centre. Four to six runs per test aerosol and CALTOOL orientation in the airflow were conducted. The samples were analysed gravimetrically. The concentration ratio aerosol sampler to the CALTOOL cassette was determined for the investigated mounting positions. The results showed that when the CALTOOL was exposed to particles emitted with momentum from a point source in front of the lower chest, the variation in concentration over the breathing zone was large. The ratio of the concentration sampled by an aerosol sampler mounted somewhere within the breathing zone to the CALTOOL cassette concentration, would, for specific particle sizes, easily differ by a factor of 3, but may extend up to 10-100, depending on the particular conditions. The basic concept of a breathing zone consisting of a hemisphere of radius 25-30 cm is therefore not well suited for workers handling a point source emitting large particles. For such sampling situations, it is suggested that the radius of the breathing zone is reduced to 10 cm, which may be achieved by a head-mounted sampler.
在一个专门通风的房间里,使用了一个吸入人体模型CALTOOL,以比较吸入的浓度与安装在呼吸区域的采样器所采集的浓度。CALTOOL由金属板制成,包括一个圆柱形躯干(42×24×54厘米),头部为圆柱体。一个圆形喷嘴模拟嘴巴。这个喷嘴是一个装有过滤器的盒子的一部分。吸入速率不是周期性的,而是保持在名义上20升/分钟(-1)的恒定值。CALTOOL被放置在水平气流(约10厘米/秒)中,要么迎风要么背风。在CALTOOL下胸部前方安装了一个粒子源,该粒子源发射的粒子动量向上,以45度角朝向CALTOOL。使用了五种单分散氧化铝粉末作为测试气溶胶。测试气溶胶的质量中值空气动力学直径约为10至95微米。六个锥形气溶胶采样器水平安装在CALTOOL的呼吸区域上方,一个在每个肩膀上,三个横跨上躯干,一个在下躯干中心。针对每个测试气溶胶和CALTOOL在气流中的方向进行四到六次运行。对样品进行重量分析。确定了在所研究的安装位置上气溶胶采样器与CALTOOL盒子的浓度比。结果表明,当CALTOOL暴露于下胸部前方点源发射的粒子时,呼吸区域内的浓度变化很大。对于特定粒径,安装在呼吸区域内某处的气溶胶采样器所采集的浓度与CALTOOL盒子浓度之比很容易相差3倍,但根据具体情况可能会扩大到10 - 100倍。因此,由半径为25 - 30厘米的半球组成的呼吸区域的基本概念不太适合处理发射大粒子的点源的工人。对于这种采样情况,建议将呼吸区域的半径减小到10厘米,这可以通过头戴式采样器实现。