Arnold Lesley M, Clauw Daniel J, Wohlreich Madelaine M, Wang Fujun, Ahl Jonna, Gaynor Paula J, Chappell Amy S
Women's Health Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Ohio, USA.
Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry. 2009;11(5):237-44. doi: 10.4088/PCC.08m00680.
To investigate the efficacy of duloxetine in the treatment of pain and improvement in functional impairment and quality of life in patients with fibromyalgia from a pooled analysis of 4 placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trials.
Patients were eligible for inclusion in the studies if they were at least 18 years of age, met criteria for fibromyalgia as defined by the American College of Rheumatology, and had specified minimum pain severity scores. Across all studies, 797 patients received duloxetine 60-120 mg/d and 535 patients received placebo. Pain was assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) 24-hour average pain severity score; other efficacy measures included the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale (CGI-S), Patient Global Impressions-Improvement scale (PGI-I), 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17), Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) total score, BPI pain interference items, Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), and Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) mental and physical components. Changes from baseline to endpoint (last observation carried forward) for most of the above efficacy measures were analyzed using an analysis-of-covariance model.
After 12 weeks of treatment, pain was significantly reduced in patients treated with duloxetine (P < .001) compared with placebo. In addition, duloxetine was superior to placebo in improving CGI-S (P < .001); PGI-I (P < .001); FIQ total (P < .001); HDRS-17 total (P = .003); SDS global functioning (P < .001), work/school (P = .018), and family life (P < .001); SF-36 mental (P < .001) and physical (P = .026) component; and BPI pain interference (P < .001) scores. Treatment-by-subgroup interactions were not significant for sex (P = .320), age (P = .362), or race (P = .180).
This pooled analysis provides evidence that 12 weeks of treatment with duloxetine 60-120 mg/d effectively improves fibromyalgia symptoms and may offer benefits beyond pain relief.
通过对4项安慰剂对照、双盲、随机试验的汇总分析,研究度洛西汀治疗纤维肌痛患者疼痛的疗效以及功能障碍和生活质量的改善情况。
年龄至少18岁、符合美国风湿病学会定义的纤维肌痛标准且有特定最低疼痛严重程度评分的患者符合纳入研究条件。在所有研究中,797例患者接受度洛西汀60 - 120 mg/d治疗,535例患者接受安慰剂治疗。通过简明疼痛问卷(BPI)24小时平均疼痛严重程度评分评估疼痛;其他疗效指标包括临床总体印象-疾病严重程度量表(CGI-S)、患者总体印象-改善量表(PGI-I)、17项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDRS-17)、纤维肌痛影响问卷(FIQ)总分、BPI疼痛干扰项目、希恩残疾量表(SDS)以及医学结局研究36项简短健康调查(SF-36)的心理和生理分量表。使用协方差分析模型分析上述大多数疗效指标从基线到终点(末次观察结转)的变化。
治疗12周后,与安慰剂相比,度洛西汀治疗的患者疼痛显著减轻(P <.001)。此外,度洛西汀在改善CGI-S(P <.001)、PGI-I(P <.001)、FIQ总分(P <.001)、HDRS-17总分(P =.003)、SDS总体功能(P <.001)、工作/学校(P =.018)和家庭生活(P <.001)、SF-36心理(P <.001)和生理(P =.026)分量表以及BPI疼痛干扰(P <.001)评分方面优于安慰剂。治疗×亚组交互作用在性别(P =.320)、年龄(P =.362)或种族(P =.180)方面无显著性差异。
这项汇总分析提供了证据,表明度洛西汀60 - 120 mg/d治疗12周可有效改善纤维肌痛症状,且可能带来疼痛缓解之外的益处。