• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[使用锥形束计算机断层扫描评估腭部种植体的植入部位]

[Evaluation of the implant sites of palatal implants using cone beam computed tomography].

作者信息

Zou Hui, Lai Ren-Fa, Kong Wei-Dong, Lin Wei, Chen Min-Ying

机构信息

Department of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510630, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2009 Jul;44(7):404-8.

PMID:19957572
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the vertical bone height and the bone density of the palate for implants placement using cone beam CT(CBCT) and to provide references to the safe and stable placement of palatal implants.

METHODS

Three-dimensional reformatting images were reconstructed with the selected CBCT scanning data of 34 patients aged 18 to 35 yeras, by means of EZ implant software. The vertical bone height was measured at 20 interesting sites of palate. Bone density was measured at 10 sites that could support 3.0 mm long implants. The data of the vertical bone height and bone density were analyzed by K-means cluster analysis.

RESULTS

According to the cluster analysis results, the 10 sites were classified into 3 clusters. There were statistical differences among these three clusters in bone height and bone density (P < 0.05). The LSD result showed that the greatest mean value of vertical bone height was obtained in cluster 2, followed by cluster 1 and cluster 3; the highest bone density was founded in cluster 3, followed by cluster 1 and cluster 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluation of the sites for palatal implant placement with cone beam CT would be helpful in safe and stable implantation.

摘要

目的

利用锥形束CT(CBCT)研究腭部种植体植入区域的垂直骨高度和骨密度,为腭部种植体的安全稳定植入提供参考。

方法

选取34例年龄在18至35岁患者的CBCT扫描数据,通过EZ种植软件重建三维重组图像。在腭部20个感兴趣部位测量垂直骨高度。在10个能够支持3.0 mm长种植体的部位测量骨密度。采用K均值聚类分析对垂直骨高度和骨密度数据进行分析。

结果

根据聚类分析结果,10个部位分为3组。这三组在骨高度和骨密度方面存在统计学差异(P < 0.05)。LSD结果显示,垂直骨高度平均值最大的是第2组,其次是第1组和第3组;骨密度最高的是第3组,其次是第1组和第2组。

结论

使用锥形束CT评估腭部种植体植入部位有助于实现安全稳定的种植。

相似文献

1
[Evaluation of the implant sites of palatal implants using cone beam computed tomography].[使用锥形束计算机断层扫描评估腭部种植体的植入部位]
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2009 Jul;44(7):404-8.
2
Applied anatomic site study of palatal anchorage implants using cone beam computed tomography.应用锥形束 CT 研究腭部种植体支抗的解剖学位置。
Int J Oral Sci. 2010 Jun;2(2):98-104. doi: 10.4248/IJOS10036.
3
Vertical palatal bone dimensions on lateral cephalometry and cone-beam computed tomography: implications for palatal implant placement.侧位头颅测量和锥形束 CT 中的垂直腭骨尺寸:对腭部植入物放置的影响。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 Jun;22(6):664-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02021.x. Epub 2010 Oct 6.
4
The evaluation of palatal bone thickness for implant insertion with cone beam computed tomography.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描评估种植体植入时的腭骨厚度。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Feb;45(2):216-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.09.012. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
5
Comparison of median and paramedian regions for planning palatal mini-implants: a study in vivo using cone beam computed tomography.用于腭部微型种植体植入规划的正中区域与旁正中区域的比较:一项使用锥形束计算机断层扫描的体内研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Oct;43(10):1265-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2014.04.010. Epub 2014 May 18.
6
Anatomical assessment by cone beam computed tomography with the use of lateral cephalograms to analyse the vertical bone height of the anterior palate for orthodontic mini-implants.应用锥形束计算机断层扫描进行解剖评估,结合侧位头颅侧位片分析正畸微种植体上前腭骨的垂直骨高度。
Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021 Feb;24(1):78-86. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12406. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
7
Vertical bone volume in the paramedian palate of adolescents: a computed tomography study.青少年腭中缝垂直骨量:一项计算机断层扫描研究
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Dec;132(6):783-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.11.042.
8
Preoperative diagnostic for palatal implants: Is CT or CBCT necessary?腭部种植术前的诊断:CT 还是 CBCT 有必要?
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Jun;14(3):400-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00259.x. Epub 2010 Feb 3.
9
Evaluation of the palatal bone in different facial patterns for orthodontic mini-implants insertion: A cone-beam computed tomography study.不同面型患者腭骨评估用于正畸微种植体植入:锥形束 CT 研究。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2021 Mar 22;26(1):e2119204. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.26.1.e2119204.oar. eCollection 2021.
10
Evaluation of palatal support tissues for placement of orthodontic mini-implants in mouth breathers with high-narrow palates versus nose breathers with normal palates: a retrospective study.高拱腭口呼吸者与正常腭鼻呼吸者正畸微种植体植入的腭支持组织评估:一项回顾性研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Mar;24(3):1259-1267. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-03004-w. Epub 2019 Jul 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of object location on the density measurement in cone-beam computed tomography versus multislice computed tomography.锥形束计算机断层扫描与多层螺旋计算机断层扫描中物体位置对密度测量的影响。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2012 Dec;9(Suppl 1):S81-7.